Home Politics & Debate
If you need urgent support, call 999 or go to your nearest A&E. To contact our Crisis Messenger (open 24/7) text THEMIX to 85258.
Read the community guidelines before posting ✨
Options

BBC 'run by women'

1246

Comments

  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    But haven't men always done that, everywhere and everytime?

    Yeah, of course we have. At the moment though men are being conned into thinking there is something wrong with enjoying the beauty of good looking women and to be this horrible halfy-halfy fucked >metrosexual< up mess.

    It's also ludicrous of women to expect men to act as though they aren't attracted to what they are attracted to. That's where the peoblem lies, in expecting men to basically, not be men. Or to be ashamed of what they are.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Lets face it, men and women are generally horny creatures, we also know what's aestheticsally pleasing and what's not. And however wrong these magazines are there is a market out there for them, so like it or lump it.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Toadborg wrote:
    But haven't men always done that, everywhere and everytime?

    No.
    Toadborg wrote:
    But surely that just reflects the development of the media, quite probably it is a current marketing fashion that will die away in time, just a fad.

    I'd hope so, but in the mean time its really unhealthy. Look at Playboy marketing stuff to kids etc. Its a product of capitalism and something that Marx pointed out over 150 years ago - relationships are transformed into commercial transactions. Only last night my flat mate was on about "being in the market" for a woman and being "in competition" with other blokes. This is profoundly dehumanising. As companies seek to constantly expand markets and constantly increase profit, we're going to see more of this in future I reckon.
    Toadborg wrote:
    Porn in general has been a round as long as modern media has.

    Yes, it has, and longer. However it is only relatively recently that it has become more socially acceptable and available and more and more violent.
    Toadborg wrote:
    More to blame than anyhting is the internet really......

    Thats a simplistic answer though - the internet is a communication tool, thats all. So what are the social, economic and cultural processes that lead to porn becoming more violent and socially acceptable?
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Blagsta wrote:
    So what are the social, economic and cultural processes that lead to porn becoming more violent and socially acceptable?

    A branch off from the 60's hippy movement? where sexual freedom was generally accepted and celebrated, then porn moguls used that to their own means in the following decades.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    ever thought some of these people might like the attention it gets them?

    Oh yes, I'm perfectly aware that some people seek self-validation in such a way. I don't think they are happy deep down though, human beings tend to feel valued more for something they've achieved rather than an accident of nature.
    self-degradation is part of human nature in a strange way

    Yes, does this make it a desirable thing?
    :s most men dont care either way if nuts existed or not.

    well it seems to be rather popular
    objectification happens to both sexes these days in the media, it's part of the media and always will be i presume,

    Does this make it right? And its not just in the media, its in the whole way that society treats women - women are socialised to be looked at ("male gaze") in a way that men aren't.
    outside of the media, i think its even more pointless however some people value good looks so it will always exist.

    Thats not really what I'm mean.
    i'd like it if a good character was more recognised by everyone things would be better sadly only cocky cunts tend to be it seems cause they make themselves noticed

    You've lost me. :confused:
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    turlough wrote:
    Lets face it, men and women are generally horny creatures, we also know what's aestheticsally pleasing and what's not. And however wrong these magazines are there is a market out there for them, so like it or lump it.

    No, thats not what I mean.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    turlough wrote:
    A branch off from the 60's hippy movement? where sexual freedom was generally accepted and celebrated, then porn moguls used that to their own means in the following decades.

    Still too simplistic. Totally ignores any economics.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Was dicussing the idea of women taking over the world with Mum and she said she agreed and feels sorry for men these days. I suggested that men and women are perfectly capable of doing the same jobs (obviously limits are drawn when it comes to heavy labour), but she said that if men did jobs that were traditionally 'female' jobs, like cleaning, secretarial work then families wouldn't be able to afford to live when the woman goes on maternity leave.

    Personally, I don't believe that I should not be the primary breadwinner because I have a vagina. Also, aren't men just as capable of raising children as women? Perhaps then we're facing a nature vs. nurture debate.

    I disagree with the original point of the thread and am about to watch the program about women in the BBC to see whether the guy has a point, or whether he feels threatened now because of female equality.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Blagsta wrote:
    Still too simplistic. Totally ignores any economics.

    Maybe because the economic system doesn't have anything to do with it in the end?

    As far as I am aware porn is accepted and is as widely available in the social democracies of europe as it is in the more capitalist US?

    As for your friend talking about competing for a woman, this is urely a fact of nature, males always compete for females and often vice versa also........
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Blagsta wrote:
    Still too simplistic. Totally ignores any economics.

    Where does economics fit into the equation then?
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    turlough wrote:
    Where does economics fit into the equation then?

    Where doesn't it? Its a billion dollar industry for a start.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Toadborg wrote:
    Maybe because the economic system doesn't have anything to do with it in the end?

    Are you serious?
    Toadborg wrote:
    As far as I am aware porn is accepted and is as widely available in the social democracies of europe as it is in the more capitalist US?

    Europe is capitalist.
    Toadborg wrote:
    As for your friend talking about competing for a woman, this is urely a fact of nature, males always compete for females and often vice versa also........

    I've certainly never "competed" for a woman.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Blagsta wrote:
    Where doesn't it? Its a billion dollar industry for a start.

    what about the people who lend it to their mates? or the people who run small sites that list free things?
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    what about the people who lend it to their mates?
    or the people who run small sites that list free things?

