Home Politics & Debate
If you need urgent support, call 999 or go to your nearest A&E. To contact our Crisis Messenger (open 24/7) text THEMIX to 85258.
Read the community guidelines before posting ✨
Options

immigration

15791011

Comments

  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    I havent said any of those things....... yet. "Do you really think that a system that allows a very few to have lots at the expense of everyone else a good or "advanced" system?" Please Blagsta, Stalin died 50 years ago, you don't have to appease him with your hatred of the "borgeois" anymore.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    I'm starting to feel like a stuck record - debate the points made rather than personally directing comments or its toasting time
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Originally posted by giantno1
    I havent said any of those things....... yet. "Do you really think that a system that allows a very few to have lots at the expense of everyone else a good or "advanced" system?" Please Blagsta, Stalin died 50 years ago, you don't have to appease him with your hatred of the "borgeois" anymore.

    :confused:

    What the fuck has Stalin got to do with anything? :confused::confused::confused:

    I was telling you why your previous question is debatable. 10/10 for avoiding answering with a total non-sequitur. Fact is, much like you can't tell me what constitutes "British culture", you also can't answer these questions either.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Stalin has alot to do with everything. He portrayed himself as the natural successor to Lenin after Lenin's death in January 1924. Lenin strongly believed in the views of Karl Marx, an earlier German philosopher. These views formed his ideology which was that the state should be run for the proleteriat by the proleteriat and that the upper-class 'borgeois' were exploiting the proleteriat. Stalin also publicised these views as being his own. THEREFORE, your comment "Do you really think that a system that allows a very few to have lots at the expense of everyone else a good or "advanced" system?" has a fucking lot to do with Stalin because it's a reflection of communist ideology.

    Anyway, to keep it simple, British culture is pubs, sunday roasts and keeping a stiff upper lip. And no I dont think that "A system that allows a very few to have lots at the expense of everyone else is a good or "advanced" system?" I never said that I did. How is this statement relevant anyhow?
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Fuck me, you're not very bright are you? Shall I recap?

    You asked "why is Europe the most technologically and culturally advanced continent in the world?" I replied that it was debatable that it was. You replied that this was a "typical liberal response".
    I replied by stating why it is a debatable point. You have consistently avoided answering. Shall I repeat myself?
    Can we measure cultural value? If we can, by what criteria do we measure it? Are these values absolute or relative? And by European culture, I'm assuming that you mean liberal capitalism. It is a fact that under capitalism, very few own most of the wealth at the expense of the majority. This is a fact not a "reflection of communist ideology."

    Meeting the basic needs of the populations of developing countries (food, drinking water, sanitation, health care and education) would cost roughly $40 billion a year, or 4% of the combined wealth of the 225 richest people in the world.

    From http://www.unesco.org/courier/1999_03/uk/dossier/txt12.htm

    Do you think that is "culturally advanced"?

    Still can't see what Stalin has to do with it. The words "grasping" and "straws" come to mind. :rolleyes:
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Originally posted by giantno1
    Anyway, to keep it simple, British culture is pubs, sunday roasts and keeping a stiff upper lip.

    Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha!
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    aladin, i think you've built sich a left wing reputation about yourself that everything you say has to be left wing anything to the right is wrong, what do you mean asylum is not a problem, it's not that we hate seeing blacks walkin down the street, we are annoyed at the fact that an illegal immigrants take up outr tax money, get away with crime etc wen the problem wud be about 25% less without them, there's so many bad implications connected with them, your utopian ideas are clearly outnumbered, just wise up
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Originally posted by turlough
    we are annoyed at the fact that an illegal immigrants take up outr tax money, get away with crime etc wen the problem wud be about 25% less without them, there's so many bad implications connected with them, your utopian ideas are clearly outnumbered, just wise up

    Evidence? You can't provide any.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Originally posted by Blagsta
    Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha!

