Home Politics & Debate
If you need urgent support, call 999 or go to your nearest A&E. To contact our Crisis Messenger (open 24/7) text THEMIX to 85258.
Read the community guidelines before posting ✨
Options

4 Be 4's To Be Banned!

2

Comments

  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Originally posted by Doofay
    To think i actually thought about voting for the lib dems...

    What will have happened is one of their spokespersons will; ahve made a throwaway comment, and it's been used as "policy" to attack them with.

    ken Livingstone said anyone in London driving a 4x4 was a moron, and deserve to be laughed at. I don't see any criticism of him.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Originally posted by Kermit
    What will have happened is one of their spokespersons will; ahve made a throwaway comment, and it's been used as "policy" to attack them with.

    ken Livingstone said anyone in London driving a 4x4 was a moron, and deserve to be laughed at. I don't see any criticism of him.

    Because Ken is Kool :thumb:
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Originally posted by Renzokuken
    Because Ken is Kool :thumb:

    You misspelt twat then:p
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Originally posted by rachie004
    But the people who need it so they can see over other traffic.. just grrr

    It's the ones who buy them so little Timothy will be "safe" that piss me off.

    Why is it that every car coming out of a private school is a fucking 4x4?

    I've thought of another reason: they are more dangerous to pedestrians in a crash.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Originally posted by Kermit
    You misspelt twat then:p

    My apologies :(;)
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Originally posted by rachie004


    they ARE needed in rural areas..
    But the people who need it so they can see over other traffic.. just grrr
    my son lives in the middle of town ...in winter he cannot get up the icey road without a FbF ...it is just too steep. only main roads get gritted.
    besides ..it's personal friggin choice.
    it\s a b;eedin car and some people may well buy it as a fashion thing but so what ...twenty mondeos or twenty fucking FbF'S OUTSIDE A SCHOOL CUASE THE SAME CONGESTION ...IT'S NOT A FUCKING ARTIC!
    it parks in the same size place a s a cortina.
    what about all this freedom of choice?
    we won't be able to shoot hunt fish drive a car of our choice.
    what about the manufacturers? the jobs?
    it's not an off hand comment by all accounts ...i've just sent the libs a an email saying i won't be voting for them cos of this one single issue ...our freedoms are being ever more eroded ...
    fuck 'em ...i wasn't going to vote for them anyway.
    a landrover or whatever causes no moere congestion than any other motor.
    ...getting stuck behind a caravan?
    round here it's a matter of getting stuck behind a tractor and trailer or a fucking horse box trailer ...attactched to a mondeo!
    a bus a truck ...all can slow our journeys down ...a fucking range rover does not cause thise probs.
    will they ban green wellies next cos they look shite?
    how about bringing in an energy tax for asll the people who leave all those standby little lights on asll over the house when they are asleep ...takes a couple of power stations to run all your standbys whilst your sleeping.
    it's a fucking car for gods sake!
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    how about banning private jets ...private planes full stop ...they certainly don't do 35 to the gallon.
    how about banning yachts. golf buggies.

    it's a fucking car!
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    With all respect MR reckon you've caught up the end of the news piece and misunderstood something. I'm pretty sure the government has no plans to ban 4 x 4s. You were probably hearing the personal opinion of one politician (such as Ken) or the recommendation of a lobbying group.

    I hate seeing 4 x 4s in cities. I don't think they should be banned but those people who insist on driving vehicles that are completely unsuitable for city use should be made to pay the price.

    As far as city driving is concerned 4 x 4s are gas-guzzling, impractical, bulky and considerably more dangerous vehicles than normal cars. If people insist on driving them on clogged towns and cities either to compensate for any shortcoming they might have in the genital department or because they think their kids will be 'safer' when driven to school (some mums would drive a fucking Challenger 2 tank if they knew how :mad: ) then they should indeed be made to pay for their selfishness.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Originally posted by Aladdin
    With all respect MR reckon you've caught up the end of the news piece and misunderstood something. I'm pretty sure the government has no plans to ban 4 x 4s. You were probably hearing the personal opinion of one politician (such as Ken) or the recommendation of a lobbying group.

    I hate seeing 4 x 4s in cities. I don't think they should be banned but those people who insist on driving vehicles that are completely unsuitable for city use should be made to pay the price.

