If you need urgent support, call 999 or go to your nearest A&E. To contact our Crisis Messenger (open 24/7) text THEMIX to 85258.
Read the community guidelines before posting ✨
Options
Dog dies after being raped by teenager.
Former Member
Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
0
Comments
Only in the good ol USofA huh?
There is a fetish for this weird shit, just don't know how anyone could shag a dog! They obviously need some mental help.
What a sick bastard.
fake an orgasm quick.
That's what everyone says until it happens in their own country.
The sort of thing one expects of tabloid level journalism.
http://www.realtruthmag.org/articles/july-cyttn.html
Hmmmm...interesting source site that. Can't you find a better one?
i doubt as to whether it's made up, but like what you write, they may have ran it to bury something.
The porn industry has just /about to, been given there own domain on the www. Which would end in xxx. Most young adults, will learn about sex off the net by looking at graphic hard core material which includes - beastality, rapes etc etc etc
http://www.projectcensored.org/
Don't want to read it, fine don't. Don't like the name of the mag, take it up with their editors. Otherwise go ahead and show us your detailed refutation of the points contained in the expose or leave off.
I couldn't care less what YOU wish to believe quite frankly.
... and let's look behind that site shall we...
Here
Nope, no agenda there then...
Which censors what it produces... by the site's own admission they look at 1000 stories but only detail 25...
But of course so long as you see "NY Times" or some other well known brand name source, IT couldnt possibly have an agenda, eh?
Lame indeed.
I may not agree with their theological perpsectives or even some of their conclusions but the citations of journalistic duplicity are a good starting point for sensitising oneself to what is likely false news like the original piece in this thread.
John, thats another excellent site for more prolonged investigation as is tvnewslies.org
Actually, that was kind of my point. You can't.
Which is why your claim that this article is any more legitimate than others is weak. Just because you believe something to be true, doesn't mean it is. Obviously the same applies for me.
It's what we refer to an "opinions"...
Anyone who thinks that something like this would happen "only in the US", needs to visit a vet and/or A&E unit...
However to be less fair - you'd think that an article trying to expose media failures would at least get its examples right.
The Royal Navy didn't remove it. The crew decided to tune the televisions to Sky. And this wasn't because they felt the BBC were anti-war (though they may have been), but because it was felt that the BBC implied that the loss of two RN helicopters may have been due to mistakes made by Ark Royal's crew.
Hi Clan, thanxs for the compliament, i also use;
...www.medialens.org - 24k -
...www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk
Have a great evening all :wave:
The internet doubly so. And the potential market for the latter is much, much higher.
The "joy" of the internet is that any idiot with too much time on their hands can promote their agenda. Another idiot will read it and believe it to be gospel.
I totally agree, and have personal experience.
I don't disagree with something you said a long time ago about the lack of investigative journalism. Both to cover the Govt and the conspiracists...
just like the people 2000 years ago who wrote a book and the idiots who believe it today
well said Tourlough :yippe:
Religions were only made up by puritanical twonks who wanted to impose their cr'p ideaology onto us bytelling us how to think, what to eat, and who to have sex with etc etc etc
Shoot the effing lot, W@nkers the lot ov 'em! :yes:
That struck me too, tbh. Odd that.
nah, it's eminem who's to blame now isn't it?