Home Politics & Debate
If you need urgent support, call 999 or go to your nearest A&E. To contact our Crisis Messenger (open 24/7) text THEMIX to 85258.
Options

David Irving banged up!

124

Comments

  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Could you compare jews to homosexuals, in that they were both persecuted prior and especially during the nazi regime? Giving those of the jewish faith / race a homeland to call their own has only caused conflict, whereas now, although its no means ideal, homosexuals are treated as normal citizens, and have the rights of everyone else in many places around the world.

    But I as ever just want to expand peoples thinking, as especially with the israel debate, people are often too stuck in their own perspective / mindset to actually listen to what the other side is talking about.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    I think to answer this question, one has to first set out their own views on the Holocaust. Now, there are a few uncertainties about this. I personally do not doubt that it did happen. After all, what else could have happened at Auschwitz? Were Nazi Party workers just taking Jews there for their holidays? I seriously doubt it. The gas chambers that were uncovered, the dead bodies... I have no doubt it happened. Exactly how many died is up for question, and will almost certainly never be known. What is certain, however, is that the Final Solution was the most horrible, evil attempt to exterminate a whole people that the world has ever known, and it must NEVER be repeated.

    I come to David Irving's prosecution. I don't agree that he's a "right-wing martyr" now, as some of the press have stated. I simply think he's an idiot. To question the 'official' version of the Holocaust is not a crime, but to deny it ever happened is foolish in the extreme.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Has it ever occured to people that given Austria and Germany's history, and given the unspeakable horrors of the Nazis, these people feel they should take every step possible so that such atrocity is never repeated?

    And the first and logical step in ensuring that doesn't happen is stopping cunts from claiming it was all lies.

    You might not agree with such laws being into place. But the fact remains that they are in place. Irving went to a country and broke the law, and he's been punished for it. That's the end of it as far as I'm concerned. I wouldn't expect not to be punished if I go Austria and drive at twice the speed limit under the influence. Just as I wouldn't expect not to be punished if I'm caught breaking another law, including Holocaust denial.

    Christ...
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Or you were caught disobeying a law that said you had to turn over all Jews into the hands of the Gestapo?

    Moron.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Aladdin wrote:
    But the fact remains that they are in place. Irving went to a country and broke the law, and he's been punished for it. That's the end of it as far as I'm concerned. I wouldn't expect not to be punished if I go Austria and drive at twice the speed limit under the influence. Just as I wouldn't expect not to be punished if I'm caught breaking another law, including Holocaust denial.
    Yes. Under the laws of Austria, he broke the law, so he has to suffer the consequences. It is no crime to ask questions about the Holocaust, but to deny it ever happened is stupid and ignorant. As I said, Auschwitz wasn't a Jewish holiday camp. It was a death sentence to thousands of Jews, gypsies, people with mental illness, and anyone that Hitler didn't like.

    If I'd lived under that regime, a schizophrenic like me would be dead by now.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Aladdin wrote:
    You might not agree with such laws being into place. But the fact remains that they are in place. Irving went to a country and broke the law, and he's been punished for it. That's the end of it as far as I'm concerned. I wouldn't expect not to be punished if I go Austria and drive at twice the speed limit under the influence. Just as I wouldn't expect not to be punished if I'm caught breaking another law, including Holocaust denial.

    Christ...

    Aladdin,

    You have made numerous references in this thread to a law that Irvine broke. Do you actually know which law (name) he was accused of breaking ? And when (date) did this alleged transgression take place ?
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    seeker wrote:
    Aladdin,
    You have made numerous references in this thread to a law that Irvine broke. Do you actually know which law (name) he was accused of breaking ? And when (date) did this alleged transgression take place ?
    Although the question wasn't aimed at me, all I know is he was claimed to have broken the law in a speech he made to some students in 1989. Which law it was, I don't know.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Could you compare jews to homosexuals, in that they were both persecuted prior and especially during the nazi regime?

