If you need urgent support, call 999 or go to your nearest A&E. To contact our Crisis Messenger (open 24/7) text THEMIX to 85258.
Read the community guidelines before posting ✨
Options
Essential support for under 25s
Essential support for under 25s
Take a look around and enjoy reading the discussions. If you'd like to join in, it's really easy to register and then you'll be able to post. If you'd like to learn what this place is all about, head here.
Comments
What happened to flight 77?
Who blew up the Pentagon, and why?
Same questions to number 2.
Why couldn't it have been travelling at very high speed? Why must it have hit the ground?
That 747 went straight through those flats no?
The only part of an aircraft which contain steel are the engines, when travelling at speed these go through anything, just like at the WTC, the engines didn't stay inside the building, they came through the otherside and onto the street.
Because of where the hole is plank.
the creation of the new american century needed a new pearl harbour ...the words of top military and government personell in reagans days.
when reagan was boss it was discussed at the highest levels about american inteligence and military using terrorist tactics against the american population ...blaming the russians ...the only reason it didn't go ahead was because of nancy reagan being outraged.
nancy is seriously right wing and is campaigning to get dubya out of office and get kerry in.
remember before 911 ...the worst terrorist atrocity on american soil was the oklahoma bombing. the yanks had proof beyond proof it was libya so steamed in with bombs and missiles ...it turned out to be one of the same kinds of white american christians as dubya and chrlton heston...mcviegh.
they tried everything to stop it going public but failed.
Maybe it's pointless talking about, we are all individuals and are valid to our own oppinions, I only stress the evidence i see before me and what i believe to be right, you have your own ideas so fair play!
It has been very 'convenient' for them to have an emotive justification for their empire building, but I can't believe Bush was involved.
Again watch this
And remarkably unmarked
I don't care if it looks like AA or not. It doesn't have a scratches on it.
Fiend, the picture i posted of the block of flats, does that look acceptable to you that a 747 crashed into them?
There was a debate over this subject on airliners.net awhile ago, the links are on the first page of thise thread, go and read it yourselves, some of those guys are airline pilots and mx, they have alot more knowledge of this matter than most of us, so go and read it, all of it and see what you think..
Here they are again:
http://www.airliners.net/discussions/general_aviation/read.main/1731362/
But you didn't see any video evidence of a 757 going into the Pentagon so the idea must be totally ludacris!
The link i supplied earlier showed that the heat of the fuel burning for a period of time would weakin the buildings structural integrity, thus causing the floors to collapse on top of one another...