Home Politics & Debate
If you need urgent support, call 999 or go to your nearest A&E. To contact our Crisis Messenger (open 24/7) text THEMIX to 85258.
Read the community guidelines before posting ✨
Options

Pro-Life vs Pro-Choice

1356

Comments

  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    girls who have abortions shouldnt be having sex anyway if theyre not prepared to have a baby they shouldnt be doing it
    That's the most pathetic thing to say. Is every bloke, girl or anyone who goes out and has sex prepared to have a baby? If sex was just for the purpose of having babies then it wouldn't be enjoyable. Ok, so no contraception is 100% but what you say is ridiculous.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Originally posted by KrazedKT:
    <STRONG>
    If sex was just for the purpose of having babies then it wouldn't be enjoyable</STRONG>

    but thats why it is enjoyable, to make people do it and have babies!

    and girls should know how reliable the contraception is and then decide if there prepared to take the risk of getting pregnant. there isnt any excuse for getting pregnant and not having the baby.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    there isnt any excuse for getting pregnant and not having the baby.

    on the good ol' jerry springer show he once said that if you are not ready for a baby, then you arent ready for sex
    i disagree with that because my 29 year old, married friend wasnt sure that she wanted the baby even up to when she was in the delivery room pushing!!!
    sex is not just there for procreation and you seem to mention only girls when it comes to responsibility over contraception, dont forget that it takes 2 to make a baby
    in an ideal world abortion would not exist however our world is far from perfect however, if abortion was unacceptable to you all the time, would it still be unacceptable if it was means to save the womans life?
    your view is very black and white - moral issues are somewhat grey
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Originally posted by beer monster:
    <STRONG>hello <IMG alt="image" SRC="smile.gif" border="0">

    i dont think that there is any excuse for an abortion ever, and euthanasia is murder too cos god will let them die when it's there time. girls who have abortions shouldnt be having sex anyway if theyre not prepared to have a baby they shouldnt be doing it even if they do use contraception and it goes wrong, most of them just cant be bothered with it so if they feel bad it serves them right.

    thats what i think anyway <IMG alt="image" SRC="smile.gif" border="0"></STRONG>

    you're entitled to your opinion but just remember - for some of us there is no such thing as God and so therefore this argument is based on an irrelevance for many of us.

    Most 'Girls' don't have sex with abortion in mind. Contraception does fail, what are you suggesting - get rid of all contraception and return to the days when women had 15 children in 15 years ? I recon your post is ust an attempt to wind us up. What about the boys who want to have sex all the time?
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Originally posted by beer monster:
    <STRONG>and girls should know how reliable the contraception is and then decide if there prepared to take the risk of getting pregnant. there isnt any excuse for getting pregnant and not having the baby.</STRONG>

    Whatever dipshit. Dunno if you know this, but men get girls pregnant, you know, not just girls themselves. Why should girls have to suffer having a baby they dont want alone- a hell of a lot of blokes wouldnt stop around to be a father, but, of course, thats ok because theyre men.

    Hate to break this to you but girls dont decide to have abortions because its a good way of passing some leisure time, you know.

    Random point: In the words of Billy Connolly, "Only a celibate could seriously come up with the withdrawal method as a good form of contraception." Sadly most moralists and religious bigots seem to still have the attitude that girls are second-class citizens, and dont deserve to have the choice over their own bodies. You can be sure as hell that if men got pregnant, abortion would be the greatest invention of all time among the religious moralists and bigots of this world.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Originally posted by beer monster:
    <STRONG>

    but thats why it is enjoyable, to make people do it and have babies!

    and girls should know how reliable the contraception is and then decide if there prepared to take the risk of getting pregnant. there isnt any excuse for getting pregnant and not having the baby.</STRONG>

    Oh please...You are now insulting me
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Originally posted by byny:
    <STRONG>

