If you need urgent support, call 999 or go to your nearest A&E. To contact our Crisis Messenger (open 24/7) text THEMIX to 85258.
Read the community guidelines before posting ✨
Options
Take a look around and enjoy reading the discussions. If you'd like to join in, it's really easy to register and then you'll be able to post. If you'd like to learn what this place is all about, head here.
Comments
You claimed that subspecies and race are not the same terms - I disagree.
If you read the pdf it describes various subspecies of crossbill that occur throught the Palearctic, the debate is whether the Scottish one is a separate species.
The point is subspecies is another term for race,simple as that.
No mate, the real world, you know, the one that will still be here after we have all died or evolved into something else. They are different things you see. Even a 6 year old can comprehend that.
You also show a breathtaking ignorance of how people work. It's similarity that makes people come together and is the primary social factor.
If none had told you about the differences you probably wouldn't mention them - like the green eyes example. Groups get defined by the most persuasive, who use the distinctions they can get you to buy into for there own ends. Hitler springs to mind.
No? Why would he? Most people get what I mean straight away, i on;y have trouble with political types, who generally have invested a lot of effort and emotion into these ideas and find it difficult to shift them.
When I give up my £75 an hour job hypnotising people then I might give it a go. And here again, you show your idiocy. If a wandering tramp comes up to you and says, oh, for example, "E=MC2" and explains the theory of relativity, he'll either be right or wrong in what he says, regardless of his social status. Stuff is either true or false.
What are your criteria and who chose them? Oh, forget it, it'll be just some guy, just his opinion of how to pretend the world is divided up.
Those white people that you no doubt label and condemn as "racists" despite the fact that such word neednt exist according to your own logic.
Race does not exist. Race is not a subspecies.
I'd also compare and contrast the murder of a 17-year-old skinny white blonde girl, and the murder of a 17-year-old black girl just a few months ago. Which one got the bigger publicity?
You are a joke.
But then again this is no longer a joke is it, as we have seen today in London as the Black and Asian communities "embraced" on a red bus in our rainbow nation to stab and kill each other.
The Emporer has no clothes, when will you see it?
You cannot continue this colossal denial syndrome you suffer from.
And you have limited grasp of English. Funny for someone who thinks white people are superior.
I'm not sure what's funnier. Your pathetic attempts to be the intelligent face of Stormfront, or you calling me Marxist.
Racism exists. Race does not as anything other than a fabricated social construct.
You can tell the difference between an African and European by looking at their skeletons actually.
The real world is one of Darwinian struggle - indviduals and groups (species/subspecies) in an endless competition for life. I'm sure a 6 year old's view of the world is cosy little place where mum and dad can sort everthing out for them, but it's not really the point.
The Disney Channel philosophy show told you that did it?
Political types parrot your type of gibberish at every opportunity these days, St. Blair himself would be proud of you. Quasi Marksism is the new religion of the ruling elites.
Yes something we can agree on, as you put it 'stuff is either true or fale'
See above
really? an african eh, what about a souther african farmer and a southern spanish person?
you can have a good guess at the ethnically distinct area in the world a persons body is from - but you can't be certain. It's like CSI on tv, most of the things they use to "prove" a persons guilt is purely circumstancial and not 100% as they claim
what about a mixed race person?
seriously, you're right but in many ways its' useless
in regards to race etc, theres less genetic difference between an aborigine and a icelandic person than there is between 2 groups of chimps 50 miles apart, and even then they're not genetically distinct. If you had 2 stereotypical 'scandanavians', and say 2 stereotypical 'africans' - purely from their genetic codes you'd find no dicernable differences
There are no groups. Nitwit. 6 year old's beleive everything an authority will tell them, time to grow up for you, innit. Regardless, let's go back to that old standby - proof of your ridiciculous assertions please.
Good lord no. It's my job to gain rapport with people one on one and then to use that to help them change. It's not possible to do this by being completely alien to them. You can only do it by finding common ground and going from there.
Oh yes, police chiefs are always saying that there is no factual basis for the violence they routinely employ. You find no end of coppers who stand up in court and say there is no basis for the jurisdiction they are trying you under. Jesus. I despise all politicians, and almost all political theory because I don't like things that aren't real.
Ok, show me the facts that your ludicrous opinions are based on.
