If you need urgent support, call 999 or go to your nearest A&E. To contact our Crisis Messenger (open 24/7) text THEMIX to 85258.
Read the community guidelines before posting ✨
Aged 16-25? Share your experience of using the discussion boards and receive a £25 voucher! Take part via text-chat, video or phone. Click here to find out more and to take part.
Options
Comments
Am not really a scientist (I'm more in to the human aspects behind environmentalism), but I do support renewables.
Do you remember who published the report?
That's not entirely true. The plants themselves don't cause much in the way of emissions, but all of the shit surrounding it (the mining of uranium, and so on) doesn't make them much cleaner than any of the fossil fuel plants. So I read anyway.
Incidentally, these hydrogen fuel cell cars. Are they possible on a larger scale as a power plant instead?
Naah,
Hydrogen fuel cells is all to do with how energy is stored
Hydrogen is made by applying electricity to water
http://www.wikihow.com/Make-Oxygen-and-Hydrogen-from-Water-Using-Electrolysis
So you need electricity in the first place. And to do that you'd need wind turbines, solar, etc.
Everytime a scientist gets close to announcing a new limitless fuel source they mysteriously die .. another one went last month.
http://pesn.com/2007/12/05/9500463_self-powered_battery_inventor_dead/
http://www.gather.com/viewArticle.jsp?articleId=281474977196745
http://www.rense.com/general72/oinvent.htm
True, but there will be surrounding activities to other types of power plants as well. Still have to dig for coal, search for gas on the seabed or make those windfarms as well. However, not sure about which one of them that genereates the highest amount of surrounding activities though.