Home Politics & Debate
If you need urgent support, call 999 or go to your nearest A&E. To contact our Crisis Messenger (open 24/7) text THEMIX to 85258.
Read the community guidelines before posting ✨
Options

Sex education - state's role?

Here's the story, click on it.

Teenage pregnancy? Big problem, isn't it? Requires serious answers, wouldn't you agree? So, what has the Liberal Democrat health spokesman, Steve Webb, offered as part of the solution? Why, only that parents should not be allowed to stop them attending sex education lessons. He says "I'm opposed to children being taken out of sex education. We all know parents with whom sex education just isn't going to happen."

Effectively, he's implying that parents cannot be relied on to teach their children about sex. Let's be under no pretences. British parents are awfully shy when it comes to talking to their kids about sex. And that's a reason to let the state take over, isn't it? Typical of Liberal Democrats - when it comes to serious problems, all they have to offer are gimmicks to get headlines in the following day's newspapers. And they accuse Labour of the same thing!

I honestly despair. :banghead:
Beep boop. I'm a bot.
«1

Comments

  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    So, after your despairing - what do you suggest as an alternative or improvement?
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Am I missing something? I think the Lib dems are a bunch of useless idiots who would manage to fuck the country up totally if they got into power. But I'd have thought that saying some parent s won't discuss sex with their children and that someone has to (and that probably has to be the school) is pretty uncontroversial.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    So what do you suggest then Stargalaxy?
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Sounds fair enough to me.

    I certainly don't remember being taught anything by my parents.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    It seems to me to be two entirely different points, mixed up together.

    Some parents don't teach their kids about proper sex ed. Fair enough, no one can fault that line of reasoning, because it's true.

    Some parents object strongly to having their kids told about sex for whatever reason (religion or whatever) and want to teach their kids themselves according to their own beliefs. i.e. homosexuality is bad and baby jesus cries when you touch yourself or whatever.

    Doesn't seem to me that the two groups of parents would be the same. people.

    Nowhere do I see a need for the "state" to force anyone into learning anything if the parents are opposed to it.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    stargalaxy wrote:
    Here's the story, click on it.

    Teenage pregnancy? Big problem, isn't it? Requires serious answers, wouldn't you agree? So, what has the Liberal Democrat health spokesman, Steve Webb, offered as part of the solution? Why, only that parents should not be allowed to stop them attending sex education lessons. He says "I'm opposed to children being taken out of sex education. We all know parents with whom sex education just isn't going to happen."

    Effectively, he's implying that parents cannot be relied on to teach their children about sex. Let's be under no pretences. British parents are awfully shy when it comes to talking to their kids about sex. And that's a reason to let the state take over, isn't it? Typical of Liberal Democrats - when it comes to serious problems, all they have to offer are gimmicks to get headlines in the following day's newspapers. And they accuse Labour of the same thing!

    I honestly despair. :banghead:

    What's wrong with that? State power? It's hardly an abuse of state power to educate every child about sex - it's an obligation for any progressive, objective and clear minded society.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    It's an important topic.

    I have the opinion that it's a good deal more important than PE (for example). Especially when you consider that pregnancy isn't the only possible effect of unprotected sex.

    As much as I'm not really one for too much state intervention, if you have to go to school and learn things, then this is as important as many other subjects.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    So if the state has the reponsibility to educate children at school, what should they teach? Safer sex, the names of common STIs, pregnancy, family planning, abstinence, how to have a relationship...?
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    I think it is up to parents to teach their children about sex education, I think it is the schools role to reiterate it! Maybe it would be useful if dedicated teams were set up in areas around the country and students have to go to a sex education week and have an exam on it. Make sex education a GCSE! Thats my good idea! Dunno if its that good though...but maybe it would be taken more seirously if it was taken as part of the curriculum and parents had to ensure that their children new about sex education to get there qualification.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    The Liberal Democrats are a joke; no true liberal takes them seriously. The only people who vote for them are 18-year-old 'Lib Dems' who know nothing. There is something quite repulsive and deeply sinister about people who want children (some as young as six) to be taught about sex. I suspect they despise the innocence of children, so desperately seek to abolish every shred of it from their impressionable minds. As the teenage pregnancy rate continues to increase in the tens of thousands, they argue for more graphic and explicet sex education, claiming it as the only option to control it, against the caution of every study on the matter.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Oh dear BS (apt initials donchathink?) how far from reality you actually live. Is it nice there?
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    :banghead: they argue for more graphic and explicet sex education, claiming it as the only option to control it, against the caution of every study on the matter.

