If you need urgent support, call 999 or go to your nearest A&E. To contact our Crisis Messenger (open 24/7) text THEMIX to 85258.
Read the community guidelines before posting ✨
Options
Saddam Captured!!!!!
BillieTheBot
Posts: 8,721 Bot
Just been watching sky news and it appears Saddam Hussain was captured in Tikrit in the early hours of the morning.
http://www.sky.com/skynews/article/0,,30000-1115282,00.html
http://www.sky.com/skynews/article/0,,30000-1115282,00.html
Beep boop. I'm a bot.
0
Comments
*dances around*
Edited to add (aren't I good Clandestine? :flirt: ) Look at the Iraqis celebrating on the streets. That view is pure GOLD!
No word on any televised coverage of DNA results. Not of course thats its not him and all the better if it is, but DNA testing is not an instantaneous science.
Will this make any big difference to the attacks against Allied forces though? I suspect not.
Although it is good news.
We could see in weeks to come that its merely a double, although if it were I wouldnt be surprised if it werent aknowledged publically. Too much political capital to be gained by Bush and co by playing up the capture.
But anyway, I wonder what contrived charge the USA will find to execute him.
Either way they do have DNA of him, whether it's old or from last night I don't know.
I think Clandestine was wrong actually, and DNA can be tested very quickly if they have the equipment there. Which convbeniently they did.
So it probably is him.
But has everyone seen that little cunt Blair on the news, saying that its a wonderful day for the world and that the Iraqis should just be FUCKING GRATEFUL that the wonderful Bushites have saved them from a dictator. My only surprise is that the little f*ggot hasnt claimed that Al Qaeda has been destroyed too :rolleyes:
Im not suprised Clandestine doesnt believe its him , after all , dont you believe that the US attacked itself on September 11?
At least he hopes it...
Welcome back to the boards
They did.
And if it's Saddam they caught,it's about time.
Yes, cause if you'd personally been in Iraq, then Saddam would have been sitting in a cell a long time ago, along with Bin Laden who you'd caught the 12th of September 2001 in Afghanistan.
Its not really, what exactly has changed? Saddam went in May, Halliburton are still overchargiung by US$67million, the US are still running the show. Whats changed with his capture?
Havent you ever thought how convenient it was that the FBI and the CIA didnt have an inkling that 11/9 was about to happen, even after loads of people had warned them? The US didnt attack itself, but it definitely didnt do very much to stop it, did it?
And what could the US have done? Put an entire nation on "house arrest"? Execute every individual of Mid-east origin, upon detection?
Activiate the miniture nuclear device inserted into the brainstem of every person at birth? But only within those emitting the brain-wave signature of potential terrorist?
How about re-establishing that tenuous link to reality, and rejoining those not handicapped by an anal/cranial inversion, Kermit?
It could have started by increasing security at the airports in Boston, surely?
The fact alone that notification of the deviation of course of the planes was made by ATC before the first plane had even hit, compunded by the fact that fighters were well within striking range to intercept in advance of the second tower hit and certainly the Pentagon strike leaves little doubt to those who don't buy the bogus inconsistent coverstory that our fighters were sufficiently delayed in being authorised for launch.
What could have been done?
FAA regulations and standard domestic defence procedure that stipulates all airliners not responsding to immediate calls for course correction once insisted by ATC are to be intercepted and shot down if found to be a threat could well have been followed. If so, likely 9/11 would never have resulted in the deaths of so many and certainly not provided the shock and trauma this admin needed to launch its unlateralist doctrine for unrelated warfare without significant scrutiny.
But we've been through this before and the blind knee jerk reactionaries will remain blind, so its little point rehashing.
Read and decide for yourselves...
http://reactor-core.org/unanswered-questions/Part1B.html
Naw... the whiny ass conspiracy-theorist liberals would have been "inconvenienced" in the far right coup to deprive them of "everything", including their foo-foo water...
Can you not just witness the collaborator throwing a tantrum when his "constitutional rights" are violated by security? :rolleyes: It is a play by Ashcroft to enslave him, I tell you!
Apparently, you are still "out of the loop" concerning the manner in which the aircraft "landed"... the one generally credited to have been grounded by the "encouragement" of the passengers...
Can you say "Air National Guard"?
But then... to have any more information than what you are allowed? Would belie your immanent status, would it not?
