Home Politics & Debate
If you need urgent support, call 999 or go to your nearest A&E. To contact our Crisis Messenger (open 24/7) text THEMIX to 85258.
Read the community guidelines before posting ✨
Options

government trying to increase amount of education

Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
from 5 to 16 to 3 to 18 by this:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/education/4696325.stm

completly pointless, put more training places in with this money, and id rather parents took some role in their childs education, not leaving it to the state for 12 years, why do you think in europe most kids start school at 7, cause their paretns take a real interest in teachin their kids the ultimate basics

disgraceful personally trying to get all 3 year olds into formal education

Comments

  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Ahh still some free minds slipping through the net then.

    Why lock kids away to learn useless shite when they need to know how to read , write and basic maths, the address of the local library and some thinking skills.

    Oh that's right, if you are going to install fundamentalist beliefs you have to do it young, before the mind can defend itself.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    klintock wrote:
    Ahh still some free minds slipping through the net then.

    Why lock kids away to learn useless shite when they need to know how to read , write and basic maths, the address of the local library and some thinking skills.

    Oh that's right, if you are going to install fundamentalist beliefs you have to do it young, before the mind can defend itself.


    what i was trying to lightly put, anyone can normally teach their child the alphabet, and some basic english and maths
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    what i was trying to lightly put, anyone can normally teach their child the alphabet, and some basic english and maths

    And to think....

    State education's goal is to provide you with all the building blocks if thought so you won't actually have to do any thinking. You are in England, right, 2 times 2 makes 4 and obey authority for the sake of it......sad innit.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    klintock wrote:
    And to think....

    State education's goal is to provide you with all the building blocks if thought so you won't actually have to do any thinking. You are in England, right, 2 times 2 makes 4 and obey authority for the sake of it......sad innit.

    I never was told to 'obey the state' throughout my schooling....
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    klintock wrote:
    And to think....

    State education's goal is to provide you with all the building blocks if thought so you won't actually have to do any thinking. You are in England, right, 2 times 2 makes 4 and obey authority for the sake of it......sad innit.

    very, teaching children in a non formal environment is the best anyway, otherwsie theyre under pressue to do things for results tables etc etc

    i knew my times tables from age of 8 and could read fluently by 9, not the best, but useful..... my cousins doing his maths gcse at 12 cause he's mildly autistic.... the girl i tutor in AS Level chemistry, ive told her to spot how things change, not exactly what they are individually, and shes realised theres far less to remember than a couple of simple rules yet strangely they work better than trying to cram everything

    at uni i cant cram everything for exams, the amounr of examined material is only half of what were taught, and what we're taught is so much you couldnt possibly learn it all exactly, you have to learn the vague chemical trends and some simple formulas, and derive the more exact answers
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    I never was told to 'obey the state' throughout my schooling....

    Pay attention when I am talking to you? Bell rings what do you do? Nice neat uniforms? Or did you argue with your teachers when they were wrong and that was fine? Ever wander out at lunchtime cos you wanted too? Rewrite a textbook cos it was bollocks?

    I said authority, which once you have been thoroughly institutionalised and given partial freedom (to work and earn for your masters) you will assume to be "the state".
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Europeans start education aged 7.

    Europeans have better education.

    Surely some mistake?
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Surely some mistake?

    Yeah a usual government solution. It isn't working, so let's do it more.....
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    klintock wrote:
    Pay attention when I am talking to you? Bell rings what do you do? Nice neat uniforms? Or did you argue with your teachers when they were wrong and that was fine? Ever wander out at lunchtime cos you wanted too? Rewrite a textbook cos it was bollocks?

    I said authority, which once you have been thoroughly institutionalised and given partial freedom (to work and earn for your masters) you will assume to be "the state".

    You are insane you know that.

    Somehow I don't think Children can be trusted to educate themselves in the classroom. Hence the need for teachers.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    klintock wrote:
    Pay attention when I am talking to you?
    Nobody ever did at our school, except the ones who wanted to learn.
    klintock wrote:
    Bell rings what do you do?
    Ignore the teachers who said "the bell is for me, not for you" and left anyway.
    klintock wrote:
    Nice neat uniforms?
    Only the weird ones. Even when we got Uniform Cards, and six signatures meant detention after school, nobody took any notice.
    klintock wrote:
    Or did you argue with your teachers when they were wrong and that was fine?
    Pretty much, if we could argue why we thought they were wrong rather than arguing just for the sake of it.

    I think teaching kids at school from 3 years old is bollocks though. Most three year olds wouldn't have the attention span to sit in a classroom and learn. I know I didn't at 3, and I was one of the quiet ones :|.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    I think 5 is way too young to be sat in a schoolroom, they should at best be in a nursery playing in the sand pit.