    Why do you laugh at your heritige Blagsta? You clearly coudn't give a shit that your British and are prepared to let this country be overrun with foreign people. Some people have nationalistic values and pride in their country, if you could'nt give a shit about the future then it's your own downfall which you advocate.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    thats the problem with liberals turlough, they need everything written down on paper for them. They cant see the proof around them for themselves. Probably due to their pathetic sense of never dying optimism.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Originally posted by Blagsta
    Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha!

    Come on Blagsta, either debate or dont post.
    Why do you always do stuff like this ? I aint read all the thread and I dont know who's said what but really is there any need for that reply ?
    This is the politics forum for debate, bout time you realised that.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Originally posted by giantno1
    Why do you laugh at your heritige Blagsta? You clearly coudn't give a shit that your British and are prepared to let this country be overrun with foreign people. Some people have nationalistic values and pride in their country, if you could'nt give a shit about the future then it's your own downfall which you advocate.

    I laughed because your response was so typical, simplistic and risible that it hardly deserves a response. But I will reply if you like (although you are so stuck in your bigoted narrow minded views that I doubt it will make fuck all difference).

    Yes, these things you posted are aspects of "British culture". But to think that "British culture" is a homogenised and static thing, betrays a huge lack of knowledge, observation and analysis. "British culture" is a mutable ever changing thing that means lots of different things to different people. For some people it is pubs, roast dinners and the stiff upper lip (this last is not a good thing imo, leads to repressed emotion and all sorts of neuroses), although where this leaves my black and asian mates (some of whom are Muslim) in your world view, when they come down the pub with me or eat a roast, I don't know. Hardly "erasing our culture" are they?
    But British culture is so much more than this. Britain has a long tradition of dissidence and political protest. Read up on the Diggers, the Levellers, the peasants revolt, Wat Tyler and the enclosures acts sometime. Did you know that squatters rights go back to the English civil war? Did you know that Balti meals are uniquely British? As is vindaloo and biryani? That house music that you hold so dear is a product of immigration, a mixing up of cultures. Drum'n'bass and jungle is also uniquely British.
    A night on the piss is often rounded off with a kebab. Another product of immigrant culture.
    The fact is, that your cosy rose tinted view of what "British culture" is, is a myth, a chimera that never really existed. People like you cling to these old myths because they are scared, scared little people who can't cope with diversity, with people having a different view of life to them, cowards who can't cope with change. I despise people like you. In fact, scratch that, I actually pity you. I wonder what happened in your life to make you so bitter, so angry, so closed off to life that you have to expend so much of your energy in hating your fellow human beings.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Originally posted by giantno1
    thats the problem with liberals turlough, they need everything written down on paper for them. They cant see the proof around them for themselves. Probably due to their pathetic sense of never dying optimism.

    The problem with right wingers is they make things up because their own perception is so twisted by their bitter fucked up logic. Its easier to whinge about "liberals" (don't assume that about me btw, assumptions can be dangerous) than to actual back up your views with facts. :rolleyes:
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Originally posted by BeckyBoo
    Come on Blagsta, either debate or dont post.
    Why do you always do stuff like this ? I aint read all the thread and I dont know who's said what but really is there any need for that reply ?
    This is the politics forum for debate, bout time you realised that.

    Because I like mocking right wingers. Their opinions are laughable. Read the thread.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Originally posted by turlough
    aladin, i think you've built sich a left wing reputation about yourself that everything you say has to be left wing anything to the right is wrong, what do you mean asylum is not a problem, it's not that we hate seeing blacks walkin down the street, we are annoyed at the fact that an illegal immigrants take up outr tax money, get away with crime etc wen the problem wud be about 25% less without them, there's so many bad implications connected with them, your utopian ideas are clearly outnumbered, just wise up

    Did you know the largest ethnic minority group in the UK is the Irish ;)
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Originally posted by Blagsta
    Their opinions are laughable.

