If you need urgent support, call 999 or go to your nearest A&E. To contact our Crisis Messenger (open 24/7) text THEMIX to 85258.
Read the community guidelines before posting ✨
Aged 16-25? Share your experience of using the discussion boards and receive a £25 voucher! Take part via text-chat, video or phone. Click here to find out more and to take part.
Options
Comments
Read the whole thread little lady.
big_man_with_a_: You can't just say somehting is shit, it's not a valid argument. It just makes you seem ignorant.
Am I the only one that think that song title just looks wrong.
ok then. poorly written soft rock songs for drunk people to shout along with.
which i don't happen to think is 'talent'.
better?
So who ARE the good bands then? You seem to know your stuff.
definitely maybe is not in the top 43 all time best-selling albums
unlucky.
but, "Spice" - The Spice Girls, "Robson And Jerome" - Robson & Jerome , "Sound Of Music" - Soundtrack, "Falling Into You" - Celine Dion, and the god-forsaken "Now That's What I Call Music 44" - Various are.
popularity has fuck all to do with talent.
you can't say something is good just because you like it.
of course no one can because not every has the same taste in music but you can't deny that oasis are a very talented band musically and lyrically, respect that at least.
orry, did I say popularity had fuck all to do with talent? Oasis ain't been about for the last 10 years because their crap have they?
VH1: 100 Best Songs of the Past 25 Years includes "Wonderwall"
Rolling Stone: The 500 Greatest Albums of All Time: # 376: (What's The Story) Morning Glory.
They also got nominated for a Grammy Award, 4 BRAT Awards & 6 BRIT Award. You don't get an album in the top 500 best ever albums for being talentless or having an album that went 6 times Platinum for being talentless.
real props should go to the album producers/techs.
and the beatles.
So people don't like Oasis. No, some people don't respect the Gallaghers. No, some people don't like the lyrics. No, some people don't think they are the best British band since the Beatles. No, some people don't think they are the best musicians of the past ten years.
No facts and figures can change this.
No, I hate Oasis. I hate their voices, they sound like 80 a day chav smokers.
Blur are alright though.
Being popular these days is no real sign of quality. A recent number one for example sounds like this
Call on me
Call on me
Call on me
Call on me
Call on me
Call on me
Call on me
Call on me
Call on me
Call on me
Call on me
Call on me
Call on me
Call on me
Call on me
Call on me
Call on me
Call on me
:chin:
I though you said their lryics are shit?
he can write songs. they're ok songs, but they in no way deserve the kind of praise you're bestowing on them. ok, yes, they rhyme, but that doesn't equal amazing lyrics in my book. i'm a writer, i have high standards.
Stop contradicting your self. You say their shit now their songs are ok, make up your mind. Spose that's a bit to much to ask of a woman.
You look at what Lennon and McCartney have written, then look at what Noel has done, their isn't much difference in them.
Why are they not talented? To sell 18 million albums, you got to have some sort of talent.
For anyone who thinks differently......stick on definitely maybe or masterplan and really listen
Clearly you like Oasis and I don't want to start a tit for tat slanging much over them. I do think it's quite shitty to insult other people's taste in music so I'm not going to.
However, Noel is nothing like Lennon, McCartney or George Harrison. They invented the chord changes that everyone uses today. Substituting chords, harmonising, expanding the three chord trick, they took songwriting to genius level. Noel hasn't
Bands like Dream Theater, Symphony X, Planet X etc are the most talented bands going today. They barely sell over 50,000 copies of their albums. Selling lots of albums is not an indicator of musical talent.
no, read it more carefully. i said oasis were shite. and they are. then i said noel gallager as a songwriter is ok. and he is. entirely different things. but then as a man, i guess you've been too busy hunting animals and beating your hands agains your chest to learn to read. oh my, these gender stereotypes.
1. exactly. utterly groundbreaking.
2. where did i say i thought the beatles were good?
I don't understand the hatred of Oasis, but then that is just musical taste. I know kaff loves Ani DiFranco, but I've never seen what all the fuss is about.
I really hate this attitude. If people don't like something, it's not because they are ignorant, or not listening properly. It's because they don't like it.
No, quite.
But most people will see Oasis as shite if they only listen to Shoulders and Be Here Now.
i've listened to all of it. my brother was a fan, back in the day, much to my continual annoyance. liam's voice actually makes me cringe. physically cringe. same with some of the rhymes in the lyrics.
and musical taste and talent are seperate too. i quite like mcfly, but i wouldn't say for a minute they are talented. and then there are some people who i think are brilliant, but i don't really like their music.
her music is not for everyone, admittedly. but she is a brilliant writer, and her lyrics shit all over noel gallagher's.
i grit my teeth reading that, there lyrics and guitar work and out of this world in my opinion... everything about the way they are and there music is fan bloody tastic. cant really go wrong with inspiration from the stone roses and the beatles
fair play, but in a interview, noel said, standing on the shoulders of giant, be here now are both fucking shit. definatley maybe, the masterplan and what the story are all legendary, money cant pay for the entertainment they have brought me