Home Politics & Debate
If you need urgent support, call 999 or go to your nearest A&E. To contact our Crisis Messenger (open 24/7) text THEMIX to 85258.
Read the community guidelines before posting ✨
Options

US launching huge air attacks in Iraq

1235711

Comments

  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Back on topic, the raid was a huge failure. Just saying. Roughly $15 million spent for each person captured, and its not even known if they are insurgents (meaning they probably aren't, given there was no resistance to their arrests).
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    1066 ...no one in manchester knew it had happened for months.
    battles used to fought on battle fields ...the civilians being a prize and not a target.
    the first world war changed that and the second completed it.

    Evolution in warfare, you mean. There is an Israeli who wrote a great book on the 3 stages of war, can't remember his name though. He was wrong, because there is at least a fourth emerging, but its a good read nonetheless.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    1066 ...no one in manchester knew it had happened for months.
    battles used to fought on battle fields ...the civilians being a prize and not a target.

    True - but most civilians victims of war die from disease and starvation, not from direct enemy action. This happens even today in wars like the Congo war so I expect it must have happened even more in medieval Europe where plague and starvation were already common.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    In the meantime, and back to the topic, yet another allegation of a hideous war crime by US Marines is made:

    US Marines 'summary execute 15 innocent men, women and children' in revenge for roadside bomb attack

    Hearts and fucking minds, eh?
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    It was hearts and minds that got them in this mess.

    they were too soft and lax after the intial war was over, the rmeains of the forces still loyal to saddam had to be fought and that allowed the inurgents to build and anti american feeling to build and criminals to rise in number, terrorists to surge in (which is a plan in itself) and they were allowed to geta foothold.

    these people had just come out of a country ruled by a regime of fear, fear the new and worked on them. The allies needed to carry ont hat sense but obviously not in the same way as saddam.

    they needed to present a strong front. they should have had tanks in the streets and soliders out patrolling on every corner. This would show the potential insurgents what power the allies had and created psychological barriers to resistance.

    But treat your locals right, still build up the political side, get facilities back online fast like water and electricty, fix up the hospitals. That would all have won support.

    But now th einsurgency is so huge and easy sucide attacks all the time, the people , well some of them, are demoralised and now its a right fucking mess.

    More plan and action, less PR is what was needed.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    They weren't that soft and lax - on March 29 2003, the US Army dispersed an unarmed crowd of protestors in Falluja by shooting directly into them, killing 17 people. I'm not surprised that Falluja became a centre for the insurgency any more than I'm surprised that a lot of people joined the IRA after Bloody Sunday.

    The only 'hearts and minds' policy the US seems to be pursuing in Iraq these days is to splatter the hearts and minds of Iraqis all over the walls of their own houses.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Pff.

    And the americans are getting away scot free?? They don't have a couple of thousand body bags sent home??

    2 sides my friend.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Walkindude wrote:
    It was hearts and minds that got them in this mess.

    they were too soft and lax after the intial war was over, the rmeains of the forces still loyal to saddam had to be fought and that allowed the inurgents to build and anti american feeling to build and criminals to rise in number, terrorists to surge in (which is a plan in itself) and they were allowed to geta foothold.

    these people had just come out of a country ruled by a regime of fear, fear the new and worked on them. The allies needed to carry ont hat sense but obviously not in the same way as saddam.

    they needed to present a strong front. they should have had tanks in the streets and soliders out patrolling on every corner. This would show the potential insurgents what power the allies had and created psychological barriers to resistance.

    But treat your locals right, still build up the political side, get facilities back online fast like water and electricty, fix up the hospitals. That would all have won support.

    But now th einsurgency is so huge and easy sucide attacks all the time, the people , well some of them, are demoralised and now its a right fucking mess.

    More plan and action, less PR is what was needed.

    Id like to repost something I did before as feel its relevent, reading whats above. can you beleive Walkindude but for a couple of phrases designed to make it humerous my post could be one of his, or one of the opinion of millions of Americans
    I fully support the American action, more Bombing is definatly the way forward, especially if there dropped from airplanes and helicopters at a great height.

