If you need urgent support, call 999 or go to your nearest A&E. To contact our Crisis Messenger (open 24/7) text THEMIX to 85258.
Read the community guidelines before posting ✨
Options
Freemasonry...
This discussion has been closed.
Essential support for under 25s
Comments
And how is it, a few members on this forum just talk and offer no evidence to the contrary.
Come on, at least try to prove the articles wrong.
Did you see the 'david cameron hosted a freemason event'?
Do you know who he is?
Would a non-freemason host a freemason event? now for one second think........
Could this dickhead who comes here telling us about freemasons, be telling the truth?..
People are showing themselves to be duff indeed.
cuntish
Cuntish
cuntish
Cunty cunt cunt cuntish.
People are not 'childish' in this thread, far from it. Take a look at the thread you started and this specifically
Now our piccolo is one smart woman. Couple of degrees (if not more) to her name, excellent standard of education and use of the English language, i could go on.
You came up against someone who knows a fucking hell of a lot more than what you do and you backed off and kept wanking your nut about proof whislt never offering (except cut n paste jobbies off the net) yourself. You, as pic says, clearly have an agenda to force your views on people wether they like it or not. If not, then you just debase your *cough* argument *cough* to pathetic, 'childish' name calling.
Just another sad little troll resorting to personal insults because your toys fell out the pram.
I'm sure there's a nice, slimey rock for you to crawl under somewhere where you sit with your wi-fi, your little tin hat and your Obeservers Book of Why No One Likes Me.
Stop replying. You're only making it worse for yourself, this is what he want.
Why does everyone keep banging on about tin hats??
Its to stop the aliens who posed as egyptian gods and started the freemasons who apparently still run everything except when the don't from reading your mind.
Ll
Fluxed, it's sad you really believe all of what you're writing, but it's quite clear to everyone else here that it's jumpsuit. But let's sum it up
There is no massive conspiracy led by the freemasons. They are an old boy's club where people network. There was a time when people in the masons would use their connections to get away with things in court, but not anymore. The amount of evidence needed to get someone to court and the scrutiny the judiciary and cps are under means anyone using a connection to escape justice is going to get found out.
Don't let Fluxed stop you from being worried about the Freemasons.
You only have to look at Propaganda Due in Italy to understand what can happen with any secretive club.
But do I think the Freemasons are secretly running the world in some sinister plot? Nah.
I think my summary of a few on here, speaks for itself.
As i said, i post the research, it is for you to take it or leave it.
No skin.
http://www.intmensorg.info/bbc.htm
''Anyone catching the new BBC drama 'Dancing on the Edge' last night on BBC2 at 9.00 pm may have been surprised to find mention of freemasons about half way through the first episode. Although this was a period piece set in the 1930's it showed clearly how even then the British establishment were steeped in freemasonry before the last war.
Quote "We also depicted the Masons having their meetings in the basement. This continued until quite recently in fact – the Café Royal being one example. I discovered Masonic temples in the basement underneath when I was researching another project many years ago so I know this to be true."
You can find the episode HERE on BBC iplayer. A very rare occasion when the BBC dare to broach the subject of freemasons running London.''
Or option 3, pick holes in it. Are allowed to do that?
Which one of the articles were you referring to as "substantiated evidence". Was it a) "hypocritical feminist leaning BBC promote male stripping" or b) "BBC: where the paedo's (sic) and druggies reside"; or maybe it was c) "Paedo protecting BBC and UK's thug cops persecution tactics".
Such a sane website.
Tell you what fux0red, why don't you piss off back to the beacons of sanity TPUC and VigilantCitizen where you normally post?
Yep, that's sane
I host events with GPs but I'm not a GP. So you point is what?
Once again though, like all conspiracy nuts with zero actual evidence, you ignore anything which any of us have asked or said. So I ask again, a simple question. If the Freemasons are all powerful and part of a massive far reaching conspiracy, which includes speeding tickets, how are you getting away with "exposing" them and why haven't those website been taken down?
Surely theirs (and your) very existence completely underlines your basic assertion.
To pick holes, one must supply some form of evidence to the contrary, not just blart out
words for the sake of it.
From the start i have told only, that the monarchy are the source of all corruption.
I have backed this up by stating that the monarchy heads freemasonry.
I proved this. But it seems a Duke is not the monarchy.
Why did no-one appologize for rubbishing my words, even though
i proved myself to be speaking the truth?
/?män?rk/
Noun
A sovereign head of state, esp. a king, queen, or emperor.
You haven't proved anything you loon. If you prove things, people change their minds.
No, to pick holes one must find holes. And you have allowed us to find many.
I'm guessing English is not your first language which is fair enough. But this may explain you misunderstanding the point. That doesn't back up anything, you've just stated your opinion. Calling something a fact because it's your opinion is called 'circular reasoning'.
