Home Politics & Debate
If you need urgent support, call 999 or go to your nearest A&E. To contact our Crisis Messenger (open 24/7) text THEMIX to 85258.
Options

Delaying having a baby 'defies nature'

124»

Comments

  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    NQA wrote:
    What does it mean then? I and millions of others like cheap DVDs - or at least I like the fact I can afford them. I like to be able to afford cheap foreign travel (even if we decide not to go abroad until my daughters are a bit older) and whilst house prices may have risen, so has the amount of space available per person in the household (ie overcrowding has fallen).

    And there certainly isn't more uncertainty in unemployment than there was in the 30s and whilst more jobs are short-term contracts, the majority aren't and many people like short term contracts because they often pay more and allow you more flexibility.

    Sorry you're still not convincing me that we're worse off than we were in the 70s.

    You must live on a different planet to me then.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    One of the main problems I come across in my work is housing. Basically there isn't any affordable housing anymore in London. There is very little social housing and no more is being built. People on benefits are living in hostels, with people around them smoking crack and OD'ing, no help from the social, government has just cut ALL the funding for training through the jobcentres, New Deal forces people onto inappropriate schemes run by private companies for profit which force people to work for their benefits which basically means that you and me, the taxpayers are propping up private business, there are plans to privatise the entire benefits system etc etc. Go and volunteer at a local homeless shelter or drugs service and you'll see how fucked up it all is. And its getting worse. :mad:
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Blagsta wrote:
    You must live on a different planet to me then.

    Well it would explain why you seem so out of tune with what the rest of us see. Are you stuck on Uranus p'haps? Or possibly just your head is?
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    See my above post.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Just managed to lose a really big post!!! grrrrrrr

    Blagsta it is obvious you are conflating your personal experience with the general national experience, they are not the same............
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Blagsta wrote:
    One of the main problems I come across in my work is housing. Basically there isn't any affordable housing anymore in London. There is very little social housing and no more is being built. People on benefits are living in hostels, with people around them smoking crack and OD'ing, no help from the social, government has just cut ALL the funding for training through the jobcentres, New Deal forces people onto inappropriate schemes run by private companies for profit which force people to work for their benefits which basically means that you and me, the taxpayers are propping up private business, there are plans to privatise the entire benefits system etc etc. Go and volunteer at a local homeless shelter or drugs service and you'll see how fucked up it all is. And its getting worse. :mad:

    I don't think anyway is arguing that the UK is a nice fluffy place for those at the bottom, but I am least am arguing against your rather simplistic view that the majority of people are worse off than they were in the 70s.

    As for those at the bottom I agree we need to do more to help them. I just do not think a socialist/anarchist society (which is what you seem to advocate) is the way to go about it.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Toadborg wrote:
    Just managed to lose a really big post!!! grrrrrrr

    Blagsta it is obvious you are conflating your personal experience with the general national experience, they are not the same............

    Careful, you'll have someone's eye out with that.

    (in other words I think you're projecting that on to me)
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    NQA wrote:
    I don't think anyway is arguing that the UK is a nice fluffy place for those at the bottom, but I am least am arguing against your rather simplistic view that the majority of people are worse off than they were in the 70s.

    As I said - some things are better - but the important things like housing, education, childcare etc are worse.
    NQA wrote:
    As for those at the bottom I agree we need to do more to help them. I just do not think a socialist/anarchist society (which is what you seem to advocate) is the way to go about it.

    Well the current system ain't working is it?
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    One of the main problems I come across in my work is housing. Basically there isn't any affordable housing anymore in London.

    Move people away from london then.
    There is very little social housing and no more is being built.

    So build some.
    People on benefits are living in hostels, with people around them smoking crack and OD'ing

    So band them together and start a company and get cash that way.
    no help from the social,

    Because handouts help us all become better people, don't they?
    government has just cut ALL the funding for training through the jobcentres

    Your problem is that you think someone else is the source of wealth etc, rather than just doing it yourself.
    New Deal forces people onto inappropriate schemes run by private companies for profit which force people to work for their benefits which basically means that you and me, the taxpayers are propping up private business

    So start one yourself and treat people right. Others won't, you will, so you do it.
    Go and volunteer at a local homeless shelter or drugs service and you'll see how fucked up it all is. And its getting worse.

    Why volunteer when you can make cash for all with it?
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Blagsta wrote:
    As I said - some things are better - but the important things like housing, education, childcare etc are worse.

    More people own their own house - I find that good. More people are staying on at school and going to University - I find that good. Childcare has changed because more women have decided they don't just want to be mothers and stay at home - I find that good.

    its probably worth noting in housing the number of rough sleepers is down, so is overcrowding. The number of people living in houses which are unfit for habitation has also fallen.
    Well the current system ain't working is it?

    it works as well as any system works and better than many.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Blagsta wrote:
    I recommend it - you seem quite badly read.

    So you base your beliefs on books and not experience?
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Blagsta wrote:
    As I said - some things are better - but the important things like housing, education, childcare etc are worse.

    For the impoverished, I wouldn't disagree. But the impoverished aren't the only people in society.

    It is true that the system doesn't work - whether you're "working class" or "middle class", you're still forced to work a ridiculously long working week (8/9 hours a day, 5 days a week? Fuck that! :mad: ) for a bunch of money-grabbing fat cats, so you can plough back that money into their coffers. Meanwhile the government try to prevent us from enjoying recreational drug use as safely as possible, continue trying to force us to work harder etc etc.

    No wonder people are becoming increasingly depressed - the system is starting to drag us down, and that realisation is becoming all the more common.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Fuck me it's byny! Long time no see...

