If you need urgent support, call 999 or go to your nearest A&E. To contact our Crisis Messenger (open 24/7) text THEMIX to 85258.
Options
Take a look around and enjoy reading the discussions. If you'd like to join in, it's really easy to register and then you'll be able to post. If you'd like to learn what this place is all about, head here.
Comments
no, i think you're probably right. it doesn't.
so, back to my original point - why is it being presented as if it should make a difference?
also note that in many of the articles they start the story saying he may have had an expired visa. they end by saying 3 would-be terrorists are still at large. they are connecting a story where there really shouldn't be one. people will associate them.
All 4 would be terrorists are in custody btw.
The propaganda gets better and better! :rolleyes:
the police say ...the politicians say ...the media agree ...and there we have it ...case closed.
of course it was them ...no need for courts ...so no need for law.
how's the keyboard?
guess what ...the big heavy coat being worn on a hot summers day ...turns out to be a small denim jacket!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I'm not sure you get extra marks for presentation.
That "bomb" is nothing short of a pisstake.
waits for fbi, cia, mi5 and backup of army and police to arrive
However, given that it didn't explode its possible the bombmakers weren't experts. They also seem to have been relying on blast, more than shrapnel, which is why they didn't use many nails. They were just an additive, rather than the main agriedient.