    So laugh to yourself, dont waste a post on

    ha ha ha ha ha oh stuff it I cant be arsed to do that many ha's.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Originally posted by BeckyBoo
    So laugh to yourself, dont waste a post on

    ha ha ha ha ha oh stuff it I cant be arsed to do that many ha's.

    The joys of ctrl+c and ctrl+v :D
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Originally posted by Blagsta
    Thats why he produces Eminem I suppose? :rolleyes:

    And also signed him to his own record label, truly an act of vicious racism, signing up the kid and making him into a multi-millionaire.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    thats the problem with liberals turlough, they need everything written down on paper for them. They cant see the proof around them for themselves. Probably due to their pathetic sense of never dying optimism.

    In young, leftist peer-groups, the worst crime is to be a bigot or , heaven forbid, show any racist tendencies. The only way that findings prejudicial to an ethnic group could be discussed would be if they were given academic credence, discussion thereafter would be permissable . They are thought-clamped, poor lambs.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Oh dear, you really do live in a bizarre fantasy world, don't you?
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Attempting to be impartial, however impossible for me that may be, I remind you solo that the characteristics of a liberal, like in Blagsta's case, dictate him to take even the slightest hint of racism or discontent with ethnic minorities to be biggotry. It's like I said before, a well known characteristic of right-wing papers is to exaggurate whilst left-wing papers trivialise. The only thing is, the phrase "better be safe than sorry" does not fit in to the tendancy to trivialise important matters.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Impartial? You? You're the one ranting about how terrible it is that groups of Arabs go on the bus! Unbelievable!
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    BTW are you using the term "liberal" in the American sense or the European sense?
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Why don't you actually engage with the points made, rather than making snide comments using terms that you understand poorly at best?
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Originally posted by giantno1
    we have hundreds of different nationalitites and cultures entering the UK which wasnt the case 1000 fucking years ago.


    Er...do you actually know how this island became populated?
    an Arab muslim is just about to go on trial for housing hundreds of pounds of explosives.

    1. "An" - i.e. this means one, a measurement less that two but more than zero. Given the hordes you seem to think are coming into the country are you really prepared to base a judgement on a whole race on the actions of a single person?

    2. The "hundreds of pounds" of explosives would fit into a shoe heel. Guess it must be a BIG shoe.
    1000 years ago explosives hardly existed and violent muslim people were not migrating to the UK, so why the fuck talk about 1000 years ago? The problem is now not then.

    1000 years ago, we were the violent invaders.

    ~~~~~~~~~~~

    You know, I've just sat and read the entire thread and you have yet to back up any of your assertions with fact. It's all conjecture.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Originally posted by Blagsta
    BTW are you using the term "liberal" in the American sense or the European sense?

    I mean liberal in an American sense, i.e. New Liberalism, not classic European liberalism. All this shit you're saying about the "richer few" taking advantage of the poor majority and how you wish everybody to be considered as socially equal when many people do not deserve to be considered as such.

    Man of Kent, the amount of explosives found in this man's house is not the issue but the fact that explosives were found. You think that if a peadophile was found to have 1000 CD's of child-porn in his house, it would make the fundamental issue any different than if he was found with 100? The figures, in this case, do not matter. The fact that I mentioned any at all was a mistake on my part, but the issue of a man being found with explosives in his house still stands.

    "An" - i.e. this means one, a measurement less that two but more than zero. Given the hordes you seem to think are coming into the country are you really prepared to base a judgement on a whole race on the actions of a single person? Yes it was only one man but you misinterpret my argument. I'm not categorising every immigrant as being a terrorist. I have said time and time again that legal immigrants to this country are more than welcome in my opinion. My concern is with the illegal immigrants. Why are they entering illegally and not going through the process? They obviously have something to hide. And if this is not the case, then why do they wish to get into England so badly? Why not stay in France, Germany, Spain, Italy, Portugal, Austria, Switzerland??? They obviously have some sort of objective by coming specifically to the UK rather than anywhere else in Europe? I agree that most of them are probably here in good intentions but the minority who bring weapons and explosives with them in an attempt to commit terrorist acts must be stopped!! Do you not think so?? My argument is with these people and has been all along!

