Home Politics & Debate
If you need urgent support, call 999 or go to your nearest A&E. To contact our Crisis Messenger (open 24/7) text THEMIX to 85258.
Read the community guidelines before posting ✨
Options

they say university is full of wannabe socialists

Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
was stuck in an argument today, i'm considering going into college teaching after uni to teach chemistry or maths - i got criticised by almost everyone cause i said i'd never teach in a private school :s

what's so wrong in that? if i had to get paid 20k/year instead of 35k/yr i'd do it

almost all private schools maintain the 'elite' effectively by sponging the trained teachers(who were trained entirely in the state sector) and the brightest students(by their ever so 'charitable' bursaries), but to most people at my university, their end wages matter more than anything :s dont they dreams other than wealth?


rant over
«13

Comments

  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Well do what you want to do, a good percentage of students i've across are tossers but hey what can ya do.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Well I'd love to work in human rights, so say if I were a human rights barrister I wouldn't mind getting 20K instead of 35K (I have no idea what barristers earn, probably less in human rights)... However I would bepissed off if I were getting the same pay as somebody who didn't work their way through education (then again... a lot of footballers get more than most people).

    Personally I think the poverty gap is a huge cause of problems in the UK...
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    I think you'll find that the difference in pay between the public and private sector is not as much as you imagine.

    So what if no one else agrees with you? Do what you want to do.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Well I'd love to work in human rights, so say if I were a human rights barrister I wouldn't mind getting 20K instead of 35K (I have no idea what barristers earn, probably less in human rights)...

    Cherie Blair is a human rights lawyer. 'nuff said about thier wages...
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    was stuck in an argument today, i'm considering going into college teaching after uni to teach chemistry or maths - i got criticised by almost everyone cause i said i'd never teach in a private school :s

    what's so wrong in that? if i had to get paid 20k/year instead of 35k/yr i'd do it

    almost all private schools maintain the 'elite' effectively by sponging the trained teachers(who were trained entirely in the state sector) and the brightest students(by their ever so 'charitable' bursaries), but to most people at my university, their end wages matter more than anything :s dont they dreams other than wealth?


    rant over


    you.....dirty......commie :banghead:


    ;)
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    I agree. I'm training to be a secondary school teacher, and i'd quite happily accept less pay to work in state schools.

    (uni is so full of wannabe socialists :( )
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    I agree. I'm training to be a secondary school teacher, and i'd quite happily accept less pay to work in state schools.
    Why?
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    That's strange. So you'd work in a state school even if the pupils were worse, pay was worse and working environment worse too?
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Some people have principles. Same reason that some people choose to work in the charity sector when they could get paid much more in the private.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Exactly, teaching is one of those professions were (some) people are probably motivated by more than just money.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    No job should really be money-driven...it should be passion driven, unfortunately in today's world there just isn't the oppurtunities available to most.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Exactly, teaching is one of those professions were (some) people are probably motivated by more than just money.
    Granted, job satisfaction plays an important part too.

    I ask why because I'm not convinced you adequately explained why teaching in the state sector demonstrates any different ideals from teaching in the independent sector...
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    turlough wrote:
    No job should really be money-driven..
    Is it possible to be passionate about most jobs? Most people work to live, rather than live to work and I see nothing inherently wrong with that.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Kentish wrote:
    Is it possible to be passionate about most jobs? Most people work to live, rather than live to work and I see nothing inherently wrong with that.

    Why do they work to live though? Why does the majority of the people do the majority of the work but get the minority of wage packets...yes they work to live but it shouldn't be like that
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    turlough wrote:
    Why do they work to live though? Why does the majority of the people do the majority of the work but get the minority of wage packets...yes they work to live but it shouldn't be like that
    What should it be like?

    Even if we all lived in a hippy happy commune, we'd only be ploughing the fields and milking the cows in order to eat - not for the pleasure of it.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Maybe it's because i went to a State school, and i think i came alright, and i'd rather give people who may not have a chance, a chance, rather than helping those who are already priviledged advance further. To me it would be greater if a child from a deprived council estate (or whatever) wrote a fantastic essay on Shakespeare, than someone from middle class suburbia.

    I don't know it's hard to explain, but it's how i feel.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Kentish wrote:
    What should it be like?

    Even if we all lived in a hippy happy commune, we'd only be ploughing the fields and milking the cows in order to eat - not for the pleasure of it.

    No we wouldn't...why do you think money is even necessary...in real terms it's just as valuable as the leaves that grow on trees.

    I'm not saying I know all the answers because for some brilliant utopian like idea there'll be many flaws, i'm just saying that if you have a passion then go for it, money is fairly inconsequential.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    turlough wrote:
    No we wouldn't...why do you think money is even necessary...in real terms it's just as valuable as the leaves that grow on trees.

    I'm not saying I know all the answers because for some brilliant utopian like idea there'll be many flaws, i'm just saying that if you have a passion then go for it, money is fairly inconsequential.
    Ah, but the logical conclusion to what you were saying is that people should work for the love of it, not for any material reward they get in return. I suggest that is not realistic.

