If you need urgent support, call 999 or go to your nearest A&E. To contact our Crisis Messenger (open 24/7) text THEMIX to 85258.
Options
Take a look around and enjoy reading the discussions. If you'd like to join in, it's really easy to register and then you'll be able to post. If you'd like to learn what this place is all about, head here.
Comments
it shows in your continued lack ...total lack, of any kind of contribution to this thread aside from petty snipes.
There's fuck all worth contributing to. Snide comments at paranoid fools is the best its gonna get.
http://www.tms.org/pubs/journals/JOM/0112/Eagar/Eagar-0112.html
This explains it better than I can. Suffice to say the main structure holding up the building wasn't four spoons at each corner, but one large spoon in the middle.
Using that principle as a blanket over every issue is hardly a commendable approach.
Personally i reckon if there's any foul play, the attacks were probably carried by radical Islamicists unwittingly handled by the CIA although i have been looking at the more elaborate conspiratorial theories recently with an open mind - as anyone should before passing comment.
In other words, as previously repeatedly pointed out, they needed an event so traumatizing to the American psyche that an enduring paradigm of a global shadowy and neverending Al Qaeda boogeyman threat could be erected and readily swallowed to replace the previous Cold War mythology in which these ideologues had cemented their power base in Washington.
With the capabilities clearly available no further afield than the US MIC/intelligence community itself and the cover of a War on Terror needed to justify every subsequent planned aspect of the PNAC's brazenly documented agenda of renewed US militancy for generations to come, 911 was an event whose multiple elements were not matters to be left to chance and convenient coincidence.
if you look at this picture taken from your link ...
the floors can collapse but ...the inner core is made of forty seven vertical steel uprights ...denied by the 9/11 commision and presented as a hollow box section ...since discredited ...these uprights should have remained.
the fires were small enough for fire fighters to be standing by them ...the fires did not spread from floor to floor ...
no steel structured building before or since has behaved in such a manner.
three did that day.
Whats more likely? Islamicist nutters (known to exist and to carry out terrorist attacks) or remote control 767's and a vast all encompasing conspiracy?
This is my view too.
I've looked at the "evidence". It doesn't stand up.
Where you getting your info from?
No one's flown a fully laden 767 into a building before.
So whats more plausible...
Pilots whose own instructors have sworn that they could not fly so much as a cessna not only blindly piloting (by further credentialled testimony provided by MR's pasted rebuttal) four commercial aircraft, with aerial maneuvres requiring military pilot training and experience, into specific targets via only complex instrumentation guidance (also requiring significant training).
A boogeyman threat of such magnitude and global capability that there are supposedly sleeper cells everywhere and yet no valid court-proven convictions to be had in 4 years of the WoT of clear unequivocal link to Al Qaeda nor the multiplicity of attacks we should expect to have occured (near weekly if the magnitude be true) across the US to date. Or that our agencies which are so inept as to have dropped the ball on 911 and again in Iraq are yet capabale of having supposedly foiled all the attacks a determined organisation like AL Qaeda should have attempted to date?
just to name a few scant aspects of implausibility...
Or that it was very much a technically capable and internally orschestrated charade in keeping with the very agenda we have all watched being carried out since 911 (documented and detailed in its intentions well before 911) by a deeply ideologically driven cabal right in the seat of power in Washington?
Occam's razor favors the latter. Mental zombies like blagsta favour whatever they are told by their trusted authority figures.
The analyses provided previously are more than sufficient for any rational mind to realise how much a sham the oft asserted threat is and who it is who best fits the three fundamentals of any criminal investigation - means, motive and opportunity.
they would have pressumed what they were doing was a simple exercise.
then they realised what they had done was for real ...and found themselves sealed in and cut off from the world.
then ...boom!
:eek:
1. The case against Mobil Oil and James Giffen on illegal oil swaps between Iran and Kazakhstan (at the time before the NY Grand Jury - Syemor Hersh, New Yorker Magazine, July 9th 2001 edition);
and more critically
2. The case against Alan Greenspan, Morgan & Company, Goldman Sachs into illegal gold price fixing
were kept.
With the destruction of the building went all the evidence against powerful financial interests profitting handsomely from our Middle Eastern resource wars.
This is hilarious
do you actualy have any ideas of your own ...about anything whatsoever?
sorry but i don't just believe clan ...i actualy go to the trouble of ...reading!
i have supplied engineers pilots etc etc ...what do you deem to be an independant source?
you remind me more and more of lukesh/walkindude.
Well then, we'd all best just cease from ever questioning any and all official claims that have any greater bearing on the our collective futures than the condition of public rail networks or how mayors should be treated for making offhand comments at social gatherings.
Oh how lame and intellectually complacent our little blagsta must be.
Again, for those with more rational capability, the research is quite recognisably objective and point based, reviewing the official claims made and supplying the widely and publically researched discreditation whereever the record clearly does not substantiate the official line.
That is nothing more than one would expect nor find in any thorough investigative effort for any major crime.
Poor desperate blagsta.
But feel free to tithe to me if you wish, the income is always welcome
No point in reading if you don't also think.
No you haven't. You've supplied quotes from conspiracy sites. You have no idea who these supposed "engineers" and "pilots" are.
Thanks for playing, NEXT contestant!