If you need urgent support, call 999 or go to your nearest A&E. To contact our Crisis Messenger (open 24/7) text THEMIX to 85258.
Options
wheres the plane?
Former Member
Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
in General Chat
0
Comments
There would be nothing left with all the fuel onboard, it would literally vapourize!
''The approach of a 757 towards this building leave a lot of questions unanswered (realism of the approach trajectory, position of the impact point, no track of the landing gear (which gets down automatically near the ground) on the grass, ...).''
landing gear is selected by the pilot himself not automatically, truely shows these people are clueless
On those frame by frame pictures the reason you can't make out an aircraft is because of it's speed, it was travelling very fast which of course makes the likelyhood of the aircraft disintergrating into dust
These sorts of websites are a disgrace, total disrespect to the lives that were lost.
there is a hole that goes through five rinforced buildings!
the plane is said to have vapourised but ...the government recovbered the dna of all the passengers!
the damage is only 2 1/2 yards wide ...read what the experts have to say.
try this for size.http://www.alltheweb.com/search?cat=web&lang=any&query=Flight+77+photo&phrase=on
Aircraft arn't made of steel, 90% are lightweight materials such as carbon fibre which are strong but will dissintergrate.
If something is doing 500mph then my bet is it will go through 5 reinforced buildings!
thats how these people get away with such atrocities.
it's too unbelievable!
see the lawn?
see the fact that these planes cn't fly at those spedds when near the ground without coming apart.
you carry on being safe in your blindness.
Excuse me i am keen on aviation and i can tell you that aircraft can fly fast and low without coming apart!
Please tell me why an aircraft at 30,000ft doing 500 mph is any different than an aircraft at 100ft doing 500 mph?
goodnight god bless.
http://www.airliners.net/discussions/general_aviation/read.main/1731362/
http://www.airliners.net/discussions/general_aviation/read.main/1790119/
Some of these guys are airline pilots and mx
And MorrocanRoll if you think aircraft come apart when flying low level at high speed you are clueless...
i must say, i have to agree.
plus, you can never believe anything bush and his sodding government tell you anyway :yeees:
or Tony Blair and our government for that matter
actually, just don't trust anyone in a position of authority :thumb: :no:
i seriously think sometimes that the concept of time is alien to rolly
this would have to be the first plane in history to have impacted like this ..and leaving the lawn spotless ..
it's election time again ...thats one of the reasons i posted all this stuff ...to remind people what the yanks have fallen for.
especialy lukesh ...but no matter how much evidence is given them ...no matter how many times ...well you can see lukes reply in the politics forum.
Have you actually read the links i posted, respectable commercial pilots and mechanics who fly these aircraft for real!
The whole could be cause by many things, i'm sure when something as big as a 757 crashes at high speed you will have holes lol, maybe there were gas works which exploded?
Actually, not in fact, heating steel so that it's soft, is not terribly difficult, vapourising aluminium is a lot harder.
1510 °C - melting point of steel
2519 °C - Boiling point of aluminium
Bear in mind what there was available to burn, and how long you'd have to burn a fire to vapourise and entire plane, and yet still be able to find DNA.
So something doing 500mph+ has time to break into three sections when hitting a solid wall!
When you look at the WTC towers when the aircraft hit what do you see? Do you see the aircraft?
Have you read my links?
What's the mass? 300 tons? k, give me a bit to find the equation and I'll edit this post to get back to you with the momentum.
ETA: I've read that the speed of impact was 300mph though. I'll get both.
ETA first result: Right, so 300 tons at 300mph has a momentum of 4.02x10^8kgm/s
ETA second result: 300 tons at 500mph has a momentum of 6.70x10^8kgm/s
It's up to you whether you think that this momentum is sufficient to punch cleanly through steel reinforced concrete
Around about 120T,
so what are you trying to say? a 757 actually crashed into the pentagon?
No, I'm answering the fucking question.
What is the argument here? That the tips of the fuel-filled wings did not make a hole whilst the huge belly of the aircraft did? Hmmm. I wonder why
You see the big whole and also some of the wings shape, but of course if that were not glass and instead re-inforced concrete, there would be no wing shape, only a hole from the fuselage itself
So basically it's one helluva force.
The walls of the Pentagon were reinforced (i.e. very strong), which suggests to me that they would be less inclined to crumble and more likely have a clean hole punched through.
As for what happened to the wings, that's another story...
Silly americans
Whats not to get?