    3 is just taking the piss.

    More monkeys for the organ grinder.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    You are insane you know that.

    Yes, completely. What's your point? Even the mad can be right and so you are going to have to addres what I said instead. (That was logic I believe)
    Somehow I don't think Children can be trusted to educate themselves in the classroom. Hence the need for teachers.

    They need to be in classrooms? Odd, I see no reason why.
    Ignore the teachers who said "the bell is for me, not for you" and left anyway.

    Disobeyed the teacher but obeyed the bell, great!
    Only the weird ones. Even when we got Uniform Cards, and six signatures meant detention after school, nobody took any notice.

    You went in your own clothes and only when you felt like it? Nice. How often did you bother going?
    Pretty much, if we could argue why we thought they were wrong rather than arguing just for the sake of it.

    And they changed the textbooks in line wth what you came up with? Cool.
    I think teaching kids at school from 3 years old is bollocks though. Most three year olds wouldn't have the attention span to sit in a classroom and learn. I know I didn't at 3, and I was one of the quiet ones :|.

    First point yes. Second point no. I've seen kids apparently with ADD play with the same toy for 4 hours straight, which indicates a high level of concentration for some things. Perhaps it's just boring, uninspiring shite they struggle with.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Renzo wrote:
    You are insane you know that.

    Somehow I don't think Children can be trusted to educate themselves in the classroom. Hence the need for teachers.


    in europe most children start to go to school at 7, surely they're all thickheads then?
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    klintock wrote:

    First point yes. Second point no. I've seen kids apparently with ADD play with the same toy for 4 hours straight, which indicates a high level of concentration for some things. Perhaps it's just boring, uninspiring shite they struggle with.


    exactly my cousin has im not sure, he's either mildly autistic or ADD or something, anyway he used to have problem at school then he went to a special school and he's doing REALLY REALLY well now, he's a nice kid - quite good at unreal tournament for a kid :shocking: :p
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    klintock wrote:
    Disobeyed the teacher but obeyed the bell, great!
    Yes, because some of us actually wanted to learn what we were being taught in the lessons. But we didn't want to be in there longer than we were meant to be. Kill me now for wanting to learn :rolleyes:.
    klintock wrote:
    You went in your own clothes and only when you felt like it? Nice. How often did you bother going?
    Yeh, 'cause I really wanted to ruin my own clothes at school. I'd rather wear a uniform and look the same as everyone else than have everyone pick on me for what I used to wear outside of school, like they did with some of the people on non-uniform days. I didn't say that, either. Like I said above, I wanted to learn, thanks.
    klintock wrote:
    And they changed the textbooks in line wth what you came up with? Cool.
    Of course they didn't. But they didn't write them in the first place, did they. Except for one of the Science teachers, but that's not the point. They encouraged us to argue what was written, and come up with our own ideas.
    klintock wrote:
    First point yes. Second point no. I've seen kids apparently with ADD play with the same toy for 4 hours straight, which indicates a high level of concentration for some things. Perhaps it's just boring, uninspiring shite they struggle with.
    Toys are different though, aren't they? I've seen my 3yo baby sister sit and play with a hair scrunchie for hours, but try and make her do anything where you tell her she has to sit and listen for more than 10 minutes and she gets bored.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    i never went to primary school and just before i went to secondary school i was a bit worried that i wouldn't hack it academically because, hell, these kids have been formally schooled for 6 years already, what chance do i have with a few hours a week of tutoring?........turns out i couldn't hack it, not academically mind........there are few things on this earth more dull than school, i pretty much sleep(slept?)walked through 5 years of my life because while I enjoyed some of the lesson content, it was just far too slow so I would complete the work and then fall asleep........and if the lesson ever got interesting, then the bell would ring and whoopie off to another montonous lesson......i found i was never allowed to express or interpret things for myself, with the exception of english literature maybe, and even then you would only get top marks in the exam if you interpreted the text according to how the teacher interpreted a certain passage.......so it became a lesson in repetition and not freedom of expression........and that is the moral of school, the teacher is always right and you are just a kid so what do you know?
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    And where are the teachers for these extra years gonna come from?thin air? most schools are short staffed as it is, without having younger children t teach. Or are they just gonna make classes even bigger?
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    And where are the teachers for these extra years gonna come from?thin air? most schools are short staffed as it is, without having younger children t teach. Or are they just gonna make classes even bigger?
    Ooooh that'll be fun. It was hard enough to be taught properly in a class of 25. What are they gonna make it now? Smaller classes are always better to learn in, I've learnt more in my Spanish class (of 7) this year than I ever learnt in a 30-person French or German class. I remember no French, I couldn't read it if I tried, but I can just about read Spanish, if I know the tense and stuffs.