    Although in reality, studies show that societies with a more relaxed attitude to sex eduation have lower teen pregnacy rates...
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Blagsta wrote:
    Although in reality, studies show that societies with a more relaxed attitude to sex eduation have lower teen pregnacy rates...
    lol :yes: Bring On The Sex Education GCSE :yippe: LOL
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    I suspect they despise the innocence of children, so desperately seek to abolish every shred of it from their impressionable minds

    Careful, or the pages of the Mail will start sticking together.
    Although in reality, studies show that societies with a more relaxed attitude to sex eduation have lower teen pregnacy rates...

    And lower STI rates. And they lose their virginity later on in life, because they were in an atmosphere where sex was in an open and honest place - not naughty, rebellious and adult.
    Make sex education a GCSE!

    I don't really know if I agree with this. Sex and relationship ed - they're life skills in how to cultivate a person into an adult with a healthy approach to their lifestyle and giving them enough info to make informed choices - turning it into something which has correct or incorrect answers to get a grade may not be the best approach.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    go_away wrote:
    I don't really know if I agree with this. Sex and relationship ed - they're life skills in how to cultivate a person into an adult with a healthy approach to their lifestyle and giving them enough info to make informed choices - turning it into something which has correct or incorrect answers to get a grade may not be the best approach.
    LOL I kinda meant it in a light hearted way, but I do think if there was more involvement with the homework side of sex education then parents might get more involved, at my school we didn't get sex education until I was in year ten, by then most of the year had experienced sex first hand! We never had any homework or anything on it either, in fact I definately learnt everything I know from my mates and magazines.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    but I do think if there was more involvement with the homework side of sex education then parents might get more involved

    I agree. It's obviously a difficult thing for parents to do if they grew up at a time where it was taboo or just left up to the schools, but I'm sure if there was group work involving parents, and then groups of parents with teenages who aren't their own children, it may produce some good results, at least encouraging a discussion on it
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    I don’t really think it should be up to schools to provide sex education, anti-drugs education and anti-smoking messages. I don’t think there’s anything particularly radical about believing that school’s should be academic; their sole function being to provide people with an education. Perhaps if schools were allowed to concentrate on what they were originally intended to do our education system would be somewhat better…

    Charities such as TheSite as well as parents, youth groups and family planning clinics are obviously far better qualified on these matters than schools; leave it up to them it’s not the job of schools.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    But education is political...deciding what is taught in what manner is a political decision...
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Blagsta wrote:
    But education is political...deciding what is taught in what manner is a political decision...

    Uhuh, yes it is...Were you going to expand on that?
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Just pointing out the flaw in your statement about school's "sole function being to provide people with an education" - this has never been the sole function of a school and never will be.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Blagsta wrote:
    Just pointing out the flaw in your statement about school's "sole function being to provide people with an education" - this has never been the sole function of a school and never will be.

    I don't see the flaw. Whilst it is not true in practice the (intended) sole function of a school is to provide people with an education.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    No it isn't. School's have many functions - one of which is to educate. However, this role cannot be divorced from the social and political context. For instance, one of the role's of school is also to socialise children and to instil the norms and values of the society they live in.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    .
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Blagsta wrote:
    No it isn't. School's have many functions - one of which is to educate. However, this role cannot be divorced from the social and political context. For instance, one of the role's of school is also to socialise children and to instil the norms and values of the society they live in.

    Hmm true. Perhaps 'primary' is a better description than 'sole'. Although I think school's helping to instil the norms/values of society in children is perhaps an almost unintended but fortunate consequence of school's role. My original point still stands though in that I think schools main (okay not sole :)) aim should be to give people an education. Anti-drugs/smoking campaigns, sex education, etc to me is outside of their territory.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    I think a lot of the parents I've spoken to professionally could do with a few lessons as well to be honest.

    Unfortunately, yes :(

    Especially seeing as we had to 'top up' even the most basic sex ed at the last school I was at. A group of girls were taught that they only had to take the oral contraceptive pill on the nights they were sexually active
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Hmm true. Perhaps 'primary' is a better description than 'sole'. Although I think school's helping to instil the norms/values of society in children is perhaps an almost unintended but fortunate consequence of school's role. My original point still stands though in that I think schools main (okay not sole :)) aim should be to give people an education.

    Yes, should be. Its not though and never has been. The main aim is to instill the ideology of our culture. Schools don't teach learning, a love of knowledge. What they actually do is beat it out of you. Small kids are natuarally fascinated by everything...a few years of schooling soon changes that.
    Anti-drugs/smoking campaigns, sex education, etc to me is outside of their territory.

