Home Politics & Debate
If you need urgent support, call 999 or go to your nearest A&E. To contact our Crisis Messenger (open 24/7) text THEMIX to 85258.
Read the community guidelines before posting ✨
Options

The super-rich who don't pay any tax

135

Comments

  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    I don't believe I should pay my taxes so over-privileged anti-social fools like you have an education, health service, library service, police service, fire service etc.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Territt wrote: »
    i dont beleave i should work my ass off to pay for people to sit at home poping out kids, living on other peoples money

    :rolleyes:
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Aladdin wrote: »
    You're missing the point. The tax they are required to pay is 40% on earnings above certain thresold (currently around 28k I believe).

    That is what they are required to pay. The live in the UK, they work in the UK and they conduct their business in the UK. So 40%. Couldn't be simpler.

    The 40% bracket starts at £32K ish this year. I doubt many of them declare their capital gains (which should be taxed at 40% after allowances as well). Thats the point, if you live, work and conduct your business in one main country, thats where you should pay tax, not pay bugger all in a tax haven.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Blagsta wrote: »
    I don't believe I should pay my taxes so over-privileged anti-social fools like you have an education, health service, library service, police service, fire service etc.


    Blagsta you really should make a personal attacks at me when you know nothing about me, should you?

    And i think your find my mother paid for my education and health care.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Territt wrote: »
    Blagsta you really should make a personal attacks at me when you know nothing about me, should you?

    And i think your find my mother paid for my education and health care.

    So youve never used a state funded institution at any point in your life ever?
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Territt wrote: »
    Blagsta you really should make a personal attacks at me when you know nothing about me, should you?

    And i think your find my mother paid for my education and health care.

    I know enough to know that I wouldn't piss on you if you were on fire.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Renzo wrote: »
    So youve never used a state funded institution at any point in your life ever?

    im not saying that at all, i just dont think its fair that people that work hard should have to pay for people that choose not to work

    i think the fairest way to deal with things is to just charge a set amount to everybody, that way no one is paying more then the person next to them
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Territt wrote: »
    Aladdin,

    you really hate being poor dont you?
    I'm not poor Territt... :rolleyes:

    You're quite clueless aren't you?
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Territt wrote: »
    i dont beleave i should work my ass off to pay for people to sit at home poping out kids, living on other peoples money
    Dear dear... :rolleyes:

    And yet you believe it is right for mega rich people to exploit you (supposing you're not self-employed) and not even contribute towards your wellbeing and that of all of the workers who make their wealth possible.

    You truly are the definition of a turkey voting for xmas aren't you?
  • Options
    Teh_GerbilTeh_Gerbil Posts: 13,332 Born on Earth, Raised by The Mix
    Aladdin wrote: »
    I'm not poor Territt... :rolleyes:

    You're quite clueless aren't you?

    MIDDLE CLASS SOCIALIST!!!!!111one You're almost like Lenin.

    Alladin, the Capitalist system has some people so indocrinated by playing up on thier own freed and hatred they'll never leave its grip.

    We get brought up at school being told greed is wrong, to share and love, same if you are a religious child and read your holy book (unless you are a scientologist, then I really pity you) and then thrust into a world ... of greed and corruption, playing up societys weakest and most despicable points.

    Is it any wonder society is in such a shape in a culture where we teach greed is good, hate thy neighbour and rob him of every penny he has. Is that a world that is good to live in? Of course not.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Territt wrote: »
    im not saying that at all

    So, let me get this right.

    When you use the welfare/education system etc. then it's okay, but when someone else does it's wrong?
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Teh_Gerbil wrote: »
    Is it any wonder society is in such a shape in a culture where we teach greed is good, hate thy neighbour and rob him of every penny he has. Is that a world that is good to live in? Of course not.
    That is the main legacy of Thatcher innit.

    A legacy that some (including our very own Stargalaxy) actually salute.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Blagsta wrote: »
    I think it's probably more accurate to say that you hate poor people.

