If you need urgent support, call 999 or go to your nearest A&E. To contact our Crisis Messenger (open 24/7) text THEMIX to 85258.
Read the community guidelines before posting ✨
Options
Take a look around and enjoy reading the discussions. If you'd like to join in, it's really easy to register and then you'll be able to post. If you'd like to learn what this place is all about, head here.
Comments
Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha!
You are so politically misinformed its fucking hilarious!
Monarchism is the fucking antithesis of anarchism you utter utter utter loon! Look up the etymology of the words sometime... :rolleyes:
Where do you get your political knowledge from? The back of a cereal box?
then have a wonder why people fought so hard to have democracy.
i don't know how some of you people manage to fucking dress yourselves of a morning.
No, I don’t read things written on the back of cereal box. ( maybe it is interesting? Do you recommend to read it?) I read works of wise men like Lysander Spooner, Gustave Molinari, David Friedman, Murray Rothbard, Anthony de Jasay…you maybe never heard the names, it’s not surprising in the statist world. It would be really strange if for example such a masterpiece of social thought like No Treason by Spooner was taught in state schools…
Yes you did. You said
"Yes, it’s very Libertarian and Anarchist. The fact that you don’t see it proves you don’t understand nothing in Libertarianism nor Anarchy."
Which shows that you have a very confused understanding of libertarianism and anarchism.
None of them are anarchists.
"That government is best which governs least"
"That government is best which governs not at all"
If it is not libertarian and anarchist that the opposite “That government is best which governs most" is libertarian and anarchist?
And you have the nerve to blame me in misunderstanding and confusing? How can you judge if you never read them?
http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/hobbes-moral/
Jesus, this is like pulling teeth :rolleyes:
Anarchists are against the whole concept of the state, of government or of any form of top down hierarchical organisation. And as such, the concept of anarchists wanting a monarchy is ludicrous. The 2 concepts are diametrically opposed opposites.
I know about anarchist politics and philosophy, and these aren't anarchists. They are free market libertarians. A big difference.
There are also other kinds of proof in Monarchy‘s favour, like this by Bertrand de Jouvenel : ”But by opening the prospect of Power to all the ambitious talents, this arrangement makes the extension of Power much easier. Under the “ancien regime”, society’s moving spirits, who had, as they knew, no chance of a share in Power, were quick to denounce its smallest encroachment. Now, on the other hand, when everyone is potentially a minister, no one is concerned to cut down an office to which he aspires one day himself, or to put sand in a machine which he means to use himself when his turn comes. Hence, it is that there is in the political circles of a modern society a wide complicity in the extension of Power.”
Also in democracy if the person is corrupt or is unpopular the person can be removed in a election. In a monarchy they is no mechanism where a unpopular mmonarchy can be removed and that it could lead to bloody civil war such as the English Civil War