If you need urgent support, call 999 or go to your nearest A&E. To contact our Crisis Messenger (open 24/7) text THEMIX to 85258.
Read the community guidelines before posting ✨
What do you think about straight actors playing gay roles?
AislingDM
Moderator Posts: 1,666 Extreme Poster
I've seen a lot of different discourse and discussions about this and topics similar to this, and I just thought it would be cool to gain some different perspectives from everyone. I truly hope this does not upset anyone, if so please feel free to let me know and I can take the discussion down of course! We might have different thoughts and/or different rationales but I'd grateful to hear from anyone?
FAQ | How to report a post | How to report spam
I'm a community moderator. I'm here to help guide discussions and make sure Community Guidelines are followed. I can't send DMs, but you can message @TheMix or email community@themix.org.uk with questions or concerns.
2
Comments
https://www.vanityfair.com/hollywood/2018/12/darren-criss-gay-characters
I wanted to know what people thought, especially because I saw a cool take I hadn't thought of before, if we stopped straight actors from playing gay characters, then any closeted actor might not be able to play a role they really want without outing themselves (e.g., if they weren't ready to come out publicly/didn't want to).
Please be kind and help me to hear your opinions and such xx
As longs as gay actors are not being discriminated against, I really can't see a problem. It's called acting ffs.
@Laura_tigger82 I hear what you mean, like the advantages of allowing people to portray a range of roles allows people not to be type cast also, which should hopefully benefit gay actors, as this would ensure that they can also play straight roles (of which there are considerably more to choose from compared with gay roles). Maybe an additional relevant layer revolves around what the straight actor does for LGBT+ rights outside of work? If you're playing gay, are you actually helping us too?
@Brookee Such a fab point about weaponizing 'playing gay' to further one's career/movie buzz, I hadn't even considered this aspect, as it's certainly true that individuals can play a role well, yet if their intention is solely, or largely, rooted in improving their own status/buzz then this does not feel fair. it truly is such a complex discussion!!! xx
@Skive A very fair point!!! ultimately it does all come down to ensuring that there was not a level of discrimination that led to the straight actor gaining the role over a gay actor, but I really hope we're moving more toward this being a past issue?
@charlieboyz totally, that's a huge factor in the situation isn't it, where there are limited gay roles portrayed with a level of nuance, and so to then also give a reductive gay character to a straight actor, this merely adds insult to injury!
Thank you all for bringing your thoughts here, it's really helped me to think more about this topic !!
Yes, definitely! Either someone who identifies with being LGBTQIA+ or someone who is an advocate and has genuine interests at heart
Essentially they cast the best personality to fit the role that the writer created.
Things like sexuality of a role will only come into it if it's between two actors who are both precisely what they are after - then they'll hire the one that is the closest to identify in real life.
But it's important to remember that the whole point of acting is just that. It's playing a role that's outside of yourself. You're becoming a new person to fit a role or character. It's done all the time.
Just look at Tracy Beaker and The Dumping Ground. None of the actors grew up or spent time in care, yet they portray their characters so well that you'd think they did. You have characters portraying that their family is dead or that they were abused.
It's important not to get upset when a straight person is cast over a gay person for a gay role. This is because they will have had the best audition, and fitted best with how they wanted the role portrayed. Same if it was a gay person being cast for a straight role.
Acting is all about being different characters, there's no point playing characters that best match you in real life, because then you're blurring the lines between acting and not acting
Thanks for sharing your insights too. I have loved reading everyone's thoughts! Really interesting and valued. I think it is super important that the role is reflected the best it can be
I know when we cast at my uni theatre society we do it based on audition and who best fits the role. We don't do it based on any sort of protected characteristic so the best person for the role gets it.
I feel like that's the fairest way - just like if you were hiring for a job, you'd go for the best candidate for the job, not who belongs to a protected characteristic because everyone can work hard to get a job.
And I understand there's barriers - as a care experienced person I struggled through school, I still struggle, but I work hard and get myself where I want to be and I really believe that's something people can do. They shouldn't be blocked by discrimination, it should simply come down to who's best for the job.
Just my opinion love reading others!
Thanks for your response. I agree with @AislingDM, your points are super insightful and valuable! I have learnt so much already from you sharing your knowledge with us. Your determination and passion are so clear to see, just keep it up!
I also think, TV production teams have gotten much better over time in designing characters and storylines by getting insight from charities and social organisations to make sure they portray sensitive topics and health conditions better, which is great to see x
Oooh, you have raised a really good important! I also think TV production teams have gotten better since working with other people. I remember Eastenders as a particularly good example of this. Hope it continues
Thanks for your response. I was just going to press agree until I saw "diminish barriers which exist". I very much agree, but I wanted to add that this could be very systematic and much broader than just for the LGBTQIA+ community. If we could apply that to every course, every job, and every opportunity, the world would be a much better place!
Thanks for your response. Oh, indeed. I can only agree with how multi-faceted it is. One step at a time, and if we all play our role, we can make a huge difference!