Home Politics & Debate
If you need urgent support, call 999 or go to your nearest A&E. To contact our Crisis Messenger (open 24/7) text THEMIX to 85258.
Read the community guidelines before posting ✨
Options

After 18 years of hell, a hero is released

13»

Comments

  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Okay. Sorry I thought you had said people of certain nationality were denied citizenship or residence in Denmark if they married a Danish person while people of other nationalities were allowed.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Certainly Jacq, I shall explain what should be obvious given all my constant admonitions to make an effort to do some personal legwork and dig into the record. The answer on that matter is that these are a well established and well documented figures on the founding, leadership and development of Israel's political agenda of whom many people - who have not done more than glance at the evening news (or who might be too young) - might not have had any idea as to their own backgrounds in what is routinely decried as "terrorism" (and its open support) today.

    A list of names is in itself a verfiable basis for further personal study in relation to key terms I have already repeatedly indicated, "Haganah", "Irgun", and "Stern Gang". But if needs be I will gladly provide additional reference material if the thread so warrants (since it seems to be increasingly apparent you would rather dismiss and retain your ideological comfort zone than read and consider the numerous other links provided).
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Originally posted by Clandestine
    Certainly Jacq, I shall explain what should be obvious given all my constant admonitions to make an effort to do some personal legwork and dig into the record. The answer on that matter is that these are a well established and well documented figures on the founding, leadership and development of Israel's political agenda of whom many people - who have not done more than glance at the evening news (or who might be too young) - might not have had any idea as to their own backgrounds in what is routinely decried as "terrorism" (and its open support) today.

    A list of names is in itself a verfiable basis for further personal study in relation to key terms I have already repeatedly indicated, "Haganah", "Irgun", and "Stern Gang". But if needs be I will gladly provide additional reference material if the thread so warrants (since it seems to be increasingly apparent you would rather dismiss and retain your ideological comfort zone than read and consider the numerous other links provided).

    Hypocrisy.

    Either way, I am not in doubt that what is written has happened. I just don't believe that it came as much out of the blue, as those links tries to make it appear (context is a very important thing), and that we're as bad as you want and hope we are.

    Actually you of all people should know how vital and important background and context is when presenting such kind of biography. Unless what you deal with is mere manipulations and through propaganda.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    I never said it came out of the blue, considering that the more detailed reviews i provided to links to spell out clearly the progressive execution of the Zionist agenda from its inception in the late 1800's through the progressive immigrations into the land under the Ottoman and British mandates and the rise of the final militant drive (aka terrorism) that led ultimately to the abandonment of the territory by the British and the expulsion of hundreds of of thousands of orignal Palestinian landowners (along with the assumption of absentee owner land thanks to contrived land laws.

    No jacq, this is not about you or any average Israeli Joe citizen as you constantly wish to make my comments out to be. This is about a prevailing political dogma that has governed both the establishment and continuance of a truly racist state model itself and one that is wholly alien to the region (i.e. the transposition of turko-slavic culture into a previously Arab cultural milieu (regardless of religion).

    Until that colonialist-era doctrine is abandoned and Israel opened up to embrace all the indigenous people of the land equally and not with preference to one set over another (as any modern self-proclaimed democratic state should do), the revision and lies of Zionism will continue to evade historic accountability for its wrongdoings and no true peace will occur.

    What is astounding is just how great an effort Israel and its zionist leaders insist on expending in creating and reiterating a false historic record and constant excusatory PR for their attrocities rather than acknowledging the truth, atoning and embracing their neighbours as equals in a single constructive and dynamically creative state.

    The latter option would be so much more cleansing spiritually and mentally than the continued conflict and exclusivism which is reinforced daily by the maintenance of Zionist thinking.

    Sorry if you cannot see the true concern for all (Israeli and Palestinian) that is contained in the issue I raise with the ongoing status quo.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Clandestine,

    I know you're from Belgium so I do understand if you have the same mentality that the EU has in feeling it impose it's agenda on anyone it likes but I fail to see why you are so obsessed with Israeli domestic law. Why should a non-Israeli who marries an Israeli get automatic citizenship? I don't know of any country that automatically grants citizenship to the husband/wife of a citizen.

    When the Arabs are chopping people's hands off with kangaroo courts I consider Israeli marriage law a pretty minor issue.

    Considering that Israel is not the only country to have such marriage laws yet it is Israel you single out and I will ask as I have asked before is it coincidence that the one country that gets singled out time after time also happens to be the only Jewish state?

    It seems that one of the reasons for your disliking of Israel is that it is a Jewish state. Would I be right in saying that you would like to see Israel become a secular state like say France?

    To which I say, there are 23 Arab/Iranian regimes in the Middle East. There is one Jewish state. When the Arabs offer complete religious freedom, I'll agree with you in saying that so should Israel.

    Here's just one example of the kind of religious freedom you'll see in Arab states:

    A mosque in Rome? Sure. A non-Muslim in Mecca? No.
    http://www.opinionjournal.com/taste/?id=110003943

    There are NO Christian churches in Saudi Arabia...Israel has dozens; if you're in the area and fancy exercising religious freedom here's a list of churches:
    http://www.d.co.il/?arena=Business&headingCode=21240&headingName=CHURCHES%20%26%20CONVENTS&language=EN&page=Business-Results&previousPage=Headings

    Did you know that the only free Arab press in the Middle East is published in Israel? Kind of ironic isn't it? There's the Jerusalem Times, Al-Quds, Palestine Report and others.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Originally posted by J
    Funny how the only thing people fight over is land and material goods.

