If you need urgent support, call 999 or go to your nearest A&E. To contact our Crisis Messenger (open 24/7) text THEMIX to 85258.
Read the community guidelines before posting ✨
Options
Essential support for under 25s
Essential support for under 25s
Take a look around and enjoy reading the discussions. If you'd like to join in, it's really easy to register and then you'll be able to post. If you'd like to learn what this place is all about, head here.
Comments
Blacks came to America as early as the 1600's and have interacted even before that.
:banghead:
By feminism, i'm talking about those people and organisations who assert that gender difference is nothing more than social construct.
I've been reading various feminist sites recently, and one recurring theme i noticed was that of "scientific speculation shouldn't matter - it's irrelevent, can only continue unfairness" blah blah blah.
A lot of these hardcore feministas won't take into consideration biological difference - they won't accept it as possibility, and ignore anything science may have to say on the matter if it doesn't back up their position.
It's emotion over logic.
black and white have lived side by side for thousands of years.
your trapped in the deepest darkest parts of africa bit.
meaning ...the african continent was largely unknown and unexplored until the last few hundred years.
remember ...africa is a stones throw away from spain ...so the interaction has gone since the dawn of man.
The only difference which would cause any problems would be difference in collective intellectual capacity. If this was to be found to be true, then the BNP et al would be vindicated.
Yes and I think that's what Stormfront vindicate themselves on aswell...though it's hard for someone of another race to suceed in tests made by whites and where intelligence is determined by those who live in that society.
In my understanding, the point is that yes, there are differences, but its how those differences are expressed and the meanings that we attribute to them are social constructs.
but since that does not happen in the world, people develop differently. For a black growing up in the ghetto, an education isn't important, so they arn't working their brain as much as other kids.
I think ultimatly, enviroments define who you are.
Feminists (allied with homosexual activists) want a society where gender and sexuality is disregarded, completely. A society where "everyone is gay" and gender has absolutely no social relevence. Basically, a society everyone becomes androgenous.
I don`t know about that.I find Trey Parker more adept at social commentary than all the self-proclaimed political tv programmes put together.Once you stop laughing,try to take in the "message".I suspect more educational than a university sociology PhD.
seeker
seeker
The feminist-homosexual alliance puport to be focussed around the deconstruction of what they consider male, heterosexual social control, rather any desire to implement their version of it. They believe, on the face it, that their ideal of society is natural. By denying the relevence of scientific reality in favour of an abstract idea however, i'd say social control is part of the agenda as any vaguely intelligent feminist knows social control would be required as their premise is an evidently false one which strives against nature.
What a ridiculously sweeping statement.
You gotta be having a laugh, right?
Of course i'm not saying every feminist thinks that - i'm talking about the hardline driving force behind the movement.
No.
Who are these people then?
People like Johnathon Katz, the "gay historian", who says - "if gay and lesbian liberationists ever achieve full equality, they will do away with the social need for the hetero/homo division. The secret of the most moderate, mainstream gay and lesbian civil rights movement is its radically transformative promise" (The Invention of Heterosexuality).
...and Allen Young, one of the movers and shakers of the Gay Liberation Movement who reckons - "In a free society, everyone will be gay" (Intimate Matters).
w00t
But I've heard that one reason for a lack of progress in countries is climate, land fertility etc.. but then why, until we arrived centuries ago, was New Zealand still tribal (with Maoris etc)? Isn't New Zealand a lot like England in some ways? Or am I completely off the mark? Sorry if I sound a bit ignorant.
and who are they? Who listens to them? Who takes them seriously?
lol some of south parks observations are perfectly valid, especialy the hate crime one!
and not to start even more flaming, many people ive met who call themselves feminists, tend argue any behaviour a woman has is perfectly acceptable whilst denying many men to behave in their natural way (and i dont mean killing and raping or anything like that here)
for example there is nothing wrong with not making too much effort to look nice which many guys do
and on a tangent from other posters many of my lesbians friends i think have a good attitude to life simply cause they're willing to recognise that boxers are the most comfy underwear ever ie from my experience more lesbian girls value comfort of clothing over its looks, which i think is a fantastic quality friends should have as im a lazy sod myself
They all have hairy legs though.
Well, I think it was Fanon who wrote about this in "black skin, white masks" (good book, recommended) and one of the types in early black stereotypes was the 'uppity N-word'- often ejaculated from the mouths of other blacks. I have however also read some american-Jewish ranting about blackface too so... That one was odd and I can't recall ever having understood his point or what comparrison he was trying to make, I'll have to dig it out. Do you like Spike Lee?