If you need urgent support, call 999 or go to your nearest A&E. To contact our Crisis Messenger (open 24/7) text THEMIX to 85258.
Read the community guidelines before posting ✨
Options
Essential support for under 25s
Essential support for under 25s
Take a look around and enjoy reading the discussions. If you'd like to join in, it's really easy to register and then you'll be able to post. If you'd like to learn what this place is all about, head here.
Comments
The point is that most mental health professionals don't know anything about drugs. That's why I said there needs to be more dual diagnosis workers.
But people are using drugs anyway. Hundreds of thousands of people. Maybe we should make it safer for them?
You don't know much at all about drugs.
Not necessarily.
buy this
Precis?
I give up.
As I said - come and talk when you've actually worked in the field.
Look it up you lazy fucker.
If you're not going to support your argument with anything other than your own experience and values then you can hardly claim superiority of knowledge.
I will look it up but you might have wanted to tell me what it had to say. Apparently not.
I'm not asking you to do any work, just support your arguments with something a bit more substantial than one line comments about the futility of mine. Is that too much to ask in a Politics & Debate forum.
Blimey. Anyone would have thought I'd asked you to bring a copy to my desk and read it to me. :rolleyes:
*goes forth to multiply*
lmao , brilliant
I reckon someone got out of bed the wrong side this morning
it was illegal for farmers NOT to grow it in america if you read the book. that was until the 1930's when the petro chemical industry discovered they could make long plastic fibres ...polluting environmentaly unfriendly fibres that could make loads of money the world over by replacing hemp rope canvas sails ...(canvas means cannabis by the way) ...and a host of other products that the hemp plant previously supplied. it was banned for commercial reasons ...so the oil men could make lots of dirty money ...you realy haven't read this thread have you.
download the book. it's free.
I wouldn't be suprised Kentish, you won't get anywhere either I wouldn't imagine.........
I like that one, ask others to take on your word/experience what you would refuse to accept from others i.e. me in the pathetic argument recently about the interrelatedness of politics/economics..........
In the hands of criminals and terrorists.
Here we have addiction being treated as a crime rather than an illness, where ecstasy is in the same class as crack. Where otherwise law abiding, hardworking, tax paying individualsare being turned into criminals for smoking a little weed.
The laws are out of date and blatently don't do any good whatsoever. It's time to accept that people will always do drugs because they're fun, and most people couldn't give a fuck if they're illegal or not. Time for a new approach.
The first statement is true but you could say it about anyother crime and it would be just as true, the implication is that smoking weed should not be criminal, but the association of the weed smoker with being a good person is rather flawed
Otherwise law abiding, hardworking, tax paying individuals are being made criminals for shhoting up a little heroine
or driving a few miles over the limit
or having a few drinks for the road
etc etc
As for the second point, I am not convinced that is true at all, hence the popularity of threads debating drugs!
Not really. Kentish has been pointed in the right direction to find out the info. The rest is up to him. I haven't got the time to write a bleedin' book.
The point is that I can and do argue my position. You can't.
Can you see the difference between points 1 and points 2 & 3?
What like that 'Go and read soem Marx' argument, that was a good one I thought.......:rolleyes:
rearrange this
advocate devils