    POTW
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Territt wrote: »
    im not saying that at all, i just dont think its fair that people that work hard should have to pay for people that choose not to work

    There are some people who can't work, should we not give them any benefits and not let them use any of the stuff that taxpayers pay for?
    i think the fairest way to deal with things is to just charge a set amount to everybody, that way no one is paying more then the person next to them

    How would that be fair? That would mean some people who don't earn alot of money (like my parents) would have hardly any money to live on. Tell me, how would that be fair?:rolleyes:
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    I'd argue that the rich people are the ones who invest more into the economy, who drive the big engines behind it to use a bit of a metaphor, they're crucial to our economy and I'm thankful for them.

    Unfortunately it boils down to the simple truth (whichever way you look at it) that extremely rich people are more important that joe bloggs earning £6.35 an hour in a call centre. That's why there isn't a massive clampdown on them evading tax.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    ShyBoy wrote: »
    I'd argue that the rich people are the ones who invest more into the economy, who drive the big engines behind it to use a bit of a metaphor, they're crucial to our economy and I'm thankful for them.

    Unfortunately it boils down to the simple truth (whichever way you look at it) that extremely rich people are more important that joe bloggs earning £6.35 an hour in a call centre. That's why there isn't a massive clampdown on them evading tax.

    :yes:

    High taxes scare off the entreprenaurs in a country. We need to do all we can to encurage entreprenaurs in this country, I would hate to think if I work hard and build a sucsessful business about half my earning were going to in tax.

    I would just live in some tax heaven and commute to and from the uk when necessary.

    :thumb:
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    we need a fairer taxation system

    i believe the marginal tax rate for someone earning £10,000/year is about 60% simply due to living costs taxes like VAT and duty.


    people who earn 7, 8 figure salaries should be expected to pay a fair % of their earning as tax, not 10% at least 30%

    i recently got a tax hike on my meagre wage just to pay for wealthier peoples tax cuts - fair i bid you not
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    http://www.direct.gov.uk/en/MoneyTaxAndBenefits/Taxes/BeginnersGuideToTax/DG_4015566

    Income tax on earned income above £34,601 is 40%.

    That would apply to CEOs of big organisations as well. I think the guy who owns harrods is right at the top of directors salaries at around £300k pa.

    The mega rich people who make lots of money who are often seen as those who are money grabbing scrooges. But in reality they're speculators who put their own personal fortunes into the economy in the form of new businesses etc. which in turn they make a nice profit on (if they work out, a lot of them also lose a lot of money). This profit is split, some of it goes to expanding the business further, some of it goes to employees in profit share initiatives, some of it goes to the government and in taxation, and some of it goes back to the investor in the form of a return.

    These investors work very long weeks as it never stops. Without them the economy would stagnate. They're already taxed on almost everything, even profit / income is taxed, but some people think they should be taxed further, until there is no real incentive.

    At the moment, with the economy suffering from inflation and interest rates rising there is no way in hell we want to start putting off the people who are still encouraging growth in the economy.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    I have to say I never cease to be amazed by the willingness of some people to play the part of turkeys voting for xmas :confused:
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    The problem is, Aladdin, is that the Government tried "taxing the rich till the pips squeak" in the 1970s, and they all fucked off offshore. This meant that the working class people were left to foot the taxbill, meaning that most people were taxed at 50% even on fairly low incomes. I know that my dad, who is a skilled worker with no academic qualifications, worked overtime and brought home about 15% of what he earned because of all the tax. So he didn't bother, meaning the tax income from him was lower.

    When the higher rate of income tax was cut by Lawson to 40%, the rich actually paid more. The rich will pay tax if it is a fair tax, but taxing them until the pips squeak is not fair, and of course they will evade it. 40% of £100,000 is a damn sight better than 80% of £0.

    Raising the tax rate to 50% for earnings over £100,000 would be fair, but why on earth would someone go to work just so the Government could take 80% or 90% of everything they earn? They'd either not bother, or move to a country where they can reap the fruits of their labour.

    That said, the abolition of the 10% tax rate is the worst thing that could have happened to low-income families- I'm sure that they will all still vote for Gordon at the next election though :lol:
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Aladdin wrote: »
    I have to say I never cease to be amazed by the willingness of some people to play the part of turkeys voting for xmas :confused:

    You need to look at the bigger picture though. Yea, we could have complete socialism at one extreme where no matter how much money you earn you end up with the same amount. Sounds fair enough. But thats too simplistic.

    The economuic renumeration you receive after tax should be proportional to your value to society. It's a sad fact that a business owner that employs 500 people and will provide not only goods and services to the economy but also support the livelihoods of those 500 people is probably more important to society on balance than one doctor. Which is why he probably earns more.