    As far as city driving is concerned 4 x 4s are gas-guzzling, impractical, bulky and considerably more dangerous vehicles than normal cars. If people insist on driving them on clogged towns and cities either to compensate for any shortcoming they might have in the genital department or because they think their kids will be 'safer' when driven to school (some mums would drive a fucking Challenger 2 tank if they knew how :mad: ) then they should indeed be made to pay for their selfishness.
    not the governement alladin ..the libdems proposal.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Oh I see...

    I've reckon they've been nicking ideas from forums such as this one... 50% on amounts over 100K, ban 4 x 4s... It's all been said here before :D

    Anyway, as I said I would not want them banned but in the same way as there is a congestion charge in London I'd like to see a '4x4 charge' as well.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    The only people who need 4x4's are farmers and people in the construction trade.
    They are too big for the roads and cause no end of accidents when they straddle 2 lanes.
    I hate them with a passion.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Sorry, having read the last few pages it looks like you actually need someone who knows about cars, and convieniently here I am.

    List of things wrong with 4x4s
    • High centre of gravity, making them likely to roll at relativly low speeds
    • Have been known to have inadaquate protection for fuel tanks, making them more likely to explode in a crash
    • Are proven to be twice as deadly on impact for a pedestrian (put in context and 40mph in a standard saloon you are likely to kill, at 20mph in a 4x4 the same is true)
    • 4x4 are the most environmentally harmful on the market, emitting up to four (convieniently) times more CO2. And doing approximatly 12mpg IN TRAFFIC. Lets remember Rolly, with your 35mpg, it's aqquired on an open road in 5th gear
    • Motorists hit by side impact by a 4x4 are 27 times more likely to die than in an impact with another vehicle

    Here's another interesting set of statistics
    According to research carried out by Black Horse Motor Finance, which has compiled a UK 4WD Buyers League based on purchases made by more than 70,000 of its customers including new and used vehicles, it shows the number of purchases of 4x4s in the UK as a proportion of the total number of cars bought and sold as: -

    · London - 14.9%

    · South Midlands - 14.2%

    · South East - 13.8%

    · West Midlands - 13.3%

    · South West - 13.0%

    · East Anglia - 13.0%

    · Wales - 12.8%

    · East Midlands - 12.0%

    · (UK Average - 11.9%)

    · North East - 10.8%

    · Scotland - 10.2%

    · North West - 10.2%

    · Northern Ireland - 10.1%

    How bizzare, don't you think, that more 4x4s are bought in london, than say, wales or scotland, where the road quality is less.

    4x4s are lethal, and should not be allowed on motorways, should probably have speed limiters fitted, and should be discouraged from being brought into densley populated areas.

    Porche have just brought out a 4x4, what are you doing with a porche 4x4! You're never going to take it anywhere near a field, and Land Rover Vogue, name says it all really.

    Interesting story for you here, you're either going to laugh or cry.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Originally posted by Aladdin
    Anyway, as I said I would not want them banned but in the same way as there is a congestion charge in London I'd like to see a '4x4 charge' as well.

    Been reading up on actual libdem policy, they want to charge £10 for 4x4 in london.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    I assume that's per day? Makes sense to me.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Originally posted by Aladdin
    I assume that's per day? Makes sense to me.

    yes, standard c-charge rules, just up to £10.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    You still haven’t caught the point?
    A democratically elected government is free to ban e-v-e-r-y-t-h-I-n-g. Because Vox Populi is the same that Vox Dei isn’t it?
    PS
    To Fiend_85
    You say 4x4 are the most environmentally harmful on the market, emitting up to four (convieniently) times more CO2.
    CO2 is a pollutant?! So you believe in this Greenies' the-most-stupid-for-thousand-years piece of shit? Mein Liber Gott…
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Originally posted by LabRat
    CO2 is a pollutant?! So you believe in this Greenies' the-most-stupid-for-thousand-years piece of shit? Mein Liber Gott…

    It is a greenhouse gas. The point of the 'greenies' arguement is that we don't actually understand the planet's ecosystem yet.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Originally posted by lukesh
    more evidense that pc has gone completely bonkers!

    Not sure what this thread has in connection with political correctness...?