{sarcasm intended, for the benefit of those challenged of discernment}
Yeah, yeah... I can hear your bleating already... :crazyeyes
Self-righteous parasitic infestations - such as yourself - are what compel OPSEC in the first place...
The questions concern those planes which were allowed to hit their target not the one which crashed in a field.
Just keep right on with your collaborator nonsense Thanatos, you only demonstrate your own collaboration with those posing the greatest threat to our way of life and lack of comprehension both with regard to my position regarding the security of our land as well as the machinations of the political arena and its principle proponents.
But then one wouldnt expect an Oregon redneck to have a clue about much of anything. Bleat on, oh blind sheep - Baaaaaaaaaaaaaaah!
http://foi.missouri.edu/terrorismfoi/911investigation.html
Seems Thanatos is so out of the loop (as he likes to claim of others) that he is unaware of how many obstacles this administration has put in the way of authorised investigations.
But of course our resident redneck doesnt have enough balance of perspective nor civic duty to ask the tough question, "Just what are you hiding from the American Public Mr. Bush, Mr. Cheney, Mr. Rumsfeld, et al?"
And the Neo-con "Daisy Chain" happily continues to pat itself on the back and disgrace the memories of the thousands of victims by looking the other way. "Oooh look theres another country where we can go shoot and bomb civilians, that should keep us too busy to ask any questions!" :rolleyes:
Never actually been to the United States, have you?
If you had? Then you would be aware that "rednecks" reside across the nation from Oregon.
Keep up with all of your bullshit deep south aspersions... perhaps... someday... you might even become sufficiently educated to read a map.
Terrible news, concerning Saddam...
So entertaining, reading your rants about the lies and distortions coming from the evil one, GWB. Why not go back and read Profiles In Courage, again. You know... the book where JFK writes that "leaders must be courageous enough to lead the sheep to where they need to go, because they are too gutless and ignorant to know or do what is good for them"... Or is it only a "travesty to the Constitution" when a conservative is in the oval office?
Again - one LAST time - for the reading and comprehension challenged:
I do not follow ANYONE blindly. I trust politicians only so far as they parallel my perspective. And the only thing worse than a politician? Is a "political activist" or bureaucratic parasite - such as yourself - who feasts off the labor of others, while contributing NOTHING but disorder. Your "efforts" do nothing but empower an enemy committed to the destruction of the western world.
Sheep?
{edit} > Still cannot post without a reference to the "neo-con conspiracy", can you?
ROTFLMMFAO!
"We got him!":rolleyes: Typical
What should they have said?
I dont know, something more formal prehaps.
Born and raised in the US as much as you with a brother in Washington State, so I'm well acquainted with the emotionally challenged Oregon yahoo mentality, thank you very much.
Once again proving you are as inbalanced as you are partisan and clueless as to the machinations of the political arena. You contribute nothing of any intellectual calibre to any discussion you hijack with your typical childish derision. Go back and get an education and perhaps you might find some relief from your perpetually recurrent flashbacks to Nam.
Just keep avoiding any display of critical reasoning, you are so adept at it and it suits the caricature you portray of the standard neo-con neanderthal. We wouldnt want to challenge you beyond your demonstrated capacities. lol.
And thus you confirm your hypocrisy, slandering and attacking others for the very willful failure you indeed subscribe to. So long as they pander to your unresolved aggressive tendencies and whip up your self-imposed paranoia, you will not question their intent nor their agenda nor the hollow rhetoric and lies they use to capitalise upon your willing submission.. good little lacky!
Of course, we see how you spit and cuss and protest your wrongful characterisation whilst presuming, as you ever do, to know anything about anyone you choose to flame. I am not a bureaucrat, I work within no administration. I do work with adminsitrations and agencies as an external contracting analyst but then who needs to be accurate when your only concern is where the protagonists of your militant delusions will throw the next whoop ass party.
No Than, you spout the drivel that could be just as easily and far more elequently suffered through by switiching to The O'Reilly Factor or any number of neo-con pundits polluting and dulling the minds of the nation. Youre qa washed out wannabe with an axe to grind and zero involvement in the circles that matter.
But you do live up to the stereotype and thus are all too easily dismissed as another misinformed and hate-filled Bushbot.
It's a good thing, and it's best to be as clear about it as possible.
Formalities and elevated language is only good when dealing with the bad things going on.