    Depends really. Ideally parents should do that sort of thing, but often they don't. Research does show that countries that teach about sex and relationships earlier have less teen pregnancy and STD's etc. So no, schools role is not just about academic teaching and never has been.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    stargalaxy wrote:
    Here's the story, click on it.

    Teenage pregnancy? Big problem, isn't it? Requires serious answers, wouldn't you agree? So, what has the Liberal Democrat health spokesman, Steve Webb, offered as part of the solution? Why, only that parents should not be allowed to stop them attending sex education lessons. He says "I'm opposed to children being taken out of sex education. We all know parents with whom sex education just isn't going to happen."

    Effectively, he's implying that parents cannot be relied on to teach their children about sex. Let's be under no pretences. British parents are awfully shy when it comes to talking to their kids about sex. And that's a reason to let the state take over, isn't it? Typical of Liberal Democrats - when it comes to serious problems, all they have to offer are gimmicks to get headlines in the following day's newspapers. And they accuse Labour of the same thing!

    I honestly despair. :banghead:

    Thats fair enough, but 'I honestly believe that having watched that awful excuse for a documentary - 'no sex please, we're teenagers', that teenage pregnancy is more of a class thing. I know very few middle class teenage mums, I'm sorry but its a fact. How many teenage mums do you see a day??

    This sounds awful, but I'm just making a point. I think it's to do with the environment you're brought up in, the education you receive and your parents. It can't all be blamed on the teachers surely??! And the education system? If teenagers want to go out and shag eachother at an early age because they're misinformed as to what the consequences are then it is essentially up to the parents to be more involved!

    For example, that woman a while ago, who was openly blaming the fact that schools lack adequate sex education for the fact that her three teenage daughters were all mums before the age of 20! Of course not the fact that they might have simply been following the sister's examples??

    I have nothing against teenage mums, who want children at a young age, or have found themselves in a situation where they're pregnant and want to keep it. But surely blaming the education system is not really a viable option at all..... ??

    I know I'm going to get slated for this...so apologies if anything I've said offends...
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    I know very few middle class teenage mums, I'm sorry but its a fact. How many teenage mums do you see a day??

    There was a study a while ago which suggested that pregnant teenagers from privaleged backgrounds were more likely to abort.

    Where I work, we get girls from pretty much all backgrounds, so it's harder for me to pinpoint and say it *is* a class thing (and believe me, I hate the UKs obsession with class). What does frighten me though is seeing year of births such as 1990, 1991 etc
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    go_away wrote:
    There was a study a while ago which suggested that pregnant teenagers from privaleged backgrounds were more likely to abort.

    Where I work, we get girls from pretty much all backgrounds, so it's harder for me to pinpoint and say it *is* a class thing (and believe me, I hate the UKs obsession with class). What does frighten me though is seeing year of births such as 1990, 1991 etc

    I agree, it is a very generalised statement, but I think it swings that way in the majority. I dislike the preoccupation with class as well, but people insist on using such terms as 'posh' and 'common' for the way that people talk as well as the way they were brought up?!! Its madness.

    It's scary to think that there are people out there my age with 5 year olds. A couple of girls in my secondary school have had kids, one of whom started infants this september?!!!!!!!! :shocking:
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Thats fair enough, but 'I honestly believe that having watched that awful excuse for a documentary - 'no sex please, we're teenagers', that teenage pregnancy is more of a class thing. I know very few middle class teenage mums, I'm sorry but its a fact. How many teenage mums do you see a day??

    This sounds awful, but I'm just making a point. I think it's to do with the environment you're brought up in, the education you receive and your parents. It can't all be blamed on the teachers surely??! And the education system? If teenagers want to go out and shag eachother at an early age because they're misinformed as to what the consequences are then it is essentially up to the parents to be more involved!

    For example, that woman a while ago, who was openly blaming the fact that schools lack adequate sex education for the fact that her three teenage daughters were all mums before the age of 20! Of course not the fact that they might have simply been following the sister's examples??

    I have nothing against teenage mums, who want children at a young age, or have found themselves in a situation where they're pregnant and want to keep it. But surely blaming the education system is not really a viable option at all..... ??

    I know I'm going to get slated for this...so apologies if anything I've said offends...

    Yes, a lot of it is a social and class thing. If you don't give working class kids the opportunities, the education, the self worth that middle class kids (mostly) get, then they are going to attempt to find that self worth/validation another way...
Sign In or Register to comment.