If you need urgent support, call 999 or go to your nearest A&E. To contact our Crisis Messenger (open 24/7) text THEMIX to 85258.
Options
New 9/11 video worth watching
Former Member
Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
If you were a fence-sitter in regards to whether or not WTC buildings 1, 2 and 7 were brought down by controlled demolition before, you won't be after you watch this video from 911EyeWitness, by Rick Siegel.
This video includes multiple explosions recorded on video from directly across the river just before the collapses of WTC1 and WTC2 AND just before the collapse of WTC Building 7. It also includes news broadcasts recorded live and unedited on the day as the events were occurring - reports of explosions at the bases of the buildings, a FEMA official admitting on tape that FEMA arrived to deal with the disaster ON SEPTEMBER 10TH, a military helicopter close to the explosion at the Pentagon, and more.
*the video is being sold commercially - you can't link to a pirate here*
This video includes multiple explosions recorded on video from directly across the river just before the collapses of WTC1 and WTC2 AND just before the collapse of WTC Building 7. It also includes news broadcasts recorded live and unedited on the day as the events were occurring - reports of explosions at the bases of the buildings, a FEMA official admitting on tape that FEMA arrived to deal with the disaster ON SEPTEMBER 10TH, a military helicopter close to the explosion at the Pentagon, and more.
*the video is being sold commercially - you can't link to a pirate here*
0
Comments
He wasn't talking about your comment.
And PS ... So why would they cover it up or get the media to believe otherwise? I havent watched the video just wondering?
It wasn't aimed at you. It was aimed at the OP.
This video has never been shown before and you see things you can't on other videos because of the camera angle.
You can quite clearly hear bangs and then see smoke rise up the side of the south tower and see half a dozen black choppers fly into the smoke, one of which flys right close to the building and has a couple bright flashes come from it and at that point the first tower falls.
Did they know about the plane attacks then? and did they think ppl wouldnt see black heli's flying around lol :S :S.
Video's can be doctored...but i wont properly comment on it till i can watch it =P
No it's not a conspiracy so the US gov could justify starting all the wars in Asia. And yes video can be edited to make you think otherwise but you should seriously watch it it, it's quite shocking what it actually exposes about controlled explosions and that day.
in their own words when reagan was top dog ...'we need another pearl harbour ...'
why?
so they could invade afghanistan and iraq.
all documented.
it's so shocking that most people will never be able to grasp it ...exactly what ythey were banking on.
the truth shall come out ...
I guess us Americans are all horrible terrorist information supressing assholes. God forbid I live here, huh. I flew the helicopeters into the buliding. Or did I forge the footage of it. You'll never know.
The only question of the event sof that day is whether the flight that when down in Philedelpia (?) was brought down by passengers or shot down.
*geek*
like the biggest crime scene in history ...no forensics allowed on the steelwork.
all the evidence shipped out to china as fast as possible.
it is just to shocking for people to accept the evidence which i realy can't be arsed going through for the enth time.
truth will out.
Welll, no.
Not going to get my tinfoil hat out just yet of course, but loads of discrepancies have been found. The fact that both buildings fell straight down onto their own footprint is a bit of a puzzle to most architects for a start. That all the steel that was supposed to be checked for explosive damage was melted down and shipped to africa asap is a bit suspect as well.
It wouldn't be the first time a government had attacked it's own people as an excuse to gain more power either. For the violent sociopaths who run the state it's not so unusual to kill a few thousand of it's own expendables to get it's own way.
The 911 commission itself was a whitewash, as these things usually are.
Talk to the guys that built and desgned the buildings.
They were made to fall straight down, not topple over. Hence a partial reason why the world trade center bombings failed. Also afterthat they werereinfoced and overahauled but it was not enough to take a 747 (?) crashing into the top. Just having taken off and so laden with fuel, this multi ton plane smashed straightinot tons of steel and glass and other meatls. Why did the buildings not go down straight away? Becasue they wouldnt. not straight away, but whne you have that intensie heat it causes alot of melting and that builds weight and so that builds up until it reaches the point of collapse, which it did.
I knwo they tried blocking some areas of investigations but I thought they carried it out in the end? Any tiar crash investigators looke dat it, quite a few independants to and they concluded the same.
only conspiracy nuts and america haters are saying owt different.
I know conspiracies exist, belive a few of them myself but not this one. The secreting of the bibn ladens out of america I will give you but the crash itself is straight forward.
anyone care to write a long list?
illegal wars torture as well to top off the endless stream of lies ...yet people still trust them on this?
eactly what?? A lie. Its been investgated several times by various sources. Nothing suspecious excpet for the filght over phildeliphia as I already said.
Even airline fuel isn't hot tnough to melt the steel that was used to build the WTC buildings. The fuel was at it's hottest just after impact, whereafter it would reduce in ferocity. If the steel was weakened, then you would get a sideways fall over anyway. It's not difficult to work out.
thanks.
believe what you want to but don't dismiss anyone who doubts the official story as a conspiracy nut or an america-hater.
Subscribe to the official coverstory of womanizing, booze-guzzling supposed "fundamentalist" suicide attackers - of whom none could so much as fly a piper cub (according to sworn affidavits of their flight instructors) - who were amazingly named as the "known" perpetrators a mere 72 hours after the attacks without any formal investigation (as noted above by other posters), and it's somehow not a "conspiracy theory".
Amazing how effective the "big lie" truly is in ordering the collective mind, as suggested by leaders past, so long as it is repeated widely and often enough.
Dismissal of the facts is not disproval.