    Its just the other day I was thinking about Iraq and obviously what they realy need there are more bombs, frankly they havnt had nearly enough explosions there. Some people would maybe disagree with me but then theyd be just commies, pinkos, homosexuals and anti-Americans.

    The sooner Iraq's wake up and realise the selfless actions of the Americans are only for their benefit, to bravely bomb a country and dispose of its evil dictator, some of the far left comentators might think thered be other reasons for this action, but what do you expect from people who dont watch exclusivly Fox News.

    Those Iraq's who arnt gratfull for the American presence in their country clearly deserve to die.

    This will be the last push as the insergency is just the reminents of Sadam's regeime and a few forign fighters put there by the evil state of Iran, who isnt selflesly thinking of only the Iraqie people but just want to further their own power and they dont care how many people they kill to get it. They couldnt be more different than the saintly christian administration of George Bush
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Fuck of you dickhead
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    It is amusing to me how some people claim to be reading what walkindude is saying but clearly only reading one line then posting a response and ignoring the full content.

    He is right, after the initial invasion American forces should have aggressively gone about hunting down th elast of Saddams old regime, while simultaneously protecting Hospitals, Schools, Electricity and Water facilitites. instead america went about protecting the oil industry and let everything fall in on itself in the country.

    As for this Massacre story, as soon as the investigation is over and there is an official verdict saying they are guilty (most likely even though much of it seems exagerated from both sides) it will be clear to all concerned that America is losing control of its troops, much like they did in Vietnam. When will Iraq have its own Mai Lai Massacre i wonder, one much worse then this one.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    17th March -
    I actually think that the left wing case for the war is far more convincing and coherent than anything Bush said.

    Good examples include Christopher Hitchens, Nick Cohen and Johann Hari.

    18th March - Johann Hari writes a column titled "Why I was wrong about Iraq."

    http://www.johannhari.com/archive/article.php?id=831
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    subject13 wrote:
    It is amusing to me how some people claim to be reading what walkindude is saying but clearly only reading one line then posting a response and ignoring the full content.

    He is right, after the initial invasion American forces should have aggressively gone about hunting down th elast of Saddams old regime, while simultaneously protecting Hospitals, Schools, Electricity and Water facilitites. instead america went about protecting the oil industry and let everything fall in on itself in the country.
    It is not Saddam's allies and henchmen that have been behind the insurgency at all I'm afraid. Therefore no matter how aggressive the US would have been operating after the main hostilities were over, it wouldn't have made one iota of difference. If anything, it would have helped recruit even more people to the insurgency, if that was at all possible.

    What Walkindude (and apparently you too) have failed to see is that no approach the US could have possibly tried after they toppled Saddam's regime would have worked. They are still seen as unwelcome, highly despised and unstrusted illegal invaders in the eyes of the immense majority of Iraqis, including those who hated Saddam.

    And more to the point, what the antiwar lobby had warned about 5 hundred trillion times in the build-up to the war also came to be true: removing Saddam in such fashion would create a very dangerous vacuum of power and order, and would let the country open to any and all sorts of fighters, insurgents and terrorists, from hardline Islamists to professional hijackers. Not to mention the different tribes and ethnic groups of Iraq to start fighting amongst themselves of course.

    Still, it doesn't help that the US army chooses to break even more articles of the Geneva Convention and shows a total disregard for innocent lives.

    All allied troops must be removed immediately and in full from the totality of Iraq and replaced by an UN peacekeeping force.. It might still not stop a civil war- perhaps nothing now will- but at least it will not make things steadily worse than they are.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Actually I'm short of the actual figures to date, J:

    about 33,000 to 37,000 civilians killed so far
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    103 dead British troops. Over 3,000 dead American troops. Over 37,000 dead Iraqis. Countless grieving families. Doesn't that tell you everything about the folly of this war?
  • Options
    Teh_GerbilTeh_Gerbil Posts: 13,332 Born on Earth, Raised by The Mix
    stargalaxy wrote:
    103 dead British troops

    Probably most shot by the fucking yanks.

