If you need urgent support, call 999 or go to your nearest A&E. To contact our Crisis Messenger (open 24/7) text THEMIX to 85258.
Options
Take a look around and enjoy reading the discussions. If you'd like to join in, it's really easy to register and then you'll be able to post. If you'd like to learn what this place is all about, head here.
Comments
You haven't provided any evidence. Either provide it or quit whining.
Toadborg has posted a link.
Now, when people post BBC links here, then you don't ask them to point out which line their specific comment is aimed at, as surely you can read so yourself.
Currently you're making an issue out of nothing, and for some reason Matadore and I have nothing better to do than to feed your tantrum.
Seriously, had anyone else written the things you do now, then you'd been in the front line of their crucification.
it's a bit different here...blagstas interpretation of clans anti-zionism views might be different to yours and mats...i think he wants your interpretation of it
If that's the case then he should specify, instead of asking us to do so.
Either way, it's not Clandestine's anti-Zionist notion, but more his linking of Zionism to all of the "world's evils" - which can be seen by "the man himself" if Blagsta bothered to read what he had been served on a silver plate.
If you cannot or will not highlight the exact posts that are "anti-semitic", as you are so fond of complaining Jacq, then you obviously are unable to do so. In my dissertation I footnoted to the page of a book that I was referring to, I didn't tell the examiner to go and read the entire book himself to find the line. That's not how it works.
You raise a point, you highlight the post that your point refers to. It's quite simple.
The saddest story ever told.
It would be funny if these creatures weren't for real.
The page was posted. Not just the link to the thread.
And no, I haven't mentioned any anti-semitism in this thread, as you so often accuse me for. So maybe you should retract that comment?
And btw, they aren't MY views, many others of notable academic and political merit share the same awareness of the rotten ideological core driving the modern state of Israel, its perpetuation of apartheid principles and its very successful media-compliant denigration of all accountability and critique against its practices.
Even many Jews of good conscience recognise this ideological blight on their religious identity and decry it it in similar fashion.
Unfortunately being so immersed in the indoctrination of The Jerusalem Post and Joseph Farah's decontextualised spin, you would fail to appreciate that reality.
I've asked you to provide evidence. You've refused. Now stop whining like a little kid.
You stop acting like one.
Why wasn't Toadborg's link good enough?
Quote the posts that you're referring to. Or quit whinging like a little puppy.
And you expect me to serve you tea as well?
There is a link. Use it as you wish - And yes, it would be easier for me, Matadore or Toadborg to point it out specifically for you, but no, I don't do what I am dictated to do by someone like you.
You seem to be projecting rather a lot.
If you have a specific allegation to make, I expect you to make it, not pussyfoot around. Either make it or shut it.
DO NOT tell me what to do. Especially not in such a patronising tone.
So maybe you take your own advice, until you're capable to communicate like a reasonable human being? Just a suggestion.
I'm asking you to communicate like a reasonable human being. You're refusing to, instead you're behaving like a spoilt brat. Either quote the posts you are referring to or quite whining. Simple.
Well stop doing it then. Seriously.
OK Kermit ~ when does the moment come that an ethnic group can reasonably decide it will preserve it’s ethnic purity (myths following myths Klintock ). I can understand Kermit if you think that we simply will all just get along, since that’s what we’re told, but have you any reason for thinking it so? Has anyone?
People have strong affiliations to family, community, tribe, nation, religion or race and that they fight each other for territory, spoils and sovereignty. Social ‘opponents’ as trivial as suburban neighbours kill one another, why do people expect that races and religions won’t – especially since they do?
So when would it become acceptable for a group to begin excluding outsiders if they were racists and wished to preserve their specific fantasy of unique culture, genetics or tribe. Is it never a valid concern, or valid only at a certain point? When should we help preserve the small forest tribe with a unique history who felt the racist urge to preserve it? Or the whites? Or the Whales?
Here’s a clue Kermit: The only politically correct answer is that we should not care at all about the extinction of races and nations of humans since all are in fact the same - or at least equally worthy. Likewise presumably for all varieties of animal life, plant life - all life. Especially men who read women's forums.
Toadborg: "Yes as a rule I find nationalism to be wrong, absurd, etc......"
Well I’m with you guys (though I find it best for reasons of political correctness to observe publically recognised racialist ideas, while rarely considering racist ones).
Spliffie: "White Nationalism and zionist conspiracy theories are largely one and the same, it's the standard world-view of the far-right. Unless these people can actually show the evidence of the "racial difference" they often rant about, white nationalism doesn't have a basis. Nationalism generally is just an outdated concept."
I’m not with you Spliffie. White Nationalism and zionist conspiracy theories are often partners - like love and marriage, but they are entirely different things, and neither are necessarily right wing.
Also these people aren’t even required to show evidence of the racial differences they rant about - their belief in race (which is difference) is given credence by their government which recognises race and penalises whites for their white race in their access to education, employment and promotion. This justifies their position, just as it would for blacks or jews, because racism is only ever about preferred races.
There's a well known white nationalist and zionist rabbi.
His biog.
Ethnic groups can decide nothing - they don't exist. "groups" never decide anything - the ones who have brainwashed them into thinking they are a group do.
Just as children have a strong tie to Santa. In that situation the real people pulling the strings are the ones who get you to believe.
More myths, also subject to the same law. - Who benefits most from these crazy ideas?
I don't believe in conspiracy theories, but I do know that the banking takeover that occured in the 30's is more or less true, wacky "zionist" theories aside. Do you really think that those at the top of these imagined social structures really believe in them personally? I don't.
im asking ncely could you post it again then please
I am a simple, this is all it takes...
http://vbulletin.thesite.org.uk/showpost.php?p=1350593&postcount=53
http://vbulletin.thesite.org.uk/showpost.php?p=1350681&postcount=89
We all know how those like yourself who ardently defend Herzl's colonialist era apartheid ideology and thus Israel's right to dehumanise the original inhabitants of the region would love to pretend its all a fantasy. Sadly the ideology is quite substantially recognised by repescted minds in politics and academia both inside and outside Israel for its beligerent militaristic mindset.
Anything else youd care to discuss about my posts, do so with with me. I am perfectly capable of speaking for myself, thanks.
Oh yes, and Blagsta, about subscribing to 911 conspiracy theories, do keep on subscribing to the officially claimed but never proven (and much exposed hole-ridden) theory of ill-equipped fugitives in caves in Afghanistan managing to orchestrate the most technically intricate multiple airborn attack in the most secure airspace in the Western hemisphere.
That beats all conspiracy "theories"!
FYI Toad, there is significant difference between exposing the clear conflict of national interest in Washington exercised by hardcore Zionists who seek to use American might and economic strength to perpetuate the apartheid policies of Israel and subscribing to neo-nazi notions of ZOG.
I stick to what is emprically verifiable on a political level and you will find nothing in my references to key administration ideologues that suggests anything more than that fact.