If you need urgent support, call 999 or go to your nearest A&E. To contact our Crisis Messenger (open 24/7) text THEMIX to 85258.
Read the community guidelines before posting ✨
Options
Essential support for under 25s
Essential support for under 25s
Take a look around and enjoy reading the discussions. If you'd like to join in, it's really easy to register and then you'll be able to post. If you'd like to learn what this place is all about, head here.
Comments
- Don't think of it as offensive and simply use it as a word. In which case they are not racist, they are simply politically incorrect.
- Feel that white people are superior. (Superior at what exactly?). That would be racist.
- Feel that Europe / England belongs to the whites and that the blacks belong in Africa. That would be fascist.
- Feel that Europe effectively belongs to the whites and Africa / The Caribbean to the blacks but that black people may live here as foreigners or at least are sort-of foreign (and white people similarly in Africa). That would also be fascist, in a slightly milder way.
Just because they don't know what fascism is, doesn't mean they can't be fascist.
No, that is not fascism. What you're talking about is racial separatism. Fascism is something else.
happened in my area but really its a sad excuse for violence in msot cases
Well true, but what you described wasn't fascism.
But Italy was a democracy before Mussolini came to power, so to suggest that Mussolini was part of 'rather boring, painless evolution towards "democracy"...' is a bit innaccurate.
Do you even know what fascism is?
Yes and suggesting that Franco's regime was "painless" is a bit...errmmm...misguided to say the least.
"a thriving, inclusive and advanced social democracy changed into a third world bloody dictatorship by a fascist religious fundamentalist racist cunt who caused the deaths of up to a million of his own people and plunged the country into decades of darkness."
Spain was already a democracy before the cunt decided the people could not be given such liberties.
Try to read a little history eh?
The Bolshevik forces were responsible for the worst atrocities that have ever taken place in Europe in its history, all historians accept this, it is not even a debating point, and in Red Spain Priests were being mass Murdered, nailed to the doors of their churches as they had been in Russia and Hungary some years earlier, this kind of thing is one of the biggest reasons that the ranks of the blackshirts, the fallange and the NSDAP swelled into the millions as they did, not because they were all inherently evil but because they were fighting against the ever rising tide of Bolshevism, a force which they saw quite as the greatest threat to their lives, and of course Bolshevism was also the source of a rising tide of Anti-Semetism as people began to join the dots together with the faces of the international Bolshevik leadership.
If you say so. The old conspiracy thing...
Stalin was a well-known Anti-Semetic. He was nearly as bad as Hitler.
Then again, it has already being said you don't know the facts.
Why do you think Orwell wrote animal farm and fell out with the British lunatic left? It was down to his experience with the reds in Spain, Orwell saw the light thanks to his short encounter with those "democrats" as you call the international Bolshevik horde of 1930's Spain.
Or better, take your fascist-loving revitionist propaganda elsewhere.
You knew damn well Stalin has nothing to do with any of this,
And you also no doubt purposefully failed to ignore the fact that Stalin was married to a Jewess and most of his most loyal "subjects" in the Kremlin were also Jewish (i can provide a list of names if need be as im sure you know), Stalin basically hated everyone regardless of race, he was a "non-prejudicial" madman.
However i will state now and i will back up with the most impeccible sources, that range from Winston Churchill, American senate archives to British secret service intelligence reports, that the Russian revolution was not "Russian" at all. It was financed in New York and it was led almost entirely by "Non-Russians", this subject is the greatest historical cover up of all time. And i think a few of you know it dont you?
Ok provide these, I really am intrigued.
Just try to think before you post.
And please, don't use white power websites again to provide a source.
So tell me buddy, what's the shape of Italy?
Churchill wrote an article that appeared in the illustrated sunday Herald, Feb 8th 1920 titled "Zionism versus Bolshevism: A struggle for the soul of the Jewish people". in it he says,
There is no need to exaggarate the part played in the creation of bolshevism and in the acyual bringing about of the Russian revolution by these international and for the most part Atheistical Jews.."
Ariticle in full - ajedrez_democratico.tripod.com/Zionism-versus-Bolshevism.htm
- this backs up an American army intelligence report from Russia during the revolution in which Captain Schuyler stated
"It is probably unwise to say this loudly in the United States, but the Bolshevik movement is and has been since its beginning, guided and controlled by russian Jews of the [...]type"
and it also backs up the Director of British intelligence in 1918 when he stated to the US secretary in a report that
"There is now definite evidence that Bolshevism is an international movement controlled by Jews"
The American ambassador to Moscow, David francis stated in a 1918 cable to the US government that "The Bolshevik leaders here, most of whom are Jews and 90 per cent of whom are returned exiles, care little for Russia or any other country but are internationalists and they are trying to start a world wide social revolution"
All official documents still in existence today!
So, I suggest you also fail to notice Stalin's comment on Jews as "Theives", the Jewish Anti-Facist council incident, and seemingly sytematic sending of Jews to forced labour camps. As well as the evidence that another Holocuast was only prevented because Stlain died. He had plans to erreadicate Jews from existence in Russia.
The fact Capitalists have Financed Communism doesn't supprise me. Alot of them would seem to be funding Islamic Terrorism, evidence has suggested! The whole world is mad, haha. I don't see HOW it could be in their interests to do either, unless eitherp laying the "Threat makes our power base stronger" game, or they actually bleevie in the cause.