If you need urgent support, call 999 or go to your nearest A&E. To contact our Crisis Messenger (open 24/7) text THEMIX to 85258.
Options
Stolen eletricity, buckets of acid, eletrified door handles...
BillieTheBot
Posts: 8,721 Bot
Apparently there has been such an explosion of home growing in parts of London certain councils are asking people to sniff and see if their neighbors are growing.
They have found that young kids are finding home growing flats then breaking in and stealing the stuff, so the growers are setting traps for them to prevent theft.
And most of the eletricity that they use is stolen, dodgy wiring right into the mains from the street causing a big fire hazard.
Yet still they say we shouldn't have legal supply!?!
They have found that young kids are finding home growing flats then breaking in and stealing the stuff, so the growers are setting traps for them to prevent theft.
And most of the eletricity that they use is stolen, dodgy wiring right into the mains from the street causing a big fire hazard.
Yet still they say we shouldn't have legal supply!?!
Beep boop. I'm a bot.
0
Comments
I dont think we will import any 'skunk' cannabis soon, it will all be grown here, if it isnt already.
And as for the strength, I doubt it, its up to the grower, but stronger goes for more cash doesnt it.
The strongest strains tend to be the hardest to grow. A pal of mine used to grow a few plants from top quality strains, the harvests were small and he needed to put a fair bit of effort into it to get the desired quality.
Growing average strains with minimum effort seems to be very common, i've smoked some shit grass recently, loads of it about, and none of it cheaper than £40 a q.
europe and ever moreso the uk ...have been exporting the best weed for quite a few years ...do keep up.
Meh, it looks like thre could be more on the streets soon then. Yay for that.
No Not really... dealers selling weed don't charge more for a 'stronger' strain, the majority know fuck all what strain and how much THC CBD etc content it
contains.
Maybe you know people who sell by strain, most people don't and pay a standard price.
fucking government job scheme, doing the exact opposite of what they intend. Their intentions are for a police state anyways.
Drugs should be dealt with by health authorities, not by the police. Obviously
LOL - how exactly do you work that one out?
Absurd logic if I ever saw it.
Please tell me how legalisation would lead to "keeping the semi-comatose heavy users in continuous supply to everyone's detriment" any more than our current system does now?
Stricter punishments for burglery and theft? Why?
Pay for their own healthcare? What the fuck are you talking about? Legalisation would boost the economy considerably, so that's a nonsense suggestion.
So benifits everyone, really.
Lots of cheap weed = lots of people smoking lots of it all the time = lots of people too stoned to do anything else, like get a job = people who have jobs paying to keep the slackers in unemployment benefit = unhappy population = change of government to one harder on drugs
That all depends on the standards you expect society, and the individuals within it, to attain.
I think you'll find there are a hell of a lot of alcoholic low life bums that just sit around and drink all day nstead of get a job :impissed:
No but it causes some pretty serious problems.
Very few smokers are lazy stoners who sit about and do nothing, it's the same with alocohol, if you treat the drug properly there'll be no problem.
But there are a vast, vast, number of ordinary folks who go out and enjoy a few drinks with friends and have no problems. Yes, it would be lovley if everyone didn't abuse it, but, inevitably, a few folks will always cause problems. But there is treatment availible and groups like AA (Not the car one.).
Essentially it's my view that legalisation would negatively effect more people than it would positively effect and calls for such an action are clearly selfish.
How many people are actually put off consuming drugs by the law?
How many people do you think say, hmm, cannabis is a Class C drug, I'm not touching it because I might, if unlucky get a formal warning from a copper?
The current drug laws have next to no real deterant factor at all.
If some drugs were legalised we may see an increase in use, but we would also see a decrease in harmful use, overdoses, contaminated supply, infections etc would be cut.
Also you would see a massive fall in certain types of crime to pay for drug habits.
Why? What would be stupid about giving heroin addicts the supply they physically need?
There are more reasons to legalise than to have things as they are. This woman knows what she's talking about, have a look at this...
http://www.susanblackmore.co.uk/Drugs/HAC03.htm
Interesting, though a little unrealistic, a society where all drugs were legally available wouldnt be a utopia. If we didnt address poverty and poor living conditions I dont think it would solve much of the problem.
As she says, current initiatives are no more than mopping up the problems caused by prohibition.
Thats a good way of putting it, but its the mind set now isnt it, we can't imagine being able to buy drugs legally, its unthinkable.
And of course prohibition is an industry now, especially in the US, there's too much money being made catching users and banging them up.
Unfortunately because of drug propaganda thats true. Most people immediately think you're a junkie criminal if you told them you occassionally take them.
I'm off the opinion that recreational drug use is like buggery, not really anyones business except mine and my partners.