    The Arabs have 99.9% of the Middle East. Palestinians could be resettled tomorrow if the oil rich Arab states wanted to resettle them. But, they would never do that; they would rather use them as a political tool against Israel.

    Seeing as they fled Israel as they were told to do so by the Arabs (who wrongly assumed they would defeat Israel) it is the Arabs responsibility to resettle them.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    They fled the land (not then yet even called Israel) as a result of militant early zionist land clearances (I happen to know quite few whose families were driven out at gunpoint or shot by members of the Irgun). This revisionist nonsense you claim is part of the lie that keeps the conflict going ad inifinitum.

    How you can justify advocating that they should go live elsewhere when they have every right to return to their own property is sickening. I truly would love to see your reaction if your home was confiscated and your family forced out into a refugee camp and told it was your own fault and that your people never owned the land in the first place regardless of any legally binding deed of ownership you might possess and that you were a terrorist if you dared fight back (as I'm sure you would).

    Yours is the very sort of denial mentality that I find equally repulsive in those who claim the holocaust never happened.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Originally posted by Clandestine


    Yours is the very sort of denial mentality that I find equally repulsive in those who claim the holocaust never happened.

    You know what just struck me?
    Time and time again you blame the "Zionists" to pull the "Holocaust-card"... Yet, you constantly do so yourself.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Excuse me?? considerable difference in acknowledging that the holocaust took place and "using the holocaust card" (i.e. using the holocaust to repeatedly reinforce the eternal victim image and thus excuse one's own evils towards others even up to the present day) as you put it jacq. Are you seriously that incapable of comprehending the context in which terms are used? Having indeed demanded that "context is important" just a few posts back.

    Seems you will twist any comment to mean something it does not so long as you can avoid coming to terms with the historic record of Zionist attrocities.

    The point is, revisionism is revisionism and equally repugnant whether being employed to deny the record of evils perpetrated against the Jews or used by Israeli leaders to whitewash the historic record of their own brutalities and serve their ideological agenda.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Exactly... context.
    Look in what context you used the reference to the Holocaust, somewhere where it wasn't too relevant.
    While when looking at the creation of the state of Israel, it's a keypoint.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Its becoming apparent that you indeed do have comprehension problems if you cannot see that the context and use of the reference was indeed pertinent to the poiint being made. Try slowly if it helps you, it's about the revisionist mentality attempting to rewrite history, understand the basic principle at work there?
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Originally posted by Clandestine
    Try slowly if it helps you

    Cause digging that low, is really gonna make me keen on what you have to say.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Im not fooled into thinking you ever have been, Jacq.

    The fact remains you demonstrate a lack of understanding for the application of "principle".
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Principle in relation to what?
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    In relation to applying the same principle of thought equally, as clearly spelled out in the posts you have so seemingly chosen to twist into a meaning not contained therein.

    Once again, the "principle" of revisionism of the historic record is repugnant whether it is is practiced by those who deny the holocaust (as a documented historic and brutal event) or the longrunning effort of the Zionist camp to revise and whitewash its own documented historic brutalities toward Palestinians).

    Are we getting closer to understanding the application of "principle"?

    No lasting peace will ever be achieved so long as the lies continue to advance the continuation of an outdated colonialist-era politcal dogma.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Is it now that I am supposed to "stare" at you in awe, and say WOW?

    Either way, there's no denying of anything. Merely disagreemeant on facts.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    No Jacq, my interest isnt to gain a sycophant, that I leave to the Bush and Sharon's of the world. My interest is merely to get you to practice some intellectual honesty in regonising the fact that principles remain constant regardless of who is perpetrating a given act.

    As for what you term "disagreement on facts", you demonstrate by your very posts as indeed being evasion and denial and refusal to scrutinise objectively. Hardly surprising though. Perhaps like a zebra a zionist simply "cannot change his stripes".
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Originally posted by Clandestine
    My interest is merely to get you to practice some intellectual honesty in regonising the fact that principles remain constant regardless of who is perpetrating a given act.

    That is not your problem, nor concern.
    But if you're really interested in that, then maybe you should show an example and follow your own words :)
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Nice dodge once again and entirely in keeping with your refusal to come to terms with what is indeed Intellectually honest criticism of a brutal state doctrine.

    At least you finally made it abundantly clear that there is no intellectual curiosity in you nor capacity to assess your hand me down ideology in light of historic reality.

    Further discussion is therefore pointless.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Originally posted by Clandestine

    Further discussion is therefore pointless.

    Told you that a long time ago... But nice to see that you're catching up. Better late than never.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Originally posted by Jacqueline the Ripper
    Told you that a long time ago... But nice to see that you're catching up. Better late than never.
    At least you have the honesty to admit it isn't worth trying to discuss things with you.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Originally posted by Carriage Return
    At least you have the honesty to admit it isn't worth trying to discuss things with you.

    No of course it isn't worth discussing with me, when setting standards you don't uphold yourself.
    I have more selfrespect than simply smiling and nodding.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Yes you would know all about setting standards that you dont keep yourself. ;)
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Originally posted by Clandestine
    Yes you would know all about setting standards that you dont keep yourself. ;)

    Hmm, a bit of a rushed comment, huh?
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Actually a comment of amusement.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Amusing in which way? :confused:
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Amused by your continued excuses. You have a neverending supply it seems.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    You have totally lost me...
Sign In or Register to comment.