You have not spoken 'the truth'. You've given your opinions and selectively chosen obscure and biased websites as a source of reference because they back up what you're saying. That does not mean what they (or you) are saying are 'facts'.
It was based as factual. I was hoping you would note the point -
''It showed clearly how even then the British establishment were steeped in freemasonry before the last war.''
And regarding your push, no is the simple answer.
When people look through this thread, they will judge the substance.
They will note members like you, who use immoral language / tone,
as a cover for their lacking knowledge on subjects they involve
themselves in, yet know nothing about.
So i can only say grow up. Read it or remove yourself. simple
Stop being a twat and insulting people becuse their opinion doesn't agree with yours. Makes you look like a cunt.
It might have been based as factual, but it was a fictional program.
Again, IQ comes into question.
You host events with GPs but your not a GP.
Complete superfluous tripe.
Don't try using duff analogies to justify your position.
David Cameron hosted a freemason event, alone, as the host.
Understand.
To host anything, one must have a very good understanding.
With this, and the facts i have displayed ( monarchy head freemasons. heads of police . ceremonial nonsense, tapping doors
with canes in parliament - these are freemason rituals.
Forget it Slartibartfast. As i said, you will be made to look like
a div who is in denial of fact ( outwardly...hmmm..... ).
Ok, lets start again Mr clever,
Do you agree the monarchy head freemasonry?
Mr F, I suggest you start coming up with actual fact and analysis. You need to realise that you are fobbing off people who are providing logic and reasoning. You are fobbing off other people by being rude and not providing any serious counter arguments. Whenever people disagree with you, you provide little evidence and get quite childish in your responses.
I would like to see hard irrefutable evidence of your claims, and even if you can, you are coming across as a bit of a deluded person to many people in here. I'm not saying you are, but just suppose hypothetically that you didn't think the way you do and if you saw some of your posts on here, would you honestly think that they would sway someone with the argument you are trying to make?
I'm being honest when I say that you are coming across as a rather deluded person. I'm neither saying you are wrong or you are right, just simply that I can't agree with your point of view until you offer some credible evidence other than the circular argument you are currently undertaking. If you want to be taken seriously you have to counter peoples arguments rather than brushing them aside and just repeating your self. Trying to avoid certain issues just makes you look evasive and unable to answer questions in a serious manner. This is the last post I will make on this matter, as I do believe that you cant seem to get involved in any form of discussion and that you take any questioning of your beliefs as a personal insult, and that you must always be right, which I do not believe you are. It is not up to me to disprove you, however if you make an assertion, the responsibility is on you to prove it, and so far I have not seen one post of yours that has done that. I think most if not all people agree with me. This place is about the discussion of thoughts and ideas and is not intended as a pulpit for people to constantly preach on about views and try and belittle people who question your views. If you don't feel like you are getting anywhere with your posts, how do you think many people in here feel?
Like I said, I will say nothing more on this matter as I believe I'm fighting a losing battle, not in the way that I think you are right, just that I think you are inclined to ignore anything that doesn't agree with your frankly scary and deluded ideas. If you like your websites and consider them fact, maybe you should have a look at the following, and realise that whilst freemasons might want to rule the world, that doesn't mean they do.
http://www.cracked.com/article_17469_5-pathetic-groups-that-people-think-rule-world.html
Don't you feel shame? People will read this and see , all
you offer is tripe, in the face of hard evidence.
''The Duke of Kent, who is the head of Freemasonry in England Wales.''
http://beaconsfield.buckinghamshireadvertiser.co.uk/2010/08/duke-of-kent-praises-freemason.html
Rest my case there.
And, mr clever....
Former Home Secretary Jack Straw tried to address the issue of Freemasons working in the criminal justice system. In 1999, new judges were required to publicly disclose whether they were Masons.
But after a ruling from the European Court of Human Rights, the requirement was dropped in 2009. Police officers have a voluntary requirement to disclose - but only to their superiors.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-17272611
About this....
Do you know who Jack Straw is ?
Do you know what a judge is?
But look people, see what tripe this G-Raffe puts on the table.
And they never find the maturity to appologize for their stupor.
Childish. Grow up.
It is a serious reflection of how these monarchs treat the
privaliged slaves with pure contempt.
It is a serious connection with sexual abuse hence why i said
grow up.
You think the monarchs are so nice huh? Even though they enslaved
our grandparents and their parents and so on.
They took the land and exploited it, as they did with the
people.
So, perhaps you could explain what happended to this news
story some years ago and why the witness died;
?Queen Elizabeth and Prince Phillip have been directly accused of being present at such a school when 10 kids went missing?
?An official inquiry was due to hear testimony in a few months from the last surviving witness to see the Queen with those kids.
?That last witness died this week in mysterious circumstances.?
http://inpursuitofhappiness.wordpress.com/2011/03/13/the-queen-and-missing-kids/
In time, people will see the facts about the masons and the monarchs.