Home Politics & Debate
If you need urgent support, call 999 or go to your nearest A&E. To contact our Crisis Messenger (open 24/7) text THEMIX to 85258.
Read the community guidelines before posting ✨
Options

Goodbye to Foxhunting

123457»

Comments

  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Feel free to go and live in a mud hut and get back to nature.

    Another meaningless statement. We are part of nature you fool. This natural/human division is false and meaningless. We are part of nature, there is no "nature" to get back to.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Carolina wrote:
    What's honestly amazed me is some people's ignorance to the plain facts.

    One-Shooting foxes is not always the "humane" option. You can't always get a clean kill on a fox (or any animal for that matter) and i'd rather it took 2 seconds for the fox to die (by a lead hound on a hunt) than 20 minutes through an ill aimed shot.
    Second-the hunt do not block a fox in when it has gone to ground. They move off and draw another cover.
    Third-the pack of dogs does not kill the fox, the lead hound kills, usually within only a couple of seconds.
    Fourth-oh humane lovers, what happens to the packs of these dogs who have nothing wrong but been born into a job when they get made redundant? Hounds cannot be rehomed to normal pet lives as they are working animals, so the answer? Kill the entire pack? Sounds great doesn't it.
    Fifth-the effect this will have on the countryside economy now that the farriers, huntstaff etc. are not used because of the disbanding of hunts?


    I have no wish to see either side use violent methods against each other- i believe people should have the right to their own opinions or demonstrations but i don't believe huntsmen should be beating up anti's but then again i've seen anti's dragging people off horseback, scaring horses in order to dislodge/scare riders. Blagsta - you might have insider information on many things but anti's are just as likely to use violence as the pro - hunt supporters.

    Some people need to learn some facts and figures instead of just reading other people's propaganda and spouting off from it. Other people have some very just arguements though which is why it's called a debate. What i take offence at is it being branded a toffy nosed sport full of blood thirsty bastards -by people who don't understand half of what they're on about. I've met plumbers, brickies, secretaries, stone masons and various other everyday normal working class people on hunts.Anyway i thought the ban was about the killing of foxes and wasn't a class issue so why do people make such a big deal out of the upper class bit if it's not about that?


    A post that is so full of lies, half truths and misinformation that I don't really know where to start. Suffice to say that most experienced sabs actually know a hell of a lot about fox hunting and its history. The violence that sabs might dish out is only in response to the violence from the hunts. The history of fox hunting has nothing to do with population control and everything to do with the the aristicracy and Royalty. Studies show that fox hunting has very little effect on population control. If it was about population control, why do "plumbers, brickies, secretaries, stone masons and various other everyday normal working class people" go hunting? All I want is a bit of honesty - you go hunting for the thrill of the chase and as an excuse to socialise and gallop around the countryside. I know it and you know it, so just admit it will you?
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    with all respect MOK ...you are showing your true colours of ignorance here with a statement like that.
    that is just a whole heap of other shit along with total lack of public transport in some areas ...whilst your telling us we can't drive fours ...
    the countryside has been in crisis for years. not economicaly ...not socialy ...but politicaly.
    the people of the countryside were once the majority ...now we are the minority.
    the city dictates our lives as it does yours ...but this minority aren't allowed to stand up for anything that doesn't mean something ...to the playstation people.
    such fucking hypocrites!

    The Countryside Alliance do not defend working class interests. They stand for big business and landowners. They don't give a fuck about post offices or ordinary people.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Blagsta wrote:
    A post that is so full of lies, half truths and misinformation that I don't really know where to start. Suffice to say that most experienced sabs actually know a hell of a lot about fox hunting and its history. The violence that sabs might dish out is only in response to the violence from the hunts. The history of fox hunting has nothing to do with population control and everything to do with the the aristicracy and Royalty. Studies show that fox hunting has very little effect on population control. If it was about population control, why do "plumbers, brickies, secretaries, stone masons and various other everyday normal working class people" go hunting? All I want is a bit of honesty - you go hunting for the thrill of the chase and as an excuse to socialise and gallop around the countryside. I know it and you know it, so just admit it will you?

    Don't shift the blame of sab violence onto the hunt community. Both sides will always have those that wish for violence. Your comment about "sabs dish out violence because the hunts use it first" is bollocks. There are some sabs who would use violence as a means to an end instead of the normal peaceful demonstrations. The same as there are some hunt people who are the same. So don't try and pass the buck eh, just be a good boy and admit it.
    I wasn't aware that the majority of my post was about population control. I was merely trying to say that the people who seem to be shouting the loudest are the people who have never ventured into a rural community, spoken to the real people involved e.g farriers, huntstaff, farmers etc. and got their side of things. I see both sides as i've grown up with the hunt, but also have friends who don't agree with it.
    Unlike you i respect that people have freedom of speech and if people don't agree then i respect their wishes and don't ram it down their throats.
    Who on earth do you think you are to tell me i'm a liar just because my facts aren't the same as the ones in the "sab manual".
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Stop your lies. I gave up sabbing in the mid 90's when it started getting really violent. Sabs were sick of the beatings, intimidation and violence from hunts, the sexual assaults on female sabs etc. Some decided to go out tooled up and masked up and give it back. If that's continued, you only have yourselves to blame.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Blagsta wrote:
    Stop your lies. I gave up sabbing in the mid 90's when it started getting really violent. Sabs were sick of the beatings, intimidation and violence from hunts, the sexual assaults on female sabs etc. Some decided to go out tooled up and masked up and give it back. If that's continued, you only have yourselves to blame.

