If you need urgent support, call 999 or go to your nearest A&E. To contact our Crisis Messenger (open 24/7) text THEMIX to 85258.
Read the community guidelines before posting ✨
Options
the banning of globe ...
This discussion has been closed.
Comments
Ive learnt plenty from various debates here and elsewhere. I must say I try not to get involved in debates I dont feel i have any prior understanding of, unless its to ask questions rather than debate.
Hey forget about which forum this is, yes some of them are very intelligent people theres no getting away from that but at the end of the day they are no better than anyone else, if they can educate me on something I aint got a clue on then I'll ask them what they mean (even if it is in PM)
We all make mistakes, even the intelligent people...nobodys perfect.
Exactly, we have a choice of which debates to join in with. Ive learned loads of stuff from this forum and I think in mnay ways I discuss things more now than I used to.....I think
many of the issues do vary eith what priorities peoples have and ideoligies etc
globe was annoying but he made it fun to debate with lol
you love arguing with me!
freethepeeps, rabid expletive that that creature is, can label someone a "baby killer" and not even get so much as a warning. why? I'd love to see the justification of that.
Uncle Joe again mentions the "disruptive crumbly" argument, I notice. Using TheSite's demographic, Blagsta, Aladdin, Man of Kent, bongbudda, Clandestine, BeckyBoo, Morroccan Roll, Rainbow Brite, wheresmyplacebo and a few others should be banned. Um, maybe not, eh?
Pay attention, as FTPs might gratingly say I've said that numerous people are currently posting in a fashion that may be bad for fostering a wide range of opinions on this board, including yourself, occasionally. Lots of people (well, a good handful) have, IMO, jumped to conclusions about what FTPs is trying to say about Bandaid, and attacked him personally without justification for that reason. On some sites, they'd be looking at 24 hour 'cooling off' bans, with longer durations to follow if they didn't 'fly straight'. Everyone is getting a lot of leeway, so this 'x should be banned if y gets banned' is just raising the temperature to no good purpose.
'Again'? At age 38 last August, I've always been very wary about using an age argument. Even now, I've phrased it pretty mildly. Let me put it another way: Globe gets treated pretty well for a poster outside the Site demographic who suggested that another poster would happily bend over to be anally 'raped' by an enemy. That's the jist of the comment that got him banned (I wasn't around for his previous ban(s?)), and while he came back to claim that it was an unfair ban - and was given the chance to make that claim - it was the moderators' call, and they haven't changed their minds. And he's still allowed to continue posting as 'Globe'. Again, not doing so badly, particularly since he alleges on Mil.com that leftwing sites, as he claims this one to be, don't tolerate conservative views like his.
I never had it to begin with.
To be honest, I find it quite sad, that he has to go down to that level of personal insults
But what can I say, it says more about him than about me.
Guess no one bothered to inform me...
Or would that be simply wishful thinking, on your part?
the last couple of weeks there have been attcks on him of a personal nature and many times the metion of banning him or wishing he would get banned ...i was curious as to why thats all.
Is this the most pointless thread on the board?
brings up the question, is it hypocritical of the tolerant to drown the intolerant
and kermit i dont say things to that level.....
these extremists as lnog as they dont post stuff that is blatantly false, then they should be allowed to post here
"The hypocrisy!...The hypocrisy...!"
.com doesnt mean a site from the US, while many are not all are american
justify it!
i think i was in a long queue of people and i was by no means at the front.