Home Politics & Debate
If you need urgent support, call 999 or go to your nearest A&E. To contact our Crisis Messenger (open 24/7) text THEMIX to 85258.
Read the community guidelines before posting ✨
Options

CIA director is out. Why? No reason...

Here in the UK, under this utterly dreadful "New Labour" government, we've become increasingly used to the pathetic spectacle of ministers never resigning when they do wrong. When we discovered paedophiles were working in our schools, Ruth Kelly did not hand in her notice. When we discovered Two Shags might have been using government offices to bonk his secretary, he did not walk out with his head bowed in shame. When we found out 1023 criminals, including murderers, rapists and paedophiles had not been deported at the end of their sentences, Charles Clarke handed in a "phantom resignation" as it's been dubbed. We were told he'd offered his resignation. It emerged he had done no such thing.

Only on Thursday night was Margaret Beckett talking on Question Time, defending his (total absence of) honour. Yet on Friday, he is out. The only reason he went was because the incompetent Blair sacked him, and rightly so. I feel nothing but cynicism and contempt at this stage for our rulers. I look elsewhere for salvation, if for nothing else to take my mind off UK politics.

Across the pond, President Bush has announced that the head of the CIA is stepping down, but states no reason why. Says Aunty Beeb: "No reason was given for the move, which was presented at a hastily arranged press call at the White House, where the two men exchanged compliments. Mr Goss has served in the role for less than two years, since being given the job of reforming the agency after a series of intelligence failures. Mr Bush did not nominate a successor, but said reforms of the CIA would continue." >> More on this >>

How incredibly strange. No accusations of misconduct or incompetence have been made, yet the head of the CIA, a somewhat political post, has abandoned ship. This after less than two years. The White House will not tell us why. What a bizarre contrast. Where ministers would never resign for any reason whatsoever in the UK, the head of the CIA suddenly leaves of his own accord for no reason. Expect more speculation about this in days to come.

We live in such a strange political environment at the moment, don't we?
Beep boop. I'm a bot.

Comments

  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Horse and pony show to give the mentally compacent masses the illusion of a shakeup in the government. This is a well worn tactic in US politics especially with the public uptight about immigration and other issues unrelated to the true criminality of this administration.

    Be sure that critical posts like this will be filled with another neocon ideologue in due course.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    We live in such a strange political environment at the moment, don't we?

    we allways have mate.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Watergate sex parties ?
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    HE has gone from the CIA because he couldnt do what he wanted to do.
    Shaking up the CIA would be like a Foreign Minister in the UK trying to turn around the Foreign office. It just doesnt happen, ergo the man has thought "fuck this, im not going tobe the fall guy the next time Bush, cheyney and Rummy fuck up!" and he has jumped off the ship.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    I believe he(and others) have been doing what they wanted to a little too much for some.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Maybe he's found his conscience? Given what CIA has done and continue to do over the years, most people would prefer to work for NAMBLA.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    He's been playing around with hookers. No joke. A huge shitstorm is preparing to hit the Republicans over prostitutes and he is implicated.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Mmm... very interesting. Where did you hear that?
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Cain wrote:
    He's been playing around with hookers. No joke. A huge shitstorm is preparing to hit the Republicans over prostitutes and he is implicated.
    Stranger things have happened. This is US politics we're talking about, so it could be anything, really. Still very little about it in the news. This is distinctly odd.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Cain wrote:
    He's been playing around with hookers. No joke. A huge shitstorm is preparing to hit the Republicans over prostitutes and he is implicated.
    I could have sworn that said sitcom! Can you imagine, the director of the CIA gets the piss taken in Will and Grace :lol:
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Aladdin wrote:
    Mmm... very interesting. Where did you hear that?

    http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2006/4/27/212534/995

    Hardly the most neutral of sources, but its being widely talked about in the American political internet. Cunningham's parties could easily have as big as an effect on the 2006 elections as Abramoff, if the Democrats play it correctly. I doubt they will, but you never know.
Sign In or Register to comment.