If you need urgent support, call 999 or go to your nearest A&E. To contact our Crisis Messenger (open 24/7) text THEMIX to 85258.
Read the community guidelines before posting ✨
Options
september 11th..
Former Member
Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
i have read many theories about who was responsible for this crime.
who do you think was responsible?.....us government?......binladen?
who do you think was responsible?.....us government?......binladen?
0
Comments
Al who? I heard Bush planned the whole attack, so he could steal their pensions
Blagsta finally shows his face!
Can't speak for anyone else.
Where were you at the time Deano?
I remember finishing work early and watching the whole thing unfold at the pub with pint in hand.
Good entertainment in a sick kind of way.
are you serious...sky news did nothing but show continous footage of the planes hitting the buildings
http://sa.briantist.com/tribute.wmv
Very bad taste, but slightly amusing... you have been warned
The FBI were quickly on the ball."It was them that done it"
Amazingly,some of "the guilty ones" weren`t on the victims list
Miraculously,even those two immense structures couldn`t stand the heat,some of the "guilty ones" got out alive
seeker
Seriously. You claim to be such an open minded guy for using drugs, but you just seem like a prat to me, with some bizarre vendetta against people who dont use drugs.
Drugs are bad for you, they dont make you clever or insightful, idiot.
That's the thing. Often the ones who claim to be most openminded are the ones who are least so. They're only openminded to a certain group of people, and therefore the exact same as the conservatives and reactionaries who they are so eager to run away from - just that in these cases they are openminded towards another group of people.
Oh, and the FBI are partly responsible for ignoring the many warnings they got.
Who was responsible mostly? The Hijackers, duh! Al Queida (SP?) didn't exist until the US invented it. It was so overplayed by the Media though. There's millions being slaughtered elsewhere in wars, but a few thousand die in the US, and its all we hear about for months. Then they think that invading a county or 10 will help them find guerillas who move about all the time and have no assigned country of residence becaue they don't have a home.
And where were these undergound cities the CIA said that the terrorists lived in, exactally?
Not entirely true. It's probably fair to say that the group of loosely affiliated terrorist organisations was not named Al-Qaeda by those who belong to it. They go by the names of their own groups (Ansar Al-Islam, Al-Aqsar Martyr's Brigade etc) but they do have common ideals and they have been known to pool resources and work together.
What evidence do you have that the Al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigade is linked at Al-Qaida?
That's the point. They're linked to other groups which fall under the umbrella which worldwide intelligence services have taken to calling Al Qaida.
I don't know how to feel about the 911 incident, in that how come the passports of the 'terrorists' didn't burn? And how did they know the passports belonged to the ones who apparently hijacked an aeroplane if nobody was left surviving to confirm it was them?
Guess the "American government" were just lucky. They are exceptionally good at finding "lone gunmen" and the like when they have to.
The "UK govt" doesn't tend to be as good at it. The only time I can remember them being so lucky is when they found the body of Dr. David Kelly. As I remember it went from "he's missing" to "found him" in an hour or two.
Mohamed Atta's passport was found in his luggage which never left Portland airport. There was also alledgedly a suicide note.
Shame he's still alive in Bombay. (Read Seeker's links)