    Irrelevant, and free porn sites are funded by adverts, advertising pay porn sites.

    Are you denying its a billion dollar industry?
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Blagsta wrote:
    Where doesn't it? Its a billion dollar industry for a start.

    Ok, sex is a billion dollar industry. Why does it have to be more violent then? Where does economics fit into that equation?
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Blagsta wrote:
    I've certainly never "competed" for a woman.

    You're trying to say you didn't buy your girlfriend off e-bay :razz:
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    turlough wrote:
    Ok, sex is a billion dollar industry. Why does it have to be more violent then? Where does economics fit into that equation?

    I didn't say economics was the only factor. But markets always need to expand, look for something fresh, something new.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Blagsta wrote:
    I didn't say economics was the only factor. But markets always need to expand, look for something fresh, something new.

    Do they not reflect demand though. Public sick off semi-hardcore sex, give them hardcore. I don't think it's a deliberate ploy by these corporations to degrade women even further, they're doing it because we want them to do it. Well sort of anyway
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    turlough wrote:
    Do they not reflect demand though. Public sick off semi-hardcore sex, give them hardcore. I don't think it's a deliberate ploy by these corporations to degrade women even further, they're doing it because we want them to do it. Well sort of anyway

    Again, its not so simple a relationship. I don't think that late capitalism operates purely on market demand - companies and advertising also create desire. I mean, who the hell wanted a phone with a camera in until they were advertised? And no, I don't think it's necessarily a deliberate ploy (although some of the stuff on the net is sick beyond belief, Max Hardcore etc), but its the outcome of a market driven business*. Its selling human beings as if they were pieces of meat, I don't know about you, but to me, that shit ain't right.

    [edit]
    *by this I don't necessarily mean a market demand, what I mean is the need for companies to continually expand markets and to increase profit.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Blagsta wrote:
    Again, its not so simple a relationship. I don't think that late capitalism operates purely on market demand - companies and advertising also create desire. I mean, who the hell wanted a phone with a camera in until they were advertised? And no, I don't think it's necessarily a deliberate ploy (although some of the stuff on the net is sick beyond belief, Max Hardcore etc), but its the outcome of a market driven commodity. Its selling human beings as if they were pieces of meat, I don't know about you, but to me, that shit ain't right.

    Fair enough, I think with the sex industry it's a mixture of the two tbh.

    Yea it may not be right but sex sells, that's the reality, not much you can do about it.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    turlough wrote:
    Fair enough, I think with the sex industry it's a mixture of the two tbh.

    Yea it may not be right but sex sells, that's the reality, not much you can do about it.

    You appear to have completely missed the point, but never mind, I got to the shop to get some dinner.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Blagsta wrote:
    You appear to have completely missed the point, but never mind, I got to the shop to get some dinner.

    What point have I missed?
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    To be honest, I think the decline of male orientated jobs has more to do with technology and factories moving abroad than women. It's capitalism that's changing society.

    Also, telling a man he has to work and can't be sensitive is as bad as telling a woman she can't work or adopt any 'male' traits. Men are just as oppressed by society as women are, but it appears that it's consumerism that's oppressing them, it's the media and secularisation.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    turlough wrote:
    What point have I missed?

    Its not just that "sex sells", its that capitalism has commodified human beings and human relationships. People are treated as commodities to be bought and sold, relationships have been reified, treated as material goods to be bought and sold. As The Pop Group sang in 1979 - we are all prostitutes.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    To be honest, I think the decline of male orientated jobs has more to do with technology and factories moving abroad than women. It's capitalism that's changing society.

    Yes, this is very true. The changes in the labour market over the past 20 or so years, with more women working etc, is partly a result of feminism, but also a result of capitalist neo-liberal policies.
    Also, telling a man he has to work and can't be sensitive is as bad as telling a woman she can't work or adopt any 'male' traits. Men are just as oppressed by society as women are, but it appears that it's consumerism that's oppressing them, it's the media and secularisation.

    Ulitimately its an economic system that rewards competition, individualism and expolitation that oppresses men and women, i.e. capitalism.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Blagsta wrote:
    Its not just that "sex sells", its that capitalism has commodified human beings and human relationships. People are treated as commodities to be bought and sold, relationships have been reified, treated as material goods to be bought and sold. As The Pop Group sang in 1979 - we are all prostitutes.

    I agree, I wasn't saying "sex sells" as a belief, I said it as an observation in relation to a common perception we all have these days, and there's nothing we can do about that perception to the masses.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Did anybody else watch it and think that his arguements wrre painfully average?
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    So the metrosexual men of today fit the stereotype of a 'butch' man? When a lot of them are adopting looks and styles from the gay scene?

    So some men dress "camp" and groom themselves regularly. Wow. What relation does that have to my post?
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    How exactly does one become "more effeminate"? You're either effeminate or you aren't, and it doesn't really matter either way in modern society.

    Because it's fashionable and different to how men used to be. Do you think that in the fifties men went to get their cuticles done?
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Do you think that in the fifties men went to get their cuticles done?

    Almost certainly...it was a different society back then, it's hardly as though males developed this new metrosexual gene in the past decade. It's just acceptable these days, and I think it's down to attitudes among society
Sign In or Register to comment.