    Contraception does fail, what are you suggesting - get rid of all contraception and return to the days when women had 15 children in 15 years ? I recon your post is ust an attempt to wind us up. What about the boys who want to have sex all the time?</STRONG>

    no i tbink that people shouldnt have sex unless there prepared to suffer the possible consiquences. contraception isnt 100% failsafe and people should realise that before they use it and decide if they are willing to take the 2-3% chance that they could become parents as a result.

    i realise that it takes 2 to make a baby but its the girl who suffers the consiquences so it should be the girl who makes the desision so if she does get pregnant then the responsibility is hers.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Well I'm glad to hear that you are such a paragon of virtue and that you will never have sex unless you want a baby. The rest of us admit to being human beings.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    thats why sex before marriage is wrong. it just leads to alot of heartache and problems.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    I can understand where you are coming from but it's not going to happen. Lots of people do not even believe in marriage but it's not like they will never have sex. Lots of marriages break up, that causes heartbreak too. Young people are going to have sex, it's a fact of life and you can't stop it.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Originally posted by beer monster:
    <STRONG>thats why sex before marriage is wrong. it just leads to alot of heartache and problems.</STRONG>

    WHAT? But surely so can sex after marriage then? What difference does marriage make to a trusting longterm or a shorterm relationship?
    I've been with the same boyfriend for 7 years and he's the ONLY person I have had sex with and probably the only person I ever will have sex with. we are as committed as we can be and I don't believe marriage will contribute anything to what we have in our relationship. It won't make it better it won't make it worse. I don't WANT to get married - I do want to have a sexual relationship with my partner. You may think it's wrong for youo but don't be blind to other peoples needs and wants Idiot!

    I've been having "sex before marriage" for 5 years and it hasn't led to heartbreak and problems. Qualify your statement, where's your evidence, your facts? If you got out into the world a bit more and stopped judging people on their lack of religious belief perhaps your statements would be more correct.

    I could sleep with 100 people and never have any heartache or sleep with one man after marriage and suffer complete and total hearbreak. It makes no difference if you're married, there's more to it than that. Bill Clinton was Married but he still had extra marrital sex which must have been upsetting for Hilary, where's your facts.

    God you really make me angry!

    if you don't want to have sex then don't but let the rest of us make up our minds for ourselves. don't judge people so much!

    [ 16-01-2002: Message edited by: byny ]
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Originally posted by beer monster:
    <STRONG>thats why sex before marriage is wrong. it just leads to alot of heartache and problems.</STRONG>

    Go back to Catholic College and learn how to touch up small boys, you sad person. Find out about this place from the Daily Mail did you?

    You have your own morals, and I respect that, but people who think you are a shithead are not evil who 'deserve to suffer the consequences'. And as I said, if men like you got pregnant, women wouldnt be so put down if they chose termination. At least youve grown up enougfh to realise that all the evils in the world arent the fault of women.

    Go back to Lords you bigot. I bet you still call black people n*ggers too.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Maybe I am being simplistic, but I think that the cut-off point between foetus and baby is just before 6 months- 2/3 of the whole pregnancy time. If the mother has not decided by then,then she will have to live with her indecision.In response to beer monster's point that it is wrong to have an abortion, do you know what the feeling of not being wanted could do to the child if she decides to keep it. She may be too young, but that doesn't matter to you, according to you she should spend the next 19 years of her life paying for that mistake over and over again. If she's not ready for a baby then she shouldn't be forced to have one by the people around her. It should, I repeat
    Be Her Choice as she is going to have to carry the foetus around inside of her for the next 9 months.Also, she will have to make lots of sacrifices if she keeps it.

    [ 16-01-2002: Message edited by: Agrofrog ]
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    .
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Originally posted by Agrofrog:
    <STRONG>Maybe I am being simplistic, but I think that the cut-off point between foetus and baby is just before 6 months- 2/3 of the whole pregnancy time.</STRONG>
    I've said this before, but foetus and baby are just words. I think if you have a problem with abortion then that is your decision, but trying to qualify your choice by quoting times at which a foetus is suddenly a baby is pathetic.

    If you don't think it's right to kill a 'baby', then why a 'foetus', which according to your calculations would automatically become a baby at 6 months? It may not look much like a baby before 6 months but the cells are living.

