If you need urgent support, call 999 or go to your nearest A&E. To contact our Crisis Messenger (open 24/7) text THEMIX to 85258.
Read the community guidelines before posting ✨
Options
Essential support for under 25s
Essential support for under 25s
Take a look around and enjoy reading the discussions. If you'd like to join in, it's really easy to register and then you'll be able to post. If you'd like to learn what this place is all about, head here.
Comments
Whoa! What a revelation! :eek:
Though it actually could be discussed how bad he was, i.e. Post Hitler.
Hilter then joined the army and fought and was injured in World War 1, he got a medal for this and he came back to Germany with a taste for politics and started to work for the government and was sent to Bavaria(i think) to check out a party that was causing attention to the German governement,Hitler found this party and found their ideas good but small so he decided to work on this party thus creating the Nazis.
hitler = bad. disagree if you want but this is my opinion.
Mind clarifying that?
You can say that Europe was in some way or another forced to mature, see some consequences.
The actual outcomes of Hitler are far more prolific and negative than simply saying Europe grew up.
For example, one outcome of Hitler, the Holocaust which is one of the blackest periods of human history and which has had perhaps the longest running impact of any event perpetrated by any head of state in the modern era.
One such impact, the empowerment of the zionist movement and its ultimate forceful and illicit uprooting of an entire people from land they had owned for nearly 1000 years to establish a state on purely political (despite subsequent claims to religious legitimacy) grounds as an act of international guilt resolution.
If not for Hitler's Germany, we very likely would not be faced with the unresolvable crisis that has plagued two or three successive generations and likely will continue for many more.
Another outcome, the division of Europe, for some 40 years, into Eastern and Western blocs with a nuclear standoff that shaped and skewed public perception of the "other side" on both sides of the iron curtain and fuelled propaganda machinery on both sides as well.
All in all the outcome of Hitler is as negative, if not more so, than Hitler's regime itself.
Have been revising chemistry all day. Up until half an hour ago. I clearly disagree with you, but will take that up tomorrow.
I am the last person you have to convince of that. But in means of technology, and mentality, don't you think that the war brought a growth?
I'll get fully back to it, after I've passed/failed my chemistry exam :nervous:
Sadly more than a half century later my own country (which escaped the ravages of that bygone world conflict on our own soil), has forgotten those lessons thanks to the arrogance and corporate greed of our current powermongering administration and has wrongfully dismissed the very institution which has allowed us the relative global peace in which to develop into the sole super power.
But all that is neither here nor there as far as the original question specifically related to the Nazi regime itself and its actions.
Without the international guilt resolution exercise that followed its inaction to prevent the Holocaust (especially in a largely anti-semitic FDR administration), the zionists would not have gained the political momentum and support they did and the process by which the political state of Israel was birthed might well have never come about. Nor would the European jews who provided the bulk of initial immigration into the new homeland likely have had any cause to uproot themselves.
Just to make any kind of confusion clear, I never stated nor meant, that the Holocaust could in any way be justified.