If you need urgent support, call 999 or go to your nearest A&E. To contact our Crisis Messenger (open 24/7) text THEMIX to 85258.
Read the community guidelines before posting ✨
Options
Essential support for under 25s
Essential support for under 25s
Take a look around and enjoy reading the discussions. If you'd like to join in, it's really easy to register and then you'll be able to post. If you'd like to learn what this place is all about, head here.
Comments
I can’t use PDF for reasons of software environment and hardware config, but you would rather post sarcasm than enquire why?
You are unlikely to discover anything other than your own large intestine!
Its much in the way that I agree with Chomsky on his assessments of public perception management via mainstream media but diverge sharply with him on questions of 911.
I don’t understand how anybody could take the flip-flopping fool seriously after that.
The point of the link is to examine the oversights and feeble presumptions of the NIST report, which blag has so characteristically thrown up without an likely scrutiny whatosoever.
Going back to remote control technology being quite long in existence i also present this NASA/FAA test conducted as far back as 1984 using a Boeing 720 under remote guidance...
http://www.dfrc.nasa.gov/gallery/photo/CID/index.html
I would also point you to a certain Dov Zakheim, founding PNAC member (PNAC agenda signatory) and Undersecretary of Defence and CFO of the Defence Department. His prior corporate role was Corporate Vice President of Systems Planning (Sysplan) Corp, which developed, for military use, a remote guidance and control system applicable to any class of aircraft called FTS (Flight Termination System) in 2000.
So much for "non-existent".
Bait and switch.
Two men can have a secret deal as long as one of them is dead.
The NIST report, like its FEMA counterparts are nothing more than expected federal whitewashes as have been all administration controlled excuses for investigations into 911 to date.
Nice to see how you've completely sidestepped the substantiation of autonomous flight control technology, though. Quite telling of your own preference to avoid uncomfortable fact.
How do you arrive at this conclusion when the "official" coverstory would have you believe that 19 arab hijackers , backed by additional shadowy planners, managed to not only evade standard US intercept protocols (Al Qaeda now controls US air defences eh?) but also strike the most heavily guarded military installation (Pentagon) in the world without a single SAM missile being fired.
No BB, only a handful of senior officials needed to be party to the actual planning with all other actors on that day simply acting as usual without any knowledge than what they were doing was part of the several ongoing drills they were trained to conduct. Much more plausible than the official farce.
I was being polite calling him “this guy”. For several years he argued vociferously that no 757 had hit the Pentagon. Then, with the same evidence, he changed position and began to argue that a 757 had indeed hit the Pentagon. He’s a joke and a fool and a fraudster and nobody in their right mind would take him seriously. And I’m supposed to treat him like some kind of authoritative source on the collapse of WTC7?
If somebody was to make a big song and dance about having found the Loch Ness Monster, only for it to turn out to be an old boot floating in a canal, you’d have to be pretty dopey to get all excited when the same person claimed to have found the Abominable Snowman.
Do you think that, with your dedicated and tireless mouse-clicking and link-following, you’ve discovered some formerly hidden, shocking new facts that proves your theory? NASA experimented with a Boeing 707 in 1984, therefore it follows in logically that in 2001, four remote-controlled 767s were swapped mid-air for passenger airlines? Only in your world.
Keep sidestepping, denial is apparently necessary to protect your precious assumptions of US MIC incapability.
Very few people do believe that, in fact – do you think it’s because everybody except you and people who agree with you are stupid and blinkered?
That's exactly what he thinks. Has he called you "sheeple" yet?
Again, unless you bother to dig into the record of the 4 simultaneous aerial exercises in operation within the same time frame, you are as unlikely to appreciate the number of dummy flights (22 in total) which had Air Traffic controllers confused as which planes were part of the drills and which werent. In that maelstrom, with quite existent defence sector remote flight technology at their disposal (and the absurdities surrounding the alleged hijackers), as "nearly everybody". Public perception management and mainstream burying of relevant information at its finest, nothing more or less.
Being on the bandwagon is undoubtedly comforting and safe, but far from critically vigilant in the slightest.
Once again we simply arrive, for all the glaring inconsistencies of the "official" farce of a story put forward in this thread, to the same wishful refusal to question the status quo that all these discussions invariably lead to.
Have a nice day.
Unstable as ever! :thumb:
At the other, you have the versions of events put forward by assorted male, internet-based obsessives, replete with remote-controlled planes, holograms, you name it.
I'm inclined to think the truth is somewhere in the middle, but I've yet to meet a "9/11 truth-seeker" capable of drawing a line where the facts end and imagination begins.
Try to understand that much of what you have lumped into your critique of 911 research is also active efforts from those with a vested interest in shutting down the independent public investigation so that it cannot advance to a fully judicial investigatory stage.
A critical mind avoids what is factually implausible (autonomous control technology not falling into that category) and concentrates on what is, as I have done all along, demonstrably.
Ah well, anyway back to the issue.
I notice at this juncture that no-one has mentioned Operation Northwoods. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Northwoods
Could this have been a rough blueprint for 9-11? :chin:
So too I imagine ultimately, the independent research, now dubbed "conspiracy theory" will in large part be found to have been completely accurate long after the present band of criminals have retired/died.
Such is the advantage of that wonderful built-in government safeguard "national security" for protecting the real criminals and monsters in their day.
This means that once reclassified, any further dissemination would be deemed a federal crime. Nice way to generate more prisoners for the largest domestic industry in America.
Yeah! Bitchin'!