    I've read a few of the comments here about the danger of 4x4s and ask if those people who would ban these cars on this basis would also consider banning lorries, busses and motorbikes as well?
    Originally posed by Lab Rat
    Vox Populi ... Vox Dei

    Another long lost user of this forum. Whatever happened to him anyway...?
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Originally posted by Man Of Kent
    I've read a few of the comments here about the danger of 4x4s and ask if those people who would ban these cars on this basis would also consider banning lorries, busses and motorbikes as well?

    It's to do with need of equipment, not an all out ban.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Originally posted by Fiend_85
    It is a greenhouse gas. The point of the 'greenies' arguement is that we don't actually understand the planet's ecosystem yet.
    No, the point of greenies’ argument is that THEY understand the planet’s ecosystem and know how to control it.( Montreal’s and Kyoto’s idiocies are nice evidences) That is nothing but their ignorance and arrogance.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    We know that CO2 is a greenhouse gas, and that in abundance affects the planets temperature. The thing is we also know that the planet is in fairly regular cycles of hot and cold. We want to control the temperature of the planet because we like it the way it is.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    The only ignorance and arrogance is that of the neo-cons and the oil barons on this world who actually claim there is not such thing as global warming.

    The evil selfish cunts.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Originally posted by Man Of Kent
    Another long lost user of this forum. Whatever happened to him anyway...?
    Xkuze me… it seems I’ve missed the point.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Originally posted by Aladdin
    The only ignorance and arrogance is that of the neo-cons and the oil barons on this world who actually claim there is not such thing as global warming.

    The evil selfish cunts.
    Blaming neocons of all possible sins you drive yourself into the narrow procrustean cage of modern socialist politics. If the current US administration controlled by neocons says 2+2=3 that doesn’t mean that a green gang controlling UN is right saying 2+2=5. The current situation is similar to pre-WWII world when two socialist gangs fascists and communists fought for the world dominance. The war was a direct result of their efforts and if WWIII happens we will have to thanks both left-wing and right-wing socialists for it.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Originally posted by LabRat
    The war was a direct result of their efforts and if WWIII happens we will have to thanks both left-wing and right-wing socialists for it.

    What the hell is a right wing socialist? :eek2:
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Originally posted by LabRat
    Blaming neocons of all possible sins you drive yourself into the narrow procrustean cage of modern socialist politics.

    I notice that you totally ignored all the other points made about the flaws in 4x4s...
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Originally posted by Fiend_85
    I notice that you totally ignored all the other points made about the flaws in 4x4s...
    True. I don’t recognise anybody’s rights to control other people’s shopping. If you like to buy a 7x7s car or a submarine or a ton of cocaine it’s your own business, not mine.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Originally posted by Fiend_85
    It's to do with need of equipment, not an all out ban.

    So ban cars completely for any collection of houses which has a public transport link with a mile - as most people can walk this far...

    There are very few people who need a car, it's just more convenient. How many people need a sports car for example. Just because we don't like 4x4s doesn't mean that they should be banned.

    I agree that the risk of injury, if you are hit by one, is higher but that isn't a reason either.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Originally posted by Renzokuken
    What the hell is a right wing socialist? :eek2:
    The same thing as an 'anarcho-capitalist'. An utopian oxymoron.

    I think most people are against a ban MoK. But most people would agree that 4 x 4s are by nature much more polluting, inconvenient and dangerous vehicles than ordinary cars; that they are particularly unsuitable for towns and cities; and that anyone who insist on driving them in urban areas should be made to pay for the privilege.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Originally posted by Renzokuken
    What the hell is a right wing socialist? :eek2:
    People whose views on how stolen money should be redistributed, what a kind of law should be foisted on others, which stuff kids should be taught at school, which kind of lifestyle is bad and should be forbidden, which things should be banned from markets, which groups should be privileged by the government at expense of less lucky groups, who has the right to control this or that, etc. are slightly different from analogical views of left socialists. You should agree though that this difference is tiny comparing with things that united them- that robbery, redistribution, coercive laws, compulsory curriculum, controlled markets, bans, privileges, restrictions, regulations, the state’s spending on their pet project, so on are good.
    Typical examples of right-wing socialists are fascists and neo-cons.
Sign In or Register to comment.