If you need urgent support, call 999 or go to your nearest A&E. To contact our Crisis Messenger (open 24/7) text THEMIX to 85258.
Read the community guidelines before posting ✨
Options
Essential support for under 25s
Essential support for under 25s
Take a look around and enjoy reading the discussions. If you'd like to join in, it's really easy to register and then you'll be able to post. If you'd like to learn what this place is all about, head here.
Comments
Really folks, this is becoming quite racist...they want more than one wife at the same time...I say they deserve the bloody tax break. A few other breaks might be in order as well but we're talking about alla's chosen ones here, not some tadpole in the swamp.
Imagine what they could do with sattelite television in the great caliph...their hooded wives would gang up on the poor devils and kill them while watching "Gilligans Island" or some such thing.
:crazyeyes
Oh so you didn't say that muslims could fuck off if they don't like British laws?
I could have sworn you did Lukesh.
Should all the millions of people who don't like ID cards fuck o0ff as well then Lukesh?
Well?
why shouldn't we accept this then
and luke, in your opinion, is there a difference between british culture and white culture and what is it.
Answer the question. Did you, or did you not say that muslims who don't like British laws should just fuck off?
Yes or no will do.....
yes i am actually.
So when did this 'British culture' begin? After which conquest? At which time?
Britain is a lot older than Christianity mate... which, may I add originated from the Middle East and was brought over by immigrants.
will you answer the question
The question, which I do believe has been asked several times of you already by several people (including myself), is what you feel is this 'British Culture' you are defending.
If you accept that the culture of these islands has been constantly and continually changing (almost always because of immigration and foreign influences), then what exactly is different about *now*?
entertaining in a very frustrating way.
are you the missing link?
people rightly ask you a question and you throw abuse at them ...thats not how it works i'm afraid.
is this how you behave in the real world?
If he did it's an attitude I would support about this.
Britain has not recognised polygamy for hundreds of years, polygamy is illegal, so there should be no tax breaks to condone such behaviour.
well that isnt legally recognised here since it would be making an exception to the rule, which does noone any favours so he should make do.....
Answer the question.
Bending laws to make life easier for people of certain religions as has been the case with relaxing the laws relating to halal meat for example is very different to fully incorporating sharia law into British domestic law – which Muslim leaders according to the Times article are campaigning for. British domestic law has not incorporated Sikh law, Jewish law or any other religious law in recent times as far as I know. I do not believe it would be possible to incorporate Islamic sharia law without incorporating other religious laws, and doing that would almost certainly create contradictions and jeopardise some of the rights and freedoms all citizens take for granted.
No incorporation of religious laws please and no treating different religions differently in relation to marriage laws...
For once I'm kinda agreeing with Kermit.
You sir, I bow to.
We've already had homosexual parteners campaigning for the right to enjoy the same tax privileges as married people, as well as close kin. A more equitable distribution amongst multiple significant others, as long as the beneft to the 'taxee' is unaltered, doesn't seem unworkable, or to have any implications for criminal law.
polygamy is illegal in this country so someone whose done it abroad should get no tax breaks
If these people want to have ten women, and consider them all wives, then fair enough. But only one of them can be a legal wife in the UK, and that is the way it should remain.
Homosexual partners are a different issue.
Sorry... I don't always write clearly.
I mean that there has been so much immigration in and out of the UK (if you can call invasions 'immigration?).
Now Christianity does originate from the Middle East (note to anyone who's interested, Catholicism was not the first denomination, Gnosticism is) or there abouts, even if there have been changes in the scriptures along the way. But it was not created in the UK.
But if it weren't for say... Roman, Anglo Saxon, Norman invasions we wouldn't be the country we are today. We wouldn't have the same language, the same culture, the same food... Maybe we wouldn't be as wealthy.
What I was asking was at what time did British culture become to your liking?
And why do you believe Christianity to be a big part of it if it doesn't even come from our own shores?
"YOU" personally did not but no-one argued with the blatent racist comment you made.
Now, how can a jibe against the Dutch, even if it wasn't intended as a tongue-in-cheek rebuttal of Diesel's link (charting the rise of (neo-?)fascism in Holland), be racist? I didn't even say that all Dutch people are weeners...