If you need urgent support, call 999 or go to your nearest A&E. To contact our Crisis Messenger (open 24/7) text THEMIX to 85258.
Options
Take a look around and enjoy reading the discussions. If you'd like to join in, it's really easy to register and then you'll be able to post. If you'd like to learn what this place is all about, head here.
Comments
Oh, you think I view all women due to a previous relationship?
Sorry mate, you'll have to try harder than that.
So, having a magazine at the checkout of Sainsburys with women presented on the cover as sexual objects purely to satisfy male sexual desire is a sign of a healthy society is it? You're fucked in the head mate.
You appear to be bitter about something to do with women.
And how did "girl power" culture come about?
I think they both came about because of antagonism towards each other but it is not some malice way of thinking or anyone who conforms to lad culture is some evil cunt. Bit like "chavs", all talk no action.
Well if that offends you so much, ask Sainsburys to move the magazines then....!
"Purely to satisfy male sexual desire"?? Tell you what mate, YOU'RE the one who's serious fucked in the head. You need counselling to sort out these nasty issues you have with the evils in this nasty world which can so easily be attributed to these publications which order brainless men to view women as objects to beat and rape.
Common sense 2, Blagsta nil as usual.
I don't know what you mean by "girl power", except for the Spice Girls.
Where did I call anyone an "evil cunt"?
Eh?
What on earth are you on about? Talk about a straw man argument.
Twat.
Ok so all girls are angels who never bad mouth men of or perv over fit mens bodies either, and hasn't been also prevelent in the 90's to the current day. :rolleyes:
You didn't but you're implying there's something wrong with men who buy these magazines and talk like a "lad" as if they're just dumb yobs. Sorry just my impression, clarify if you need to.
What are you on about now? Why are you attributing views to me that I haven't stated? Are you a mate of My Sacrifice?
No, I haven't said anything of the sort. Quote me.
Possibly because you're pretty efficient at it yourself? For example.....
I might have a cataract in one eye but I'm sure I can't see anything where I say anything about a 'healthy society'.
To be perfectly honest, I haven't got a clue what we're arguing about anymore. Can you go back to the last part of the thread that made sense and debate from there.
ETA:Why the fuck would I be a mate with him for?
This makes no sense.
a lot of it coming from the pc trendy attitudes of the moment.
every society has had porn.
there have always been drawings of naked women with exagerated bits.
the nineties laddish culture is mostly in your imaginations ...put there of course by the media to make something ancient look like something modern.
people don't half get hung up about none issuse.
i.m glad most of you will never be law makers/rule makers.
I'm not really surprised.
What an utter cock.
/unsubscribing.
I think a definition of what I mean by "objectification" might be in order
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexual_objectification
I dunno, he's a weirdo Jesus freak. I was being sarcy anyway.
Oh yes I see now.
Yes these magazines may objectify women sexually but my point is that it won't manifest itself into anything nastier so isn't that much of a problem.
What it does do however, is feed into a general cultural view of human beings (especially women, but men too) as objects and not subjects. That ain't healthy IMO.
always looking for bogeymen.
pissed again are you?
Porn though would probably always exist - which is a shame, as woman are more that a pair of tits and a cunt as Blagsta said.
if ...his communal way of living were ever to come about ...it is so clear that people like him would be following the latest trends in political thinking.
trends usualy die.
blag would have to travel a little to find a communal town that wished to live by his ideals.
or ...manipulate and legislate ...
freedom out the window.
Or have I missed it again?
We've said that men aren't getting what they really want and so have to go for faux porn for their thrills. Must be missing out on something. At the same time we are saying that women aren't totally thrilled with modern life neither. Hmmmmm.
Why do men mention women's looks, have a feel etc?
Because, sometimes, it works.
Go out and ask every woman you meet for a fuck and after not too long you'll get one. Simple. Man fancies shag. It's weekend. He's drunk. He likes what he sees. He says so. He gets slapped.
Being dim, he goes and does it again. And again. Eventually he gets laid.
Next time he knows that he just has to approach enough to get sex. And that's all this is about. Our "soceities" rituals for finding a partner are horribly dishonest and broken. A vast male population exists for very good looking women, who, at the very attractive level could pick a different partner every few hours if they really wanted to until time fucked their looks. Few men get this level of choice.
All sexual power resides with women, because they have most of the choice. To then moan about having a few piccies taken etc is just fucking bollocks. Cake and eat it time and not get fat is all that's wanted from the fairer sex and fair play to them, halfwits like Blagsta fall for it.
my two older sisters read a girls magazine in the sixties called ...'jackie' ...no sex no talk of drugs or alcohol ...no abortion advice etc etc ...this mag ws aimed at teenage girls ...i'd guess from the ages of 12 to 16.
should all teenage girl mags go back to this kind of publication?
did it make men grope women in the workplace ...
It's not a cultural view, it's human nature.
Us lads may like to look at big tits and a nice arse, it's just entertaining, same as with lap dancers. It doesn't mean a judge women soley upon whether they these features.
You're reading into it far too much.
what on earth are you on about? See, this is why I made the "pissed" comment - you have a habit of posting on here late at night, picking out one of my posts completely out of context without following the whole debate and then slagging me based on you getting completely the wrong end of the stick.
What the fuck?
Debateable.
Yes, I do too.
You don't think that presenting women as objects feeds into the general patriarchal culture of low pay, shit conditions and abuse against women?