    I don't condone it on either side. If this has happened in the past then i'll not condone the people that did it on either side so stop trying to make out that in some way i was to blame for the sickening violence used by both sides. I'm not a football hooligan, i don't believe in human on human violence for whatever cause.

    You tell me to stop my lies, who are you to tell me this. I'm allowed my opinion as are you. Just because i don't believe some of your facts and actually debate them from a position of someone involved you tell me i'm a liar? Go back to your inner sanctum of hate blagsta and just realise that freedom of speech was won a long time ago and that your facts are not always right.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Kermit wrote:
    You obviously don't pay enough attention to just what disgusting creatures foxes really are then.

    Foxes will quite happily torture and kill and entire coop of chickens, and not eat a single one.

    "Regrettably, the vast majority of poultry these days are kept in battery cages or broiler sheds and are therefore not at risk from fox attacks. Free-range poultry are rarely taken by foxes in daylight and therefore losses will be small, provided that the birds are securely housed at dusk. In most cases where foxes kill a large number of birds, it is because the farmer has failed to shut the hen house door or the housing is inadequate - in other words poor husbandry. Foxes are accused of 'killing for fun' because they may flee leaving many dead birds behind. This is known to biologists as 'surplus killing'. In the unnatural surroundings of a chicken-run the fox's natural killing instinct is continually triggered by prey which are prevented from scattering as they would in the wild. In fact, it has been shown that when a fox gets into a chicken coop the commotion arouses the farmer and his dogs, lights go on, doors open and the fox flees.


    However it is known that in an undisturbed situation, the fox will make many trips to carry off the dead birds, and bury them for future use when food may be scarce. Such caching of food is instinctive for foxes and has even been observed in young orphaned cubs."


    http://www.league.uk.com/cruel_sports/british_wildlife/fox/is_the_fox_a_pest.htm


    In short, more lies and myths about foxes spread by farmers and the pro-hunting lot.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Carolina wrote:
    I don't condone it on either side. If this has happened in the past then i'll not condone the people that did it on either side so stop trying to make out that in some way i was to blame for the sickening violence used by both sides. I'm not a football hooligan, i don't believe in human on human violence for whatever cause.

    You tell me to stop my lies, who are you to tell me this. I'm allowed my opinion as are you. Just because i don't believe some of your facts and actually debate them from a position of someone involved you tell me i'm a liar? Go back to your inner sanctum of hate blagsta and just realise that freedom of speech was won a long time ago and that your facts are not always right.

    *yawn*

    I don't really give much of a fuck about fox hunting these days, I just wish you lot could be honest occasionally.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    .
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Perhaps... but it's consistent with what many others have observed.

    The Countryside Alliance and the farmers who make such claims on the other hand can present little or no evidence whatsoever to support them. In fact the immense majority of them can be easily dismissed as inaccurate or plain lies.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    .
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    People could organise around their own interests perhaps?
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    .
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    I know its not easy, but if you want something done properly, you often need to do it yourself...
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Listen guys, the legislation is there, but fox hunting will continue for many years to come, the police will turn a blind eye, this is part of their culture they will continue.
    If the law banned halal meat for the unecessary suffering created by the methods of killing the animal, do you think muslims would stop eating halal meat?
    No, of corse not because this is part of their culture.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Isenheart8 wrote:
    Listen guys, the legislation is there, but fox hunting will continue for many years to come, the police will turn a blind eye, this is part of their culture they will continue.
    If the law banned halal meat for the unecessary suffering created by the methods of killing the animal, do you think muslims would stop eating halal meat?
    No, of corse not because this is part of their culture.

    Erm, isn't eating halal meat a religious proscription - like say kosher food for jewish people?

    Which part of the bible says though shall run after little foxes with expensive horses and dogs, till the leetle fox is ripped to shreds?

    And, werm is it OT or NT?

    We should be told.....
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Blagsta wrote:
    The Countryside Alliance do not defend working class interests. They stand for big business and landowners. They don't give a fuck about post offices or ordinary people.
    i can only speak for north wales ...where the majority of farms are still small and family owned ...and seriously hard graft!
    they own some land and machinery ...but they are mostly very working class ...who'd a thunk that the workers may one day have owned the means of production aye?
    and be fighting tooth and nail to keep the small shop open ...even the pub ...and have to fight to get some kind of public transport for the elderly and the children ...
    lincolnshire for example ...is another farming world far removed from north wales ...lincolnshire is mainly agro bizz and helicopters flying the boss from farm to farm.
    sorry to disapoint you but ...n. wales is more akin to the waltons.
    and the fucking waltons are fighting to keep their jobs and their lifestyles.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Maybe we could adapt the fox as a domestic pet? Scientists in russia have been doing experiments and it seems they can be domesticated, and they are more intelligent than dogs! I think it wud be great to have a fox as a pet !
  • Options
    SkiveSkive Posts: 15,286 Skive's The Limit
    Isenheart8 wrote:
    Maybe we could adapt the fox as a domestic pet? Scientists in russia have been doing experiments and it seems they can be domesticated, and they are more intelligent than dogs! I think it wud be great to have a fox as a pet !


    They stink like a ferret!
    Weekender Offender 
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    As far as i can see the fox hunting ban isn't about animal cruelty. If it were then other "sports" such as pheasant/grouse/pigeon shooting, greyhound racing, fishing where the fish are constantly thrown back etc. etc. would also be banned.

    It's a political tool is all.
Sign In or Register to comment.