If you need urgent support, call 999 or go to your nearest A&E. To contact our Crisis Messenger (open 24/7) text THEMIX to 85258.
Read the community guidelines before posting ✨
Options
Take a look around and enjoy reading the discussions. If you'd like to join in, it's really easy to register and then you'll be able to post. If you'd like to learn what this place is all about, head here.
Comments
theres a claim for MAJOR leniacny in that though, not the same as aiming and shooting someone in the back as they running away
Why is it, when proven wrong, you try to suggest you were being funny?
Shut up talking shit Lukesh, I posted the same reference at you
You say you're a christian and are LYING. You are not a christian.
sorry about multiple posting lads, havn't got time to mess about.
If someone broke into my house on a night how would I know if they were armed with any weapon ? How would I know if they were breaking in or gonna rape me ?
You cant ask him to reply because at the end of the day any break in or an intruder on your property can automatically put you in danger, you dont know wether they are high on drugs.......you dont know nothing about the intruder.
thats covered, its up to judge to decide if you used reasonable force
if theyre escaping you wouldnt shoot em in back would you?
Aladdin asked that question to Luke, so I replied with my thoughts.
No I wouldnt shoot...because i aint got a gun, well apart from a water pistol
If they were leaving id let them go and call the police, what id do if they were in my house I honestly dont know. Isd probs just tell em to take whatever they want and hope they got out very quick.
a barrister explained that if you were faced with a real threat to your life ...a mad axe man or even a young thief flashing a knife at you then reasonable force may well be a baseball bat or bullet ...as long as the gun was legal of course.
luke ...if you were to break into my house in the night you would fill me with uncertainty and fear...you would get hurt and may possibly even get yourself killed ...
but if you were a hundred yards away and making your escape ...my fear would have gone ...i would not take aim and shoot you in the back ...like martin did.
I'm sure there can be a million different situations where it is dark, confusing, you're scared and you don't know where the burglars are coming or going. If you shoot in the belief your life is in danger, of course that's a different situation. But it became very clear in Tony Martin's case that none of the above applied. He simply and in cold blood took aim and shot a child as he was running away from his property, and for all we know shouting ''take that you gypsy cunt" as he did so.
That is cold blooded murder. And incredibly, the right wing newspapers and the likes of Luke actually argue Martin should have been allowed to escape prosecution for cold blooded murder.
And those people call themselves Christians!
rolly said "if you were a thief", thats a hypothetical statement, you should've also replied in a hypothetical manner
You are allowed to defend yourself with reasonable force, you are not allowed to by law to shoot someone in the back
In a world where its acceptable to shoot people in the back, whilst they're running away, you've got lots to worry about.
You look at me funny, I shoot you dead, I say you tried to steal my flowers. You don't argue.
You want the law to say its okay to shoot people in the back.
I lived in a country where it was okay to shoot people in the back.
It wasn't a very nice country.........
you're so right, how did martin know that the burgular wasn't running away to get a WMD to blow up his house
So, you agree that Tony Martin committed a crime?
He wasnt just your 'normal' kid though was he, your making him out to be a model citizen when infact he wasnt. How long had tony been taunted by people like him ? I personally feel that he reached the end of his tether, not that its an excuse to kill cos its not.
Tony Martin had no idea of his background when he shot him as he ran away .......
The fact is that shooting someone when they're running away is disproportionate force, you're not actually in any danger .....
how do their rights come first, the little shit should have been arrested and thrown in the cell, not murdered, you're the one that doesn't see the point.
You've just decided that you prefer one criminal to another .....
I didnt say he did, I was clarifying that this lad wasnt just a little innocent kid. i felt as though Aladdin was implying he was a model citizen......just a poor little kid kinda thing.
its irrelevant .........
This is a strange concept. How on earth is one to distinguish between who needs shot and who doesn't
Why ?
Its a part of this story so how can it be irrelevant ?
You just want people to hear one side of the story ?
All have a go at Luke eh and try to make him look stupid.......well you aint gonna try and do the same to me.
The issue is not about the unknown personality and forensic history of the person fleeing as fast as they can, while you point your illegally obtained gun at them.
Its about how the use of disproprtionate force is (rightly so) a crime.