    Welcome back...


    Anyway...




    Sorry but this makes no sense.

    What profit and what kind of support are you talking about?

    Are you talking about how families often need two incomes?

    Maternity as a career is obviously going to prevent people from working for private profit - it reduces labour input. This is hardly conducive with business interests, is it?
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Blagsta wrote:
    Just because we can afford shiny trinkets like cheap DVD players and satellite TV does not mean we are better off.

    No. but the ability to purchase those things is a huge part of why both parents work, which is what this thread was about.

    Remember, and I know this is hard for a metropolitan countrymen, London is not representative of the entire country. Not even of the South East.

    So many couples will work so that they can have the foreign holiday, own a house, run two cars (NB this would include the 4x4 for the school run), so that they can shop for the "best" foods, wear labelled clothes etc. I don't disupte that some believe that they "have" to work, but I do wonder if that is just to maintain a certain lifestyle. Not because without it they could not eat of have a roof over their heads.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    No. but the ability to purchase those things is a huge part of why both parents work, which is what this thread was about.

    Remember, and I know this is hard for a metropolitan countrymen, London is not representative of the entire country. Not even of the South East.

    So many couples will work so that they can have the foreign holiday, own a house, run two cars (NB this would include the 4x4 for the school run), so that they can shop for the "best" foods, wear labelled clothes etc. I don't disupte that some believe that they "have" to work, but I do wonder if that is just to maintain a certain lifestyle. Not because without it they could not eat of have a roof over their heads.

    If you don't work, and aren't seeking work, how do you go about getting money in order to survive??
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Spliffie wrote:
    If you don't work, and aren't seeking work, how do you go about getting money in order to survive??

    In my case. It's me that works.

    NB I didn't say that my comments applied to all, but perhaps you might like to look at the increase in foreign holidays, DVD purchases etc - unless the argument is that it's a minority which does that.

    You cannot blame capitalism for personal choices.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    In my case. It's me that works.

    NB I didn't say that my comments applied to all, but perhaps you might like to look at the increase in foreign holidays, DVD purchases etc - unless the argument is that it's a minority which does that.

    You cannot blame capitalism for personal choices.

    Eh?

    You said you doubt work is a necessity for survival - that's blantantly a case of bollocks :yes:

    You can't stay on the dole permanently (although many try). The deal is, you have to be looking for work to qualify for JSA. The other alternatives are crime, begging, claiming benefit under false pretences etc etc.

    Never said it was tiny minority who could afford such things either. Yes most people can splash a bit of cash now and then to support the people who exploit them 5 days out of 7 with shit pay and horrible hours - but that's a big expense.

    Capitalism affects our lives in every aspect. Without long hours and hard work to make a tiny minority insanely wealthy, people have fuck all.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    It is true that the system doesn't work - whether you're "working class" or "middle class", you're still forced to work a ridiculously long working week (8/9 hours a day, 5 days a week? Fuck that! ) for a bunch of money-grabbing fat cats, so you can plough back that money into their coffers.

    So you support socialism because you're under the illusion it would allow you to not work? A 40 hour week doesn't seem excessive and if you don't like working for fat cats they're is plenty of jobs in the public sector or for small companies.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    NQA wrote:
    So you support socialism because you're under the illusion it would allow you to not work? A 40 hour week doesn't seem excessive and if you don't like working for fat cats they're is plenty of jobs in the public sector or for small companies.

    Society could operate a far shorter working week and still be able to function properly.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Spliffie wrote:
    You said you doubt work is a necessity for survival - that's blantantly a case of bollocks :yes:

    I didn't say that and I defy you to show where I did.

    I said that it doesn't take two salaries to survive, generally, but that two salaries equates to a higher standard of living which is why people do it.

    I'm also not ruling out that in some cases two salary are necessary, however I'd add the proviso that often it is because of the lifestyle choices made by that couple thatthey find themselves needing both salaries.

    As I have already sais, we have been a one income familiy for about 10 years. We cope fine, thank you very much. And we live in one of the most expensive areas in the country. We just choose to run one car, rent accomodation and don't holiday abroad every year...
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Spliffie wrote:
    Society could operate a far shorter working week and still be able to function properly.

    It could, but we wouldn't be able to get all the bright shiny trinkets we like.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    II said that it doesn't take two salaries to survive, generally, but that two salaries equates to a higher standard of living which is why people do it.

    Totally agree, we are also a one salary family atm. We don't holiday or if we do its a real cheap thing. Some people won't do that.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    I didn't say that and I defy you to show where I did.

    I said that it doesn't take two salaries to survive, generally, but that two salaries equates to a higher standard of living which is why people do it.

    I'm also not ruling out that in some cases two salary are necessary, however I'd add the proviso that often it is because of the lifestyle choices made by that couple thatthey find themselves needing both salaries.

    As I have already sais, we have been a one income familiy for about 10 years. We cope fine, thank you very much. And we live in one of the most expensive areas in the country. We just choose to run one car, rent accomodation and don't holiday abroad every year...

    Fair enough, I mis-read your post.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Tweety wrote:
    Totally agree, we are also a one salary family atm. We don't holiday or if we do its a real cheap thing. Some people won't do that.


    Yeah - this interests me! I have friends who would never dress ther kids in scond hand clothes which I think is totally rediculous. And they say they would never give their children secondhand toys etc!

    I'd be wiling to accept anything secondhand, so long as it wasn't dangerous. Kids will happily play in a cardboard box as they will on a state of the art rocking horse.. some of the best (And only) holidays I had were camping cheaply in Wales.

    Why do people always feel like they have to give their kids 'the best'
Sign In or Register to comment.