If you need urgent support, call 999 or go to your nearest A&E. To contact our Crisis Messenger (open 24/7) text THEMIX to 85258.
Options
Take a look around and enjoy reading the discussions. If you'd like to join in, it's really easy to register and then you'll be able to post. If you'd like to learn what this place is all about, head here.
Comments
Well the biigest proof isflying the planes into the buildings. We know that happened. I mean I can't recall all the links they found and yeah mistakes made and such like but there was more to it then speculation, coz not even the American gov could get away with absolutley no proof whatsoever.
What tape recording is this? The grainy one where a fat Osama look - e - likey talks about football in arabic while an american voice over waffles on about guns and invasion? And he could admit it all day long, would you beleive him if he retracted it? What other proof do you have?
Yeah they can, and do. Hence all the conspiracy theories, because theres a vacuum o fill.
You were saying the american government arent that bad ...I was showing that they have no reguard for people, burning innocents alive .. they dont give a fuck about 'amiercans' or any other ppl, they just want to keep their backing and gain more power =p
The Pentagon Papers already exposed the modus operandi of lies and false press and the power thereof to galvanize a society sufficiently in favour of a prolonged agenda of war. For most Americans the view of what really transpires abroad in their name is sufficiently sanitised as to present no disruption to their daily perceptions of brand America's goodness.
The ideological agenda behind this new era in which we find ourselves is one of far reaching and long lasting intent, a New American Century, advanced by the exercise of American might around the globe as much as and where deemed necessary. The corporate media is fully in line with this overall move, regardless of its fickleness with regard to this or that particular actor at any point in the game.
This is about the creation of a entire paradigm of thought through which all acts will and are indeed being filtered. That requires the maintenance of a system of fear which history repeatedly demonstrates is best achieved by the creation of a foreign boogeyman.
The biggest conspiracy theory going is the one that has instilled in so many such dismissive reactionism toward any critical examination of the many gaping holes in the "terrorist" coverstory.
I don't know what one ur on about kilintock but the one I heard was clear and he made several since and several before. he is just anti west and racist. He was active lkong before Iraq.
Look, you can say america hates everyone and wanst to kil everyone as much as you want but its all meangingless without proof.
No one has said anything of the kind. Youre resorting to extreme categorisations to support your dismissal of the extensive debunking of "official claims" which has been conducted by countless researchers around the world and indeed a number of key administration whistle blowers, to date.
Given this admin's repeated stonewalling and manipulation of investigations on the matter, the critical mind would borrow a line from the talking points of the uncritical camp, "what are they hiding?".
It just sounds more conspiriacial you theory. Understaind but a conspriacy theory none the less.
And getting the media invloved?? I don't see anyone can the media has back Bush, the USA oor anything to do with whats going on. I mean Fox yes, they back Bush al the way and there was little critisim of the afghanistan conflcit, at leats for awhile., but I never saw anything that was in favour of Iraq etc in the media. In fact it was al quite anti and biased I thought.
No corporate media has undertaken any real investigative journalistic verification of claims that would challenge the prevailing paradigm of ubiquitous shadowy terrorists and the need for spreading "democracy" (aka corporate hegemony) by force or by guile. Too much advertising money would dry up if this paradigm were exposed for the fraud it was from its very conception on 911.
None but the most thick skinned independent investigative journalists have confronted the very paradigm itself and often to howls of derision and "conspiracy theorist" labels from the mainstream media and the broader complacent public.
Best you apply a little less ready acceptance of what you read or see and a little more scrutiny of how "news" is made. There is more than enough in depth analysis of the longrunning trends in this area to keep you busy for quite some time.
I still think we are in conspriacy territory here.
While the business men and editors do run the news, I still don't buy they are complete puppets of al the government leaders.
and as long as there are peopl eon the ground not in power, they will always deride those who are in power.
Go educate yoruself and dispense with the silly one line retorts. You begin to sound more and more like matadore with every post.
Or simply carry on with the silly retorts, you'll find ready acceptance amongst a few other inane posters here I'm sure.
I always knew something was rather off about the Twin Towers. Never expected so much... ah well. Just goes to show what the US Government really is like right now.
YOu take conspiracy theories as fact and gnore anything else thats put to you.
You go educate yourself. Wtach the videos again,s ee those planes?? See all those people dying a terrible death??
its disgusting how you attempt to make a tragedy into some cheap conspiracy theory all because you don't like Bush.
Can't even acknowledge the fact that you were unaware that Marvin Bush held the secuirty contracts for the WTC towers (or even that he existed), yet continue to suggest you have weighed all "the facts".
Just another silly, intellectually complacent troll with no interest in getting to the harsh truth of the matter.
Check for parting gifts on your way out.
Hello Mr Pot, have you met Mr Kettle?
They are valid questions that need to be asked.
If 19 Muslim men could kill 3000 people, and intend to kill more, then why couldn't a President with a long and delicious history of murdering people do it too?
Mr Bush has happily killed tens of thousands of Iraqis and Afghans, why not a few expendable Yanks too? Because they're American?
I personally don't believe the guff about controlled explosions, but those planes were hijacked remarkably easily. I wouldn't at all be surprised to see the CIA acting as agents provoacteur.
as have been proved by myself and others on here.
You said they can't fly? They had flying lessoons, they could fly, they planned it and carried it out, they did it. It happened. Now your just reaching. Its not like they were easy targets to miss. They are dounbts over the named hijakers yes, butit happened.
You still can't give a mtoive for why anyone else would do ithis. Any alternative motive has been explained away long before you came on here.
The only one with their head int he sand is you.
Go and tel your little theory to the family's of the ivtims, see what they say. Go tell it to experts in the field. Watch them laugh.
I know the truth about plenty of things. I just don't belive what every sucker tells me.