If you need urgent support, call 999 or go to your nearest A&E. To contact our Crisis Messenger (open 24/7) text THEMIX to 85258.
Options
Take a look around and enjoy reading the discussions. If you'd like to join in, it's really easy to register and then you'll be able to post. If you'd like to learn what this place is all about, head here.
Comments
So you're saying that if France didn't have a military the US would have invaded?
Are you denying this? Yes/no?
Cheap French wine can be a bit risky, Australian and Californian prob safer but if you're spending a few quid French is the best. Shame it's normally the cheap stuff for me.
Er yes...How did the US benefit from Vietnam? Afghanistan? Iraq?
Afghanistan= desire to install friendly regime, furthering PNAC agenda and vision
Iraq= oil control, desire to install puppet regime in place, cementing US presence in area, furthering PNAC agenda and vision
If you actually think the US doesn't attack nations without any other reason other than furthering its interests and global vision, would you care to explain what kind of selfless act of sacrifice exactly prompeted the US to attack, bomb or invade the following nations?
China 1945-46
China 1950-53
Guatemala 1954
Indonesia 1958
Cuba 1959-60
Guatemala 1960
Congo 1964
Peru 1965
Laos 1964-73
Cambodia 1969-70
Guatemala 1967-69
Grenada 1983
Libya 1986
El Salvador 1980s
Nicaragua 1980s
Panama 1989
Sudan 1998
Afghanistan 1998
Nice copy/paste job.
The US, Canada and a few Caribbean countries invaded days after the Prime Minister was executed by rebels behind a Marxist coup...The landing day of US troops is known as Thanksgiving Day in Grenada.
Er it was prompted by Libya murdering hundreds of Americans...
Actually the French wine industry would collapse if we didnt pay them to destroy or turn into ethanol tens of millions of bottles worth. Another joy the CAP gives us.
How nice of the US to intervene to crush a rebellion. Who asked them?
Was it really? And which murder would this be? Seeing as Lybia had fuck all to do with Lockerbie and all...
Anything to say about the many other escapades?
Please let's not pretend the US has not been abusing its position of power for decades and illegally and pointlessly attacking nations for no good reason other than to serve its own agenda eh? We're all more intelligent than that.
Anyway, lets look at the North Korean situation...its just a guy with a buffont hair style, 17 children to a variety of women, a chronic alcoholic (like most successful world leaders ironically) and an avid hollywood fan who writes musicals. This is all just posturing...China are pissed, the South Koreans are now entitled to devolop Nuclear technology in their eyes and the eyes of the world as their greatest enemy threat has them now and probably the Japanese will begin "defensive" re-arming as a result too, thus pissing of the Chinese all over again.
Most people seem to accpet that Libya was behind Lockerbie, though there is potential doubt on whether the right people were convicted
The conviction of one of the suspects for the bombing was more than dubious (so much so that an appeal is in progress). The whole case was an immense cover-up; and this is no tin-foil hat conspiracy theory.
The plane was brought down by Palestinian terrorists on behalf of Iran, which was seeking revenge for the accidental destruction a year earlier by the Americans of an Iranian Airbus passenger jet resulting in hundreds of deaths that. Indeed, the US government and CIA initially point the finger at Palestinian terrorists but later switched targets. The 'evidence' presented to incriminate the two Lybian men was so laughable it would have been thrown out of any court in the UK.
Anyone in doubt is advised to order the Lockerbie report by Paul Foot published by Private Eye.
Meh, I find better stuff comes out of Eastern Europe, and also from the Asian areas.
And Australia makes some Beutiful wines!