    I can't beleive how stupid/evil they are... some of the stuff they've shot couldn't be more obviously freindly if it tried. And shooting down a Tornado... when NO IRAQI PLANES EVER TOOK OFF.

    Its sheer stupidity... not to mention the A-10 Pilot who shot at a British lot... for no reason... he went on a cowboy run just like that... obviously British too.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    I think Aladdin you are missing what position is. I agree with you on Americas behaviour in the post-war. What i am saying is, and i probably failed to make it clear, is that American troops should have, once invading, had a strategy for the peace. As in maintaining hospitals, schools, government ministries in place and then positioning none Saddam loyalists and none extremists into the Government for the interim period, leading upto elections. They should have protected the people but maintained the nation as a nation rather then allowing anarchy to ensue.

    I admit i said specifically Saddams followers, i should have used the term "insurgents" as it is more broad. But that is what they should have done after the war ended and the "Peace" began. I am not talking or arguing on the merits of going to war, i think that has been argued out enough already and we would all just be going over ourselves for the umpteenth time.

    Many Iraqis see the coalition as invaders to be hated, but an equal number would not want them to leave for fear of what might happen if they did. Sadly the UN has no military of its own and with out America or British muscle to back up the UN they would lose control of the country and fail miserbly as they did throughout the entire Bosnian war and in other parts of the world where the UN has basically fucked up over and over again.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    18th March - Johann Hari writes a column titled "Why I was wrong about Iraq."

    Regrettable, but not unforseen - he is a leftie after all.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    20th March 2063- on the 60th anniversary of the war on Iraq, The Matadore, aged 75 and virtually the only person left on Earth who still claims the war on Iraq was a good thing, writes an article titled "Why everyone in the world is a clueless leftie"







    :p
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    I was merely pointing out that those on the left, because of their reverence for moral relativism, nearly always lack principles.

    There are notable exceptions - George Orwell springs to mind.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Aladdin wrote:
    20th March 2063- on the 60th anniversary of the war on Iraq, The Matadore, aged 75 and virtually the only person left on Earth who still claims the war on Iraq was a good thing, writes an article titled "Why everyone in the world is a clueless leftie"







    :p


    the world isn't black and white aladdin, and you shouldn't be so smug.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    I was merely pointing out that those on the left, because of their reverence for moral relativism, nearly always lack principles.

    There are notable exceptions - George Orwell springs to mind.

    You're quite fond of daft comments with no basis in reality aren't you?
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    You're quite fond of daft comments with no basis in reality aren't you?

    The stop the war coalition is one of the most repulsive organisations in the UK and, along with the Respect party, is absolutely devoid of any laudable principles.

    The mainstream face of the left in the UK has given up on the struggle against fascism - and for that they can never be forgiven.

    No notice need be taken of these people. It does not matter what they think. It never mattered what they thought.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    I was merely pointing out that those on the left, because of their reverence for moral relativism, nearly always lack principles.

    There are notable exceptions - George Orwell springs to mind.

    What sort of principles are you talking about exactly?
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    What point is there in discusing this issue with you Matadore if you actually believe Stop the War is a left wing organisation?

    It isn't.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    The stop the war coalition is one of the most repulsive organisations in the UK and, along with the Respect party, is absolutely devoid of any laudable principles.

    The mainstream face of the left in the UK has given up on the struggle against fascism - and for that they can never be forgiven.

    No notice need be taken of these people. It does not matter what they think. It never mattered what they thought.

    I'm with you on that as it goes. Respect are a joke.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    What sort of principles are you talking about exactly?

    Opposition to fascism and solidarity with oppressed people across the world.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Walkindude wrote:
    the world isn't black and white aladdin, and you shouldn't be so smug.
    :D
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Aladdin wrote:
    What point is there in discusing this issue with you Matadore if you actually believe Stop the War is a left wing organisation?

    It isn't.

    They are actually a front for Respect/SWP.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Opposition to fascism and solidarity with oppressed people across the world.

    What are you on about now?
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    What are you on about now?

    Principles which anti-war leftists abandoned long ago.
Sign In or Register to comment.