    6 million Jews died in the Holocaust compared to 10,000-25,000 gays. If we’re taking the 10% of the population are gay statistic then obviously a far higher proportion of Jews were murdered in the Holocaust than gays. People were not sent to Auschwitz for having a gay grandfather. Most gays in Nazi Germany could and successfully did hide their sexuality, few Jews successfully managed to hide their Jewish identity. (I’m not trying to trivialise suffering of other groups in the Holocaust).
    Giving those of the jewish faith / race a homeland to call their own has only caused conflict, whereas now, although its no means ideal, homosexuals are treated as normal citizens, and have the rights of everyone else in many places around the world.

    But I as ever just want to expand peoples thinking, as especially with the israel debate, people are often too stuck in their own perspective / mindset to actually listen to what the other side is talking about.

    It seems like you’re implying that Israel’s existence has only ever caused conflict. You must be unaware of Israeli achievements in science, the arts, philanthropy and commerce. Israel has provided a home to Jewish refugees from Europe and over three quarters of a million Jewish refugees from Arab states in the 20th century. Were I an Israeli I would be immensely proud of Israel’s accomplishments.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Yeah Stargalaxy got that law and date right. He has had a warrant out for his arrest in the country of question for some time indeed.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    It seems like you’re implying that Israel’s existence has only ever caused conflict.

    It's a state, it can only exist through conflict and violence. What are you, simple?
    You must be unaware of Israeli achievements in science, the arts, philanthropy and commerce.

    A quick demonstration of how an abstraction can do any of those things would be great, and some proof that it was needed in the endeavour would also be astounding. People never did painting without imaginary lines around them, did they? Science can't occur without a fictional state and men with guns?

    Some proof of Israel's actual existence in physical reality would be great as well.
    Were I an Israeli I would be immensely proud of Israel’s accomplishments.

    And barking fucking mad, to boot.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    subject13 wrote:
    Yeah Stargalaxy got that law and date right. He has had a warrant out for his arrest in the country of question for some time indeed.

    What law ??? No-one has revealed all on that one yet,even though many are talking about it.

    So far, Irving is alleged to have broken a law (which one ?) in 1989.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    seeker wrote:
    What law ??? No-one has revealed all on that one yet,even though many are talking about it.

    So far, Irving is alleged to have broken a law (which one ?) in 1989.

    That would be the one which says holocaust denial is illegal and I suspect no-one has revealed which one, not because it doesn't exist, but because none of us are experts in the Austrian judicial system.

    If you're so interested I suggest getting in contact with the Austrian embassy I'm sure they'll be able to give you chapter and verse.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    subject13 wrote:
    Yeah Stargalaxy got that law and date right. He has had a warrant out for his arrest in the country of question for some time indeed.
    Sadly, I'm not an expert in the Austrian justice system, so I have no idea what the name of the law is. All I knew was he was being prosecuted for a speech he made in 1989 under a law whose name I don't know of.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    NQA wrote:
    That would be the one which says holocaust denial is illegal and I suspect no-one has revealed which one, not because it doesn't exist, but because none of us are experts in the Austrian judicial system.

    If you're so interested I suggest getting in contact with the Austrian embassy I'm sure they'll be able to give you chapter and verse.

    That "one" to which you refer was enacted in 1992. Three years after the alleged offence ? If that is the case,how many "rule of law" worshippers also believe in retroactive law ?
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    seeker wrote:
    That "one" to which you refer was enacted in 1992. Three years after the alleged offence ? If that is the case,how many "rule of law" worshippers also believe in retroactive law ?

    Well I don't believe that retroactive laws are (generally) a good thing and I don't think holocaust denial should be a crime.