    It just seems to me there is a big class war still raging in the UK between the haves and the have nots. I say have nots, we have an economy where the minimum wage is very high, where employment rights are brilliant and have a staggered tax rate for those who earn less.

    Of course, the wealthy who evade tax by lying on their tax forms should be punished, but with the amount of auditing going on that's relatively rare - and when it happens the consequences as with enron in the US are severe. But the idea that we should impose even more taxes on the rich to subsidise everyone else I think is flawed. We're already subsidised in many ways and whenever this discussion comes around I can't help feeling there is some class animosity in it.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Aladdin wrote: »
    I have to say I never cease to be amazed by the willingness of some people to play the part of turkeys voting for xmas :confused:

    Who's the Turkey? Those wanting to expand the cake so we all getting bigger slices or those wanting a bigger share of a smaller cake?

    I'd say it was the latter...
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    I say the turkeys are those who are defending the rights of superrich people to fuck everyone up the arse- inclusing themselves.

    Unless of course those people defending the actions of those who avoid paying tax are mega-rich themselves of course. But somehow I doubt that is the case.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Aladdin wrote: »
    I say the turkeys are those who are defending the rights of superrich people to fuck everyone up the arse- inclusing themselves.

    Unless of course those people defending the actions of those who avoid paying tax are mega-rich themselves of course. But somehow I doubt that is the case.

    I wouldn't. I'd say the turkeys are those who want short term gain, even though that's going to lead to long term loss.

    How is the view from the coop at this time of year anyway?
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Aladdin wrote: »
    I say the turkeys are those who are defending the rights of superrich people to fuck everyone up the arse- inclusing themselves.

    Unless of course those people defending the actions of those who avoid paying tax are mega-rich themselves of course. But somehow I doubt that is the case.

    So you would rather have all these people bugger off and take their business elsewhere just so things can be "fair", that's just cutting off your own nose to spite your face.
  • Options
    Teh_GerbilTeh_Gerbil Posts: 13,332 Born on Earth, Raised by The Mix
    I am also supprised by the reactions in this thread.

    Just goes to show the Mass Media has had its desired affect - selling Capitalism to those who it rips off and doesn't benefit at all. The new Opiate of the Masses is here it seems.

    Ignorance is the new black.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    I wouldn't. I'd say the turkeys are those who want short term gain, even though that's going to lead to long term loss.

    How is the view from the coop at this time of year anyway?
    If you call their bluff I'll tell you how many will actually take their business elsewhere: bugger all.

    If you were to say 'let's tax people 60, 80% tax' I can see some leaving. But simply closing the loopholes so they can't exploit it and have to pay what everyone else- including many megarich people who actually have an ounce of decency in them incidentally- is not going to provoke an exodus. At all.

    It seems that it only takes some vague threats or predictions of doom by businessmen (the minimum wage will bring mass unemployment; we must be allowed to sell weapons to lunatics or we'll go bankrupt; don't make us comply with the law or we'll leave) for people to dance to their tune and believe everything they're told.

    How exactly would, say, Rupert Murdoch take his business elsewhere if the government summed up the balls to make him pay the tax he should? Do you think he'll close down News International and BSkyB and let all his channels and newspapers sink? Yeah right.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    So you would rather have all these people bugger off and take their business elsewhere just so things can be "fair", that's just cutting off your own nose to spite your face.
    They wouldn't.

    Christ. Since when we willingly accept blackmail and extortion?
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Aladdin, how do you explain the 1970s then, when all the rich people DID move offshore?

    And how do you explain the 1980s, when a cut in tax rates actually yielded more money from the top 10% of earners?

    I'd rather have 10% of £100k than 70% of nothing, and whilst its not ideal, those who can afford to offshore will do so. If I could get away with halving my tax bill I would do so, and anyone who says otherwise is a liar.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Well if they were taxing up to 98% tax I can see people leaving, as I said earlier.

    But 40% is not excessive. And furthermore, many multimillionaire businessmen already pay it without threats and without detriment to their immense wealth.

    I think I'm moving into extortion. I can't believe how easily some people will bend over backwards... Sorted for life, I'll be.
Sign In or Register to comment.