    Of course you should ideally go into a job you will enjoy, but sometimes we all end up in jobs that pay the bills but don't satisfy us beyond that.

    And I believe it is a bit naive to say now that you will work with the poor and needy and change their lives by sacrificing your own material comfort. It's an honourable declaration to commit yourself to a lifelong career in the public sector, but a lot of people change their views after a little while in the job. We'll see...
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Well I suppose thats true enough...though I believe our love of material comforts is not something thats naturally inside us...I'm sure you lived happily enough without a mobile or ipod when you were growing up, now people can't see a life without them...if you can get used to loving material needs then you can get used to not loving them...and I'm sure there'll be a day when we'll need to give it up for whatever reasons.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Kentish wrote:
    I ask why because I'm not convinced you adequately explained why teaching in the state sector demonstrates any different ideals from teaching in the independent sector...

    Can't you work it out?
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Kentish wrote:
    What should it be like?

    Even if we all lived in a hippy happy commune, we'd only be ploughing the fields and milking the cows in order to eat - not for the pleasure of it.

    I think people get more pleasure if they have control over what they do and when they do it.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Blagsta wrote:
    I think people get more pleasure if they have control over what they do and when they do it.
    i think thats stating the obvious but when building power stations hospitals highways etc ...you have to work hard ...when your told ...not when you fancy turning up.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    You have a real talent for missing the point.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    My Dad works for a private school..........

    Private schooling directly benefits poor people. Indirectly you might be able to argue that it is damaging in some long-run manner, sustaining inequality etc, but that isn't a done and dusted argument by any means.

    So I don't see why you would consider working in state schools to be 'better' in a moral sense.

    If all teachers refused to work in private schools, that sector would collapse, the immediate result of which would be to hurt the poorest people.

    I am always distrustful of 'morality' that applies to the individual action but wouldn't apply to the group action.........
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Toadborg wrote:
    Private schooling directly benefits poor people.

    Now I'd love you to explain how a schooling system that is directly dependent on NOT being poor "directly benefits poor people".
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Toadborg wrote:
    Private schooling directly benefits poor people.

    It might benefit a hand full of so called "poor kids", but only those who manage to get through on scholarships and the like. The majority of kids at private school come from financially secure families, who obviously can afford this type of education.

    In response to the original poster, work where you like, it's your choice. Personally I think that you can still receive a level of satisfaction from teaching in a private school as well as a typical comp. I think as a teacher you should want to teach any children, regardless of their social class or whatever. Obviously the salary isn't going to be the only factor, but for me at least, it might play a part.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Toadborg wrote:

    Private schooling directly benefits poor people.

    :lol:

    You've excelled yourself this time.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Oh dear.......

    Private schools are paid for by the kids parents principally.

    Thus these people are paying for their own kids education and paying their taxes that go towards everyone elses educations.

    If there were no private schools then all the private kids educations would have to be paid for by the state, they would have to build new schools, pay the teachers etc.

    This would require more taxes.

    This would directly hurt poor people.

    Whether you like it or not the richer people who send their kids to private schoold are helping everyone else out of their own pockets.

    Hence the direct effect is beneficial.

    Of course there are arguments baout equality of opportunity, reinforcing social division etc as I aknowledged. Whether this indirect effect outweighs the direct benefit is debatable in my opinion......
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Toadborg wrote:
    Oh dear.......

    Private schools are paid for by the kids parents principally.

    Thus these people are paying for their own kids education and paying their taxes that go towards everyone elses educations.

    If there were no private schools then all the private kids educations would have to be paid for by the state, they would have to build new schools, pay the teachers etc.

    This would require more taxes.

    This would directly hurt poor people.

    Whether you like it or not the richer people who send their kids to private schoold are helping everyone else out of their own pockets.

    Hence the direct effect is beneficial.

    Of course there are arguments baout equality of opportunity, reinforcing social division etc as I aknowledged. Whether this indirect effect outweighs the direct benefit is debatable in my opinion......

    it does reinforce social divisons, adds kudos to children of wealthier parents, poaches teachers, provides no means for average ability average wealth children to get poached teachers or smaller class sizes

    the best thing we can make use of as our birth rate is falling is that class sizes will fall naturally, however the government has seen this an oppurtunity to reduce staff numbers long term (from a report from last year can't find it)


    and as they give extremely bright children almost free entry (to boost their overall results obviously) - the students in normal schools fail to see a large minority suceeding and reinforces an attitude of 'why bother' which is the plague of normal schools
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Toadborg wrote:
    Oh dear...

    Just what I thought when I read that.

    The poor are benefitted because the rich pay taxes? Well, gee, isn't that nice of them- rich people putting something into society.

    And they pay taxes without going to the school! Can you feel the generosity there! I help poor children too, then, because I pay tax too!

    Blagsta is right, you have excelled yourself this time.
Sign In or Register to comment.