    But that's kind of irrelevant, because no matter how flawed the law of Austria I've been wearing a blue beret in a country where the law had collapsed and I know which one I'd rather live in (because you're not too bright Seeker, I'll give you a clue - it's Austria)
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    oh and btw the law was put in place in 1947

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/secondworldwar/story/0,,1648607,00.html
    The prosecutors filed charges under the 1947 law banning Nazi revivalism, specifically a paragraph criminalising the "public denial, belittling or justification of National Socialist crimes"

    http://news.independent.co.uk/people/profiles/article346741.ece
    It was 16 years too late, however, to stop him being jailedfor three years under Austria's 1947 law banning Nazi revivalism and criminalising the "public denial, belittling or justification of National Socialist crimes".

    http://news.scotsman.com/latest_uk.cfm?id=265642006
    Prosecutors filed charges against him under the 1947 law banning Nazi revivalism, and criminalising the "public denial, belittling, or justification of National Socialist crimes."

    http://vienna.usembassy.gov/en/policy/antisemitism_austria.htm
    The 1947 Law Against Neo-Nazi Activity ("Verbotsgesetz") prohibits any form of neo-Nazism and anti-Semitism and any type of activity in the spirit of National Socialism. In particular, it bans National Socialist or neo-Nazi organizations, and prohibits incitement to neo-Nazi activity, as well as the glorification or praise of National Socialist ideology. It also prohibits public denial, belittlement, approval, or justification of National Socialist crimes, including the Holocaust.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Looks like NQA thinks that law and order are the same thing.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    klintock wrote:
    Looks like NQA thinks that law and order are the same thing.

    Not neccessarily, but in reality lawlessness equals disorder and with disorder life is nasty, brutish and short. And all the theories in the world of why this isn't true isn;t going to beat the reality that it is.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    NQA wrote:
    Well I don't believe that retroactive laws are (generally) a good thing and I don't think holocaust denial should be a crime.

    But that's kind of irrelevant, because no matter how flawed the law of Austria I've been wearing a blue beret in a country where the law had collapsed and I know which one I'd rather live in (because you're not too bright Seeker, I'll give you a clue - it's Austria)

    What were you doing there,besides showing off your headgear ?
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Not neccessarily, but in reality lawlessness equals disorder and with disorder life is nasty, brutish and short. And all the theories in the world of why this isn't true isn;t going to beat the reality that it is.

    Nah bollocks.

    Your missing some key ingredients I think.

    Where is a good one. When is another. Who is great too.

    I've lived miles from anywhere, where the nearest policeman was hours away. There was no law. But there was order. I've lived in the centre of cities, surrounded by policemen, judges and the law and theres been no order whatsoever. No theory here, just experience. People generate spontaneous order. How else could they have come up with the law at all?

    They aren't synonyms by a long sight.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    lawlessness equals disorder and with disorder life is nasty, brutish and short

    Just as state enforcement of unjust, undemocratic (dare say, outright tyrannical) laws has a long history of making life brutish and short for far too many. So too, in fact, have the transnational wars of aggression waged under the pretense of enforcing/imposing "the rule of law", even as they have made a mockery out of countless legal and moral precepts.

    Wouldn't hold my breath waiting for a self-acknowledged MIC-indoctrinated lackie like NQA to decry systemic injustice, he'd just as soon help facilitate it.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    NQA wrote:
    oh and btw the law was put in place in 1947

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/secondworldwar/story/0,,1648607,00.html

    http://news.independent.co.uk/people/profiles/article346741.ece

    http://news.scotsman.com/latest_uk.cfm?id=265642006

    http://vienna.usembassy.gov/en/policy/antisemitism_austria.htm

    The prosecutors filed charges under the 1947 law banning Nazi revivalism, specifically a paragraph criminalising the "public denial, belittling or justification of National Socialist crimes"

    So he wasn`t prosecuted under the 1992 "Holocaust denial" law that everyone has said he was.

    Logically,can there be such a thing as a "National Socialist crime" ? As others have pointed out,everything the National Socialists did was "legal" :chin:
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Personally I have not researched the holocaust. However, the figure claimed is said to be approx six million Jews and five million gays, homeless, mentally ill, and anyone considered a political dissenter.

    So, eleven million humans over the period of WWII, which was approx five years. This equates to more than six thousand every day including weekends and xmas!

    Have these bodies been recovered? Or is all the evidence from witness statements and the testimony of nazi war criminals?

    I don’t know, has anybody researched the holocaust?
    :confused:
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Gothmar wrote:
    Personally I have not researched the holocaust. However, the figure claimed is said to be approx six million Jews and five million gays, homeless, mentally ill, and anyone considered a political dissenter.