    I don't have a problem if someone wants an abortion. That's fine and it's their choice. But abortion should never be seen as a form of contraception, and therefore the point in time when a foetus becomes a baby should not need to be cited as reason why termination is acceptable.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Exactly! Abortion is NOT a contraceptive and Women should be using contraception when having sex unless they want to conceive. However - if there is a contraceptive disaster then Abortion should be there as an option.

    To get an abortion you have to have the consent of 2 doctors, you are sent for counselling and you have to make up your mind before a number of weeks. It's not something girls skip along to do in the afternoons for a bit of fun but a serious life decision and most women would prefer not to be in that situation.
    I don't believe in saving yourself for marriage and I think beer monster is basing his argument on a religious belief of his own. He obviously has a certain kind of morals but likes to think that anyone who doesn't share those 'morals' is immoral!

    True also that we shouldn't be basing our arguments on 'when's a cell a baby' either you agree with abortion or you don't - it's not a matter of weeks or months or cells or life. but a matter of choice (Not demand!)
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Originally posted by the girl with sharp teeth:
    <STRONG>
    what if the girl's pregnant through rape? </STRONG>

    i thin about 70% of women who are "raped" know there rapists so are they really being raped or do they just say they are afterwards. i dont know but if someone really has been raped and is pregnant she can always give the baby up for adoption, i can see that she might not want much to do with it wonce its born.

    Edited because of INAPPROPRIATE content <IMG alt="image" SRC="mad.gif" border="0">

    [ 24-01-2002: Message edited by: Squinty ]
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Originally posted by beer monster:
    <STRONG>

    it says in the bible that a woman whoes raped in a town or city should be stoned to death cos if she was really being raped she would haave made enugh noise that someone would hear and help her, and i thin about 70% of women who are "raped" know there rapists so are they really being raped or do they just say they are afterwards. i dont know but if someone really has been raped and is pregnant she can always give the baby up for adoption, i can see that she might not want much to do with it wonce its born.</STRONG>

    You sick, sick bastard. When you have to deal with someone you love dearly having been raped THEN start spouting your shit out. have you any idea how many users of these boards have been raped, I can think of at least three.

    Of course, you have to use this justification, cos the only way youll ever get laid is if you do grab some girl (or, in your case, pre-pubescent boy) of the street.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Originally posted by beer monster:
    <STRONG>it says in the bible that a woman whoes raped in a town or city should be stoned to death cos if she was really being raped she would haave made enugh noise that someone would hear and help her, and i thin about 70% of women who are "raped" know there rapists so are they really being raped or do they just say they are afterwards. i dont know but if someone really has been raped and is pregnant she can always give the baby up for adoption, i can see that she might not want much to do with it wonce its born.</STRONG>
    OK now you've gone too far. People aren't really raped you say? They just don't shout loud enough to summon help?

    Wake up to the real world. Not everyone has such a warped view of the Bible and most people are compassionate enough to feel sympathetic for rape victims rather than stone them because of their apparent lack of resistance to rape.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    jeez guys.....Stop rising to his bait. Its quite obvious hes a troll that has arrived after reading the mail article. He is simply writing the most offensive stuff he can.

    Dont feed the troll

    Ignore him.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    .
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Originally posted by beer monster:
    <STRONG>

    it says in the bible that a woman whoes raped in a town or city should be stoned to death cos if she was really being raped she would haave made enugh noise that someone would hear and help her, and i thin about 70% of women who are "raped" know there rapists so are they really being raped or do they just say they are afterwards. i dont know but if someone really has been raped and is pregnant she can always give the baby up for adoption, i can see that she might not want much to do with it wonce its born.</STRONG>

    the Bible? Can you give me some reasons that fall into my realm of understanding..I don't believe in God you see, and I don't live my life according to the rules of a story book.
    If you want to convince a christian then use the bible.. I'm not one, will never be so I need a more convincing argument.
    OH and can you do something about your grammar? It's their not there. Perhaps you should sort out your literacy before you try and run the world according to something called the Bible.
    I know you are here to wind us up but at least have a convincing argument!
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Originally posted by the girl with sharp teeth:
    <STRONG>i'm sorry david <IMG alt="image" SRC="frown.gif" border="0"> but i was angry</STRONG>

