If you need urgent support, call 999 or go to your nearest A&E. To contact our Crisis Messenger (open 24/7) text THEMIX to 85258.
Options
Take a look around and enjoy reading the discussions. If you'd like to join in, it's really easy to register and then you'll be able to post. If you'd like to learn what this place is all about, head here.
Comments
Illegal possesion of firearms is probably commoner in rural areas then in urban
And that would be a good defence to be taken into account during sentencing especially- but the force used has to be in proportion to the threat posed.
Say the boy had started running toward Martin, not away- even if the boy had been unarmed, Martin could have used self-defence as a reason and he would have been acquitted. You would also be perfectly entitled to chase after the intruder, and capture him with enough force to ensure he remained captured- citizen's arrests are legal, so long as that you are CERTAIN he was intruding (in a quirk of law, if you perform a citizen's arrest but the person turns out to be innocent, he can sue for false imprisonment).
Martin was convicted of manslaughter and not murder because of his defence of not being of completely sound mind- the fact that he claimed fear meant that that was sufficient to fail the mens rea for murder, but not constructive manslaughter. I think that was a bit dubious, to say the least, though.
Huh?
Because the media mocks people who worship Satan it means that they go off and set fire to cats? How does that work, exactly?
And that's okay is it?
Why do I get the distinct impression that it is okay to break the law, provided that you are a darling of the right-wing?
Tony Martin broke the law before the burglary, and if revenct press stories are to be believed he has broken the law since. The man is a criminal, so let's not hold him up as some kind of demi-god.