    My old school is also massively increasing. The student population went from 1000 to about 1250 in 5 years. That's 50 new students a year. They went from 8 tutor groups in the year below me to 12 in the now year 8's. There was not enough classroom space. Where are they gonna get the room for all the new kids from, as well as the teaching staff?

    The whole idea is just stupid imo.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    klintock wrote:
    Yes, completely. What's your point? Even the mad can be right and so you are going to have to addres what I said instead. (That was logic I believe)



    They need to be in classrooms? Odd, I see no reason why.



    Disobeyed the teacher but obeyed the bell, great!



    You went in your own clothes and only when you felt like it? Nice. How often did you bother going?



    And they changed the textbooks in line wth what you came up with? Cool.



    First point yes. Second point no. I've seen kids apparently with ADD play with the same toy for 4 hours straight, which indicates a high level of concentration for some things. Perhaps it's just boring, uninspiring shite they struggle with.

    1. Well where else would they learn? Or are you suggesting every child should be closed up in their own homes and not get to meet other children?

    2. The bell is the sign the lesson is over, of course people are going to leave.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Up until sixth form, I was regularly taught in classes of 30+, it wasn't easy to learn as there was a range of abilities in those classes and the teachers had to cater for all those abilities. I can hardly remember someof what i was taught in those classes, yet i can remember most of what i was taught in sixth form cos the classes were so much smaller. At uni, in some of the seminars it is nearly one on one tuition which makes it a hell of a lot easier to learn.
    I recently went back to visit my primary school, and it was having a new classroom built, along with the 5 new classrooms built a few years back. If 3 year olds are to be taught, they will require even more rooms. Some schools just cant grow any bigger. At my primary school they have large grounds so it would be possible to build more classrooms at the loss of some of the sports field.
    But as i said before, where would the teachers for these extra classes come from?
    And as Franki said, how many 3 year olds would have the concentration span to learn anything worthwhile? If some parents took more interest in spending time with their children and playing educational games and so on, instead of just shoving the kids infront of a tv/dvd, then maybe there wouldnt be the need to teach 3 year olds in school settings
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    To be fair none of this is mandatory. They're trying to encourage people to stay onto school rather than go out and get jobs and since 1997 there has been a range of measures trying to make sure that all 3 and 4 year olds can have a place at playschool or nursery.

    Personally I'd be quite happy for my children to have a couple of hours at playschool each day, it socialises them into dealing with other children and is cheaper than having to pay a nanny.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    If some parents took more interest in spending time with their children and playing educational games and so on, instead of just shoving the kids infront of a tv/dvd, then maybe there wouldnt be the need to teach 3 year olds in school settings
    Or even shoving them in front of one of those wonderful educational programs/DVDs they have out now. My baby sister loves Ceebeebies, and some of the stuff on there is really good (not that I watch it :p). But I agree, it does come from the parents. I guess it's up to them to make their initial learning experiences interesting and fun, so they will want to learn more. Putting a child in a classroom environment at 3, when they have had little chance for a fun learning experience at home, will make them bored and uninterested in what's going on. Playgroup maybe, I had a lot of fun at Playgroup, building with Lego and stuff (which *is* a kind of learning), but had I been put in a classroom at that age, I would have just got bored.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Parents don't have enough time to teach their children basic skills before sending them off to school. Because they're slogging their guts out, for longer that europeans, and in some cases getting payed less.

    I learnt just about all of what was taught to me in reception and year 1 before i even got to school, because my mum worked for the council and i was sent to the same nursery as the lord mayors kids, as part of my mum's pay deal. If they put more money into improving preschool provisions, and gave more support to mums who want to stay at home this wouldn't need to be done.

    Kids are at school for less time and still resieve a better education in europe. This could be down to the whole family getting involved in the kids homework activities. And the sizes of the classes are much smaller, the teachers are much more dedicated, and given more one to one help. If people are struggling they are kept behind more and the standards of the tests set are far higher.

    you need a total overhaul in how the education system works and give parents more insentives to help their children out and get them intrested in what their child does and give them more of a chance to see what their child does in school.

    School can often turn intelegent toddlers into blabbering sheep who leave school with nothing. And no one seems to care...

    If kids were allowed to exspress themselves in more creative methods and were given more challenges then this wouldn't be happening. No one is being stretched apart from teachers patients...
Sign In or Register to comment.