If you need urgent support, call 999 or go to your nearest A&E. To contact our Crisis Messenger (open 24/7) text THEMIX to 85258.
Options
Take a look around and enjoy reading the discussions. If you'd like to join in, it's really easy to register and then you'll be able to post. If you'd like to learn what this place is all about, head here.
Comments
Phoney Blair I love it. That's even better then "Princess Tony"!!!
Lovely story - but completely untrue.
Page 25 - Interesting article headlined "The Death of New Labour".
How Phoney Blairs aspirations about transforming left-wing politics, the welfare state and modernising public services have been trounced by Gordon Brown's obstruction who is still Old labour at heart.
Brown has insisted on the State retaining a monoply on the provision of healthcare through the NHS, blocking even the most minimal attempts to free hospitals from Whitehall control.
Page 27 - Great articel by Peter Hitchens entitled "Its not apathy that will stop me voting, its anger, disgust ..... and revulsion"
Page 37 - "My Terrifying 24 hours as a Gypsy Gangster" by journalist Ross Slater.
A truly horrific tale of crime and violence by gangs of gypsies.
Page 49 - Labour gives junkies free heroin on NHS
Well what can you say about a story like that except - not surprised!!!!!
Pages 51 -54 Phoney Blair is charged with liying and over 4 pages of lies, corruption and spin. In fact so much I had to reach for a sick bag!
Great Sunday paper, back to the Daily Mail tomorrow, can't wait!!!
I thought that the policy was to prescribe methadone to junkies. I'm not sure that it would be a bad idea to return to the old policy of prescribing heroin to registered heroin addicts. I don't feel I know enough about the issue to judge what's the best policy - i.e., what's the most effective harm-reduction policy.
I am just intrigued to come across the claim that the policy has changed. I haven't come across this story elsewhere. My guess is that the Mail on Sunday has got it wrong. Is there anyone here well enough informed on the issue to clarify whether the policy really has changed or not?
Mind you, that still leaves the question of whether the Mail story is true or not. Does the Govt intend to change the rules?
Now I'm sure you're a troll.
Some interesting stories today:
Page 4 - Blair retreats on postal vote with new laws to curb Labour fraud
Pages 6-7 - Howard "I'll end Migrant Terror Risk"
Page 18 - Immigration & the Demonising of Decency - good article by Melanie Phillips
Page 25 - Four Die after MRSA hits Great Ormond Street Hospital
Page 29 - PC Brigade banishes the Holy Ghost from lessons
Page 36 - The Brussels Bonus - Scams can let an MEP fiddle £5,000 a month
Marvellous stuff!
I think that says more about the people than anything else.
Absolute class! ->Daily Mail headline generator
Ask yourself the question....Why do so many people of different creeds and colour buy the Daily Mail?
Did you want to explain to us why this is a bad idea, or do you actually know nothing about the issue?
It read something like: POLICE INVESTIGATES LABOUR MINISTER'S VICIOUS ATTACK ON WOMAN.
It was only 12 paragraphs later, in minuscule font and buried on the inside pages that you learned the "vicious attack" in question consisted in the Labour minister placing a note of complaint on the woman's car windscreen regarding some dispute.
That is the kind of journalism the HateMail excels at.
Problem is though, sensationalist bullshit sells.
Scientists had possibly linked cot death with a virus/bacteria and the reporters had asked how this might be spread, when asked if it could be given from the mother to the infant he said 'erm yes, its a possibility but highly unlikely'
The headline? 'Cot Death in Mothers Kiss'
It seems to me that there is an element of intellectual snobbery by those who attack us Daily Mail readers, it usually comes from the tree-hugging, social-worker, Green activist Grauniad types, who've never been weaned from their infantile left-wing socialist leanings!
There's no "seems" about it. Anyone with any level of intellect snubs the Daily "Hate" Mail.
Can I just point out that 58 million people don't read the Daily Mosley?
So its readership can hardly be described as "the British people" can it?
No such thing, RK.
I can't even read most newspapers and the mail has to be worse than the sun or star. At least they don't pretend to be anything more than comics for adults. And most importantly they have tits in. Naked women for teh win!
Let's face it if you wrote all the facts that are in daily newspapers on a sheet of A4 there would be plenty of room for a very spaious shopping list as well.