    Sorry for what? Dont worry <IMG alt="image" SRC="smile.gif" border="0">
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Originally posted by Kermit:
    <STRONG>

    Sorry for what? Dont worry <IMG alt="image" SRC="smile.gif" border="0"></STRONG>

    I've kept out of this because I don't see the point in trying to change someone's view on abortion.
    But Beermonster, your views have taught me something. If there really is a God like the one you go on about, bring on hell!
    You are a sick, twisted individual to even think that women are in control while being raped. You are an individual who has no idea about the complexities of this world. You are to put it bluntly, a sad, sorry little individual.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    .
  • Options
    Girl-From-MarsGirl-From-Mars Posts: 2,822 Boards Guru
    ugh. beer monster makes me sick.

    ellie - *hugemassivehugs*

    byny - i agree with everything you've said, and you've said it a lot better than i could have, so i won't bore anyone with my opinions <IMG alt="image" SRC="smile.gif" border="0"> if you want to know, substitute my name for byny's and you'll be away <IMG alt="image" SRC="smile.gif" border="0"> only i'm not in a 7 year relationship, nor planning any children in the near future. meh, minor details.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Sorry this took so long, didn't see it
    Originally posted by Whowhere:
    <STRONG>


    haha,lemme guess, an American with superior morals, hmmm Pro-life?
    You sound as well informed as Mr Bush himself. Maybe the child's life is still as sacred. But in the eyes of the rape victim, it often isn't. It can be seen as a reminder of the brutal event, and chances are will grow up unloved/despised by the parent.
    Besides, you are hardly one to talk, being in the military means you are in the ultimate posistion for robbing people of life, without a choice. How do you justify that?</STRONG>

    Well at least here in the states there is a lack of babys going up for adoption so the child could actually have a loveing home.

    Hadicapped huh? Isn't the smartest man alive today only able to use a finger and his eyes?

    I do not murder. As a country founded under God I am a protector of it and it's interests. If I kill it is like the Israelites killing the palastinians, it's under the torch of Justice from God.

    Taliban = Oppressing the population (especially the women) and starving them, while holding public excutions.

    Balkans = Crazy Psycho killing off a ethnic group

    Somolia = Gangs runing the streets, rapeing and pillaging the land

    Desert Storm = Another Crazy, commiting genocide and also threatening our oil supply (see I even admitted it, OK).

    Besides, my only involvement in war is preparing the Jamming equipment so that every aircraft we have can deliver it's strike packages without being shot down. <IMG alt="image" SRC="biggrin.gif" border="0">
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    I had an abortion was I was 18 years old. At the time I was living in a multi storey flat with my 19 year old boyfriend.

    We were both working full time and I was on the pill. I got pregnant. Never in a million years did I think it would happen to me, but it did.

    I was 6 weeks gone when I found out. I agonised for 3 weeks over what I should do.
    I knew in my heart that a termination was the best option. We had very little money, inadequate living arrangments and I didn't want to bring a child up the way that I was brought up, no money, no proper home etc..

    Whoever tells you that making the decision to kill your own flesh and blood is easy, has no idea what they are talking about.

    It was the hardest thing I have ever had to do, and something which will stay very clear in my mind until the day I die.

    I am 21 now, nearly 22. Still with the same boyfriend, we are both still working and are hopefully going to buy a house this year.

    We think about what would have been, every single day. Not a day goes by where I don't think maybe I picked the wrong choice, maybe I was selfish etc..but in the end I had to make the choice I did and I have to live with it.

    To all the Pro lifers out there, I'm sorry but you don't know sh*t and you shouldn't judge people like myself because you have no idea what it's like.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Hello Fattee!
    Welcome
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    .
Sign In or Register to comment.