If you need urgent support, call 999 or go to your nearest A&E. To contact our Crisis Messenger (open 24/7) text THEMIX to 85258.
Read the community guidelines before posting ✨
Options
Take a look around and enjoy reading the discussions. If you'd like to join in, it's really easy to register and then you'll be able to post. If you'd like to learn what this place is all about, head here.
Comments
Do your own homework.
Anything which I post on this forum will be called "a lie" by your gurus the collaborator and aladdin. Regardless of how accurate it is.
Find the truth for yourself...
He wasn't asking you, and it's a pretty long winded way of telling us you don't know
Not in this lifetime I suspect.
If you actually know 1/10th of what you claim, then you know that Hussein was sentenced to death - in Iraq - LONG before he came to power.
Thrill us with your grasp of history, self-proclaimed guru... :rolleyes:
If you have some obscure point to make by referring to something to events prior to Saddam's rise to power, when the train of the discussion concerns his acts whilst in power, then Im sure there are quite a few here who are just salivating to see you demonstrate some capacity for linkage.
Oh and your hate-filled delusions must be slipping towards outright psychosis. I never called myself anyone's guru, nor have any interest whatsoever to be such. "guru" is another of your stock in trade quips, so by definition it was never a "self-proclaimed" status.
Don't worry though, we know youve had trouble expressing coherent thought since the head injury. Just take it slow old man, and don't forget to take your meds.
Or that using the cover of this story breaking, GWB signed Patriot Act II?
What it seems clear is that he was shopped by somebody (as opposed to being found by chance or thanks to US intelligence).
Don't be too surprised if O. bin Laden is "captured" just before the November elections as well.
(Sorry, I thought I might as well use this thread for Iraq news since it's related)
Poor Blair! Just when it seemed things were starting to look up a bit, along comes more humiliation with regard to those elusive WMDs.
Firstly, Paul Bremer rejects Blair's claims that "massive evidence" of clandestine WMDs labs had been found, and describes it as a red herring (later, when he was told it was Bush's faithful poodle who'd made the claims, he backtracked ). Bremer rubbishes Blair's claims.
Then it is revealed that Britain's Secret Services embarked in a disinformation campaign in the British Press to "sell" the concept that Saddam had WMDs.
And finally he receives a barrage of criticism, not only from his own MPs but from religious leaders high in the Church, who call him and Bush "vigilantes" amongst many other things and highlight their hypocrisy.
Oh dear dear. Humiliated by vital allies, proven (yet again) a liar and demolished by the second highest official in the Church of England. What has the man done to deserve this?
but now it's convenient to let them do it their way ...more double standards and crap. and no i haven't read the whole thread so if someones already said this ...tough.
But then again, what chances are there of a truly impartial trial when Bush has been announcing to the 4 winds that Saddam deserves to die for his crimes?
I understand why Bush would rather see Saddam dead... and why he would rather the trial is held in Iraq. So much dirty laundry, so many beans to spill... the last thing Bush wants is a truly impartial International War Crimes trial where Saddam will be given a full and fair chance to speak and defend himself.
it realy would not surprise me if he dies before he comes to trial.
but not until the americans have finnished with him.
i'm waiting for the headline ...SADDAM DEAD!