We've had 'mass immigration' for a good few hundred years actually, and it has made Britain one of the World powers.
And, if there are distinct races, can you give us a definition please?
They'll all be in jail soon anyway :yippe:
not really the police are too busy going after terroists :O and binge drinkers :O and people who dont like the daily mail and the sun :O
I’m sure we can all agree that the media will report things that make a “good story” and are sensationalist, rather than purely focusing on what’s important or the truth.
So of course a pretty blond English girl being murdered is a better selling story than a poor black immigrant being murdered, so right there is racial bias in the media.
Like wise the Asian tsunami received more attention that the Pakistan earthquake cause white tourists were caught up in it (like the actor from the Bill’s daughter)
Also a pretty 18yr old girl from a “good middle class home” dying of a drug overdose attracts more media attention than a 30 yr old man with previous convictions dying from a drug overdose, so we have a class bias and a looks bias, a racial bias and most importantly an “interesting story” bias in the media.
Also the media is sensitive to criticism and will sit on or burry a story if they feel that it would attract unwanted criticism from different quarters, i.e. the criticism that their stoking up racial hatred.
Which is why with the recent riots in Birmingham the race of some of the people injured (the guy killed) wasn’t mentioned to avoid stoking up racial tension or more importantly the accusation of stoking up racial tension.
So most people would admit the media was bias in all these areas and cynically exploits the news for its own sensationalist aims whilst at the same time is anxious not to be criticised for its news agenda.
So the only area the medias not biased is with racial murders that’s the only area they have unbiased factual reporting with out regard for criticism with out regard for sensationalism and with out regard for a good story, I beg to differ I think their just as biased as to what suites their agenda with these types of story’s.
No.
I pity them. They see fields where I see blades of grass, all different colours.
I always get tempted to go for hysterical blindness with racists. Not ethical, though. Interestingly, there are rumours that Hitler was treated with hypnosis for that very problem. The idiot hypnotist saw how arogant he was and used that belief to get him to stop pretending he was blind. "Only a man of great superiority could overcome this illness". Should have left the fucker alone.
http://www.positiveatheism.org/writ/hitlernuz.htm
I think you'll find class had far more to do with the events in New Orleans. Race is only an issue 'cos racist cowards like you make it so and people in power exploit attitudes like yours to divide people.
Except it isn't of course. Only idiots and first year students subscribe to such a simplistic and reductionist view of evolution.
Darwin - Origin of the Species
Try and read you might learn something.
Hypnotist, is that another word for charlatan?
If you, as you have stated, see no diference between life forms ' it's all one ' then how can I debate with you about the reality of race and species ?
Word of advice though, if you're on holiday in Africa and you spot a Lion I suggest you don't try to pat it on the head as you would with a old tabby cat, you might be surprised by it's reaction.
Except ' idiots ' such as Jones and Dawkins accept Darwins theory.
11 000 posts ?
Word of advice, spend some time getting yourself a proper education, read some actual books and take a trip outside ( without a car) never know your I.Q. might increase a couple of points.
You're a first year aren't you? (if indeed, you are at uni at all)
I have a copy. Quick question for you, oh mighty biologist. If I have a glass of whiskey and a glass of water and I mix them, I have weaker whiskey. Why does evolution say that you get stronger whiskey?
Yes, it is. :yes:
No, I see no similarities. I see total difference. You are as different from me as I am from my brother as he is to my sister etc etc. Similarity is just the brain making useful sense out of the world. It's not true, and it's not real. It's a fault of perception.
Each new person is a new person and you have to start all over again learning about them. Too much effort for you obviously.
See you see things as part of the class "lion" I would see an individual creature, based on it's difference to eveerything else. The big claws and teeth would be enough to make me wary.
Well, he started it.
because darwin had a very narrow view of evolution, the fact is in nature, as well as competition between species, some species enter into symbiotic relationships as well as parasitic ones
a good theorised example is mitochondria in cells
Edited wrong thing thats why I have a fulll stop.
But yea stormfronters will say "it's not class, blacks are naturall violent and dumb" :banghead:
Yep, anti - racists agrue about something they claim doesn't exist, they miss the point every time. In the biggest cause of ' racism ' is the establisment's multi - cult social engineering experiment.
It all going Darwinian at the moment, and no amout of media dirty tricks will change a thing.