If you need urgent support, call 999 or go to your nearest A&E. To contact our Crisis Messenger (open 24/7) text THEMIX to 85258.
Read the community guidelines before posting ✨
Options
Take a look around and enjoy reading the discussions. If you'd like to join in, it's really easy to register and then you'll be able to post. If you'd like to learn what this place is all about, head here.
Comments
I'd rather that the equivalent to £15 million of taxpayers money that was used on the recent wedding here, was used on education instead.
Well i cant stand the royals so i know which i would prefer out of the two
If you look at the actual figures you'll learn that the royal family generate a not insubstantial profit for the UK treasury. But ofcourse, you knew that.
blackpool tower when it comes to amusement rides ...
and that prince andrew generates nearly as much money for the uk economy as scarborough.
No, how should I know that. Please explain.
Would you like to rephrase that into some kind of coherent argument? Or maybe a sentence?
If we got rid of the monarchy they'd walk away considerably richer than they are at the moment.
And why you're at it why don't you just hang everyone else with earnings over £50'000 a year? How dare anyone be affluent.
in my opinion, if thats yoiur only argument for retraing them as oposed to handing them over to blagsta then i'll tell you a little secret; if we stuffed them and put them on show in their palaces and open them up to the world ...we'd make five times as much!
'the history tour of the u.k's fascination for dysfunctional european families' bloody germans ...bombed our chippies you know.
Did you read the post? The money I was referring to isn't generated through tourism you bloody tool. It's from their PRIVATE ESTATE which they're surrendering to the UK treasury.
i was predicting the usualy so predictable e in this same old topic.
you new this would turn into one of these didn't you alladin ...
Yeah and where did that come from?
I know, I was taking the piss.
We could charge admission that would raise a few pennies for the treasury and give our tourism a boast!!!
Not the taxpayer. Which shatters you're little "we'd be richer without them" argument.
bernahrd manning marries the queen ...
it's tasteless ...tacky ...and has no place in a 21st century democracy. you know democracy ...that thing were forcing down peoples throats with the aid of our weapons of mass destruction.
So what precisely is wrong with an institution that serve as a source of tourism, generate a profitable income for the UK treasury and act as a figurehead for the country?
i'd tell you what my house is worth but you might fucking choke on your arrogance.