If you need urgent support, call 999 or go to your nearest A&E. To contact our Crisis Messenger (open 24/7) text THEMIX to 85258.
Read the community guidelines before posting ✨
Options
Take a look around and enjoy reading the discussions. If you'd like to join in, it's really easy to register and then you'll be able to post. If you'd like to learn what this place is all about, head here.
Comments
Its investing, because he's buying a share of the business and getting a share of the profits in return, wasnt the whole argument that investing was always bad because its making money from money.
Youd critersise it if you thought you could though wouldnt you.
Sorry I was talking about the real world not some fantasy la la land where your economic theories make sence.
It feels good to play Blagsta at his own game short remarks with no substance, yes I could get used to this
http://www.ssc.wisc.edu/~wright/Foundations.pdf
What would be the point? As I said - criticising individual cases like that is absurd.
Or even a land where you can spell? Look - these theories are based on real life - have a look at that link I posted, also see this
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Surplus-value
Oh the irony. I've never seen you post anything of substance.
Its not exploiting someone, if they want to do it.......
Do you really object so much to having to go and work for someone? Is it really that bad?
Do you personally fell exploited?
Why not start your own business then?
Im suprised no ones made that spelling crack before Id have expected to get it all the time, I dont though only from you
My first post in this topic was definatly of substance, at least I explained my reasoning rather then just spout cheep slogans and insults
1987 20.38
1988 19.67
1989 19.42
1990 19.78
1991 20.71
1992 21.15
1993 20.48
1994 20.00
1995 19.61
1996 19.15
1997 18.27
1998 17.91
1999 18.40
2000 18.69
2001 19.23
2002 20.14
2003 21.08
2004 ..
I also find your posts deelpy hypocritical as you have completely ignored any of my points or examples. Well done you pompous prick.
Well done, did you just make them up? or have you got a source?
Well if he is missing the point it is because you are not expliaing your ideas very well..........
I do apologise.
World Bank development Indicators...........
I am sure that you makes you feel a lot better..........
Don't nick my insults!
You haven't been reading a word I've written or looked at any of those links have you?
Thats not a proper source reference. Provide one please.
:yeees:
standard get out clause, well done...........
I notice you didn't answer.
I dont think its helpfull to call me that
The only example with out going through each post youve given which comes close to an explanation is your "co-operative" instead of state owned communism which leaves a lot of questions, unfortunatly its friday and Im at work cant spend as much time as Id like to expalining why your wrong and im right
I gave a detailed explanation on my first post then on why profit is legitimate and on why investing is legitimate, a lot more words than youve givern as an explanation
Well you clearly haven't.
Claiming I haven't read anything is Blagstas standard way of avoiding the fact that he hasn't explained himself at all, and has said very little of substance.........
No, it was always valueless, just as the pound is. Problem was someone noticed, a panic started and it's true value was revealed, bankrupting everyone in the space of days.
How do they do this again?
Of course it is. To take an example. I take out a £6000 loan, and idiots take paper and ink off me in exchange for real goods (thick bastards). I then refuse to pay the bank back. What has the bank factually lost?
Paper and ink. Heres a voucher for staples, get the fuck away from me.
It gets even more comical if I have paid by check, because I have sold my signature for whatever "price" the goods was. To take matters to an even more ridiculous extreme, the bank has typed into a computer that I have £6000 and this figure is transfered to other banks to "settle debts". I don't pay them back. What is the bank short of factually?
£6000 typed on a computer screen.
Just like that one. The whole thing is ridiculous and can collapse at any moment. Just takes 9% of people to ask for their money in "cash"all on the same day and the system will fail.
For some reason you think it;s a good thing that the whole world you live in can drop out of the sky at any moment. I don't. Go figure.
Funny thats exactly what I tried to tell those so called "policemen" but they wouldnt listed, kept on saying I had "commited a theft" and had to go to court bastards eh.
Typical of people not listening to reason isnt it ?
I can imagine him going to the supermakret with a van full of stuff to try and barter for some food...............
What had I stolen, factually?
Paper and ink. Which I am happy to supply the cost of replacing. (Currently about the worth of the copper in the penny to every 3 £50 notes printed.)
Hell, in the case of a credit card, they actually create the money from nothing for you. Once you spend it, the books are balanced and they don't even have a loss at all.
That's accountancy, that is.
The one you don't visit you mean? Better that you could possibly imagine.
Hey, if you are going to be dim enough to accept paper I am going to be dim enough to give it to you. I only accept it myself so I can turn it as quickly as possible into shit that's actually got value.
It might be an idea to let us know how I can verify it, i.e. a link. Anyway, what does it prove? Can you name me any industries that have been nationalised since the 80's? How about industries that have been privatised? How about PFI's and PPP's?
Sorry, I can't relly make head nor tail of that. You ever heard of punctuation?