    "Er...do you actually know how this island became populated?"
    Yes I know very well. Let me remind you of what I said that caused you to reply in this way.
    "we have hundreds of different nationalitites and cultures entering the UK which wasnt the case 1000 fucking years ago."
    I said HUNDREDS. 1000 years ago, the UK was predominatly a mixture of the Anglo-Saxon Germanic people, The Viking people of Sweden and Denmark, The Gealic Celts and the French. Where in the name of fuck do the Arab, Asian or African countries come into this? 1000 years ago, we were a mixture of about 5 nationalities, now we are mixture of hundreds. This is not necessarily a bad thing, but I'm backing up my original quote that you had trouble with.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Originally posted by giantno1
    Yes it was only one man but you misinterpret my argument. I'm not categorising every immigrant as being a terrorist. I have said time and time again that legal immigrants to this country are more than welcome in my opinion. My concern is with the illegal immigrants.

    In this case, he wasn't an illegal immigrant. So your whole point about him is irrelevant.
    the minority who bring weapons and explosives with them in an attempt to commit terrorist acts must be stopped!! Do you not think so??

    Yes I do, just as I did for the Irish who came over here armed, doesn't mean that I label or condemn the majority.

    1000 years ago, the UK was predominatly a mixture of the Anglo-Saxon Germanic people, The Viking people of Sweden and Denmark, The Gealic Celts and the French. Where in the name of fuck do the Arab, Asian or African countries come into this? 1000 years ago, we were a mixture of about 5 nationalities, now we are mixture of hundreds. This is not necessarily a bad thing, but I'm backing up my original quote that you had trouble with.

    Indeed the mix is wider. Had transport been easier 1000 years ago, I doubt it would have been any different to what we have now though.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Originally posted by BlackArab
    Did you know the largest ethnic minority group in the UK is the Irish ;)

    Sorry Black Arab, you're wrong. Figures from the genral Census of 2001 show that 3% of the British population is made up of muslim ethnic minorities while only 1.2% is Irish.

    Man of Kent, the man in question was not an illegal immigrant but a British citizen. However, I was using him as an example to illustrate my point. If the government is prepared to give passports to people like this then I urge them to be more careful and srict with immigration in general. Almost the entire police force in Birminham is being called up, as I write, to defend the city against suspected terrorist attacks. Where do these attacks come from? Immigrants thats who. Legal or illegal, Irish or Muslim it doesn't matter. There has to be a tighter policy of control to prevent immigrants, wherever they come from, from abusing the system not only by not working and contributing to the economy but also from committing attrocious terrorist acts that affect the legitimate British population. This was my original point. I am aware that the people I speak of are only a minority in the UK but, nevertheless, they and immigration have to be more tightly controlled in order to avoid social catastrophe in the future.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    I dont think many people would disaggree that illegal immigration, is in tha main something that this country should try and avoid. However there are, as has been pointed out industries that just couldnt survive without it. And if you dont believe me on this, do a check on what happened to Aspen one season when they clamped down, a lot of the hotels just couldnt open, even in the height of the season.

    But I think the point that some of us are trying to make and the one that you seem unable to grasp is the scale of the problem. There are no 'floods' or 'tides' or whatever other loaded term you wish to use. In real terms immigration is a NON issue.

    And just because you dont like the look of people because they wear burkas or "stand about on the street" does not mean to country is on the way to ruin. I suggest you look closely at your attitude and work out why you hate these people for what appears to be no reason other than skin tone.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Those potential terrorist attacks would come from British citizens just as likely as not.

    Many if not most of the people arrested under the new anti-terrorism act during the last 2 years are born and raised in Britain.
This discussion has been closed.