If you need urgent support, call 999 or go to your nearest A&E. To contact our Crisis Messenger (open 24/7) text THEMIX to 85258.
Options
Take a look around and enjoy reading the discussions. If you'd like to join in, it's really easy to register and then you'll be able to post. If you'd like to learn what this place is all about, head here.
Comments
They were really made of glue, string, and modelling putty, and didn't exist. They were just mock-ups.
The people who worked there were actually in a big underground bunker planning ways for the government to get reasons to attack countries with oil.
So the flew some R/C planes into the big model buildings and they fell down and hey said people had died 'n stuff so the public was outraged. They blamed Afghanistan and invaded and then said Iraq was bad too and helped the Taliban, when it turned up thier original excuse was a lie.
So, there you have it. I hacked this off the CIA's computers! ITS TRUE!!!!!!
:yes:
To begin with I didn't believe the conspiracy theories about the 9/11 attack and the 7/7 bombings. I still am extremely skeptical, but I have been forced to admit recently that there is something to the argument that they were inside jobs.
Wasn't that the one where some tabloid got upset about the 'Arabs' (those guys are wearing turbans, they must be arabs!) celebrating 11/9?
I might be talking bollocks though but I am sure there was something like that somewhere........
AND if it was the Government, it changes everything, doesn't it?
You went to war on false pretences (Illegal). Your people were killed by thier own government in the most terrible way, and then lied about. People were falsley accused of commiting an appaling crime.
Your own soldiers have been dying for no reason.
You have distrubed the whole Middle East and made it unstable.
Because... your government said so.
Well, yes. But its a pretty big 'if'
It seems logical, and most likely.
Why do you think the second tower that was hit came down first? If you look you will see the plane hit midway down the tower, whilst the other building was struck near the top. The beams warping on the second tower came under alot more stress than the first, with all the extra weight, they gave way.
Maybe when you are one, you'll stop being so gullible.
Read this
http://www.911myths.com/html/wtc_molten_steel.html
Haha... ace...
You believe your sources, I'll believe mine. There's nothing that's a particularly credible source on that site and there were some very high level academics at the presentation I went to who's only intention in life was to play with the numbers.
Like the SEC is doing with Jacob Coby Alexander ?
But everyone know's we went to war on false evidence already, hell the British government just downloaded their evidence from the net. No one cares!
And what evidence about 7/7? There are eye witnesses of people who watched them do it, unless they were really dedicated MI5 agents I fail to see what conspiricy there can be.
Oh dear.
I've looked at the evidence for the various stories and I know what I believe, and I've found credible sources and valid calculations for it. I have no interest in the politics at all, just the engineering and physics.
I have drawn my own conclusions from all this research that there was more to it than the impact of the planes and the subsequant burning of the stuff that was supposed to be in the buildings and the planes (inlcuding furnishings and jet fuel).
Before you criticise my critical faculties please do enagage your brain. To have decided who to believe (like I stated I had) I must have some critical faculties.
(and if we were going to get picky when the mood takes me I can be a shit hot debater, and I tend to find to win competitions you have to have rather well honed critcal faculties)