If you need urgent support, call 999 or go to your nearest A&E. To contact our Crisis Messenger (open 24/7) text THEMIX to 85258.
Options
Take a look around and enjoy reading the discussions. If you'd like to join in, it's really easy to register and then you'll be able to post. If you'd like to learn what this place is all about, head here.
Comments
Words mean whatever I want them to mean, no more, no less. - Humpty Dumpty.
Let's define ownership then, to crack off. How do you think ownership works?
This is why I had you on ignore for so long - you change defintions of words to suit your argument thus making it impossible to actually debate.
Stuck in after the Op?
So let's define a few words then.
Seriously, how do you think you come to "own" something?
No, I'm not expecting everyone to agree. If that were going to happen, it would have happened centuries ago.
Just don't know whether it's a case of weigh up the pros and cons before you act or whether that just takes too long?
Not always but sometimes I yearn to get back to nature, though civilisation is pretty irreversible now. It's a pretty ruthless world but you don't have many worries.
before the beats even had their first recording contract ...before the uk had even heard of the beatles ...they played endless gigs in hamburg ...full of speed ...so at which point were they wonderful in your book ...and then drugs destroyed them?
Incidentally MR, every time I watch the (excellent) new Guinness ad I think of you. I picture you watching the 'reversed evolution' footage and shouting "Lies, all lies!" as you throw a shoe at the TV.
the later stuff changed the face of music.
first band to use loops and samples ...all on little bits of tape.
lots of synth.
lots of classical instruments ...breaking most of the rules and expectations of what pop music was supposed to be about.
when you listen to the white album you her country hillbilly punk rock 1920's showbiz stuff ...little stories ...no band at the time could come up with that kind of variety.
i'm not a big fan myself and never was but ...no getting away from what they and george martin achieved in changing the face of pop music.
it's a matter of taste i suppose but to say drugs destroyed their music and or talents flys in the face of the evidence.
you like the stuff they did uder the influence of a very destructive and dangerous drug ...but not the stuff they did undr the influence of less harmful stufg.
http://www.visit4info.com/details.cfm?adid=26233
i used my muddy boots!