    So, eleven million humans over the period of WWII, which was approx five years. This equates to more than six thousand every day including weekends and xmas!

    Have these bodies been recovered? Or is all the evidence from witness statements and the testimony of nazi war criminals?

    I don’t know, has anybody researched the holocaust?
    :confused:

    Take care when asking questions like that ;) . You may be breaking someone`s law.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Gothmar wrote:
    Personally I have not researched the holocaust. However, the figure claimed is said to be approx six million Jews and five million gays, homeless, mentally ill, and anyone considered a political dissenter.

    So, eleven million humans over the period of WWII, which was approx five years. This equates to more than six thousand every day including weekends and xmas!

    Have these bodies been recovered? Or is all the evidence from witness statements and the testimony of nazi war criminals?

    I don’t know, has anybody researched the holocaust?
    :confused:
    I don't know a great deal about the Holocaust apart from that it was horrible. It kind of annoys me sometimes when people can assume that it was only the Jews that suffered when there were homosexuals, the mentally ill, gypsies and political dissidents although I don't remember this in any history books in schools.

    I don't believe the man should be punished. I think what he said was terrible but that imprisoning him won't do anything more than act as a recruiting tool for right wing political parties and give them something else to whinge about. I think also that a big point in remembering the Holocaust is that we should never let smething like that happen again.

    Most people love freedom of speech until they disagree with what is being said.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Aladdin wrote:
    What on god's green earth has an internet search company selling its core principles down the river in order to make a quick buck has to do with a Holocaust denier ignoring the laws of the country he's a guest in and indulging in a spot of illegal Holocaust denying??????

    It seems things are more connected than first thought

    http://lipstadt.blogspot.com/2006/02/google-censors-antisemitic-video-and-i.html
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    seeker wrote:
    So he wasn`t prosecuted under the 1992 "Holocaust denial" law that everyone has said he was.

    When you say everyone, you mean everyone but the dozens of sources which make clear he was prosecuted under a 1947 law. I've shown you a few, but a rudimentary search of google will pick up more
    Logically,can there be such a thing as a "National Socialist crime" ? As others have pointed out,everything the National Socialists did was "legal" :chin:

    No - various member were tried for crimes which were illegal under treaties the Germans had signed up to, including treatment of prisoners and civilians in occupied territories. You could possibly claim it was 'legal' what they did to German Jews it was illegal to murder Polish Jews, as the Germans had a duty to ensure their welfare as the occupying power.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Just as state enforcement of unjust, undemocratic (dare say, outright tyrannical) laws has a long history of making life brutish and short for far too many. So too, in fact, have the transnational wars of aggression waged under the pretense of enforcing/imposing "the rule of law", even as they have made of mockery of of countless legal and moral precepts.

    Wouldn't hold my breath waiting for a self-acknowledged MIC indoctrinated lackie like NQA to decry systemic injustice, he'd just as soon help facilitate it.

    :D
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    NQA wrote:
    When you say everyone, you mean everyone but the dozens of sources which make clear he was prosecuted under a 1947 law. I've shown you a few, but a rudimentary search of google will pick up more

    I meant everyone whose opinion I had seen or heard up to reading your links (thanks for those)
    NQA wrote:
    No - various member were tried for crimes which were illegal under treaties the Germans had signed up to, including treatment of prisoners and civilians in occupied territories. You could possibly claim it was 'legal' what they did to German Jews it was illegal to murder Polish Jews, as the Germans had a duty to ensure their welfare as the occupying power.

    So "rule of law" worshippers should only show indignation to the treatment handed out to "legally acknowledged non-German Jews" if they are to remain consistent to their belief system?
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    seeker wrote:
    So "rule of law" worshippers should only show indignation to the treatment handed out to "legally acknowledged non-German Jews" if they are to remain consistent to their belief system?

    Yes, if you believe in the absolute rule of law. Few people do. But the fact that the rule of law is flawed in some cases, doesn't mean that the absence of it leads us to some sort of utopian paradise.
Sign In or Register to comment.