If you need urgent support, call 999 or go to your nearest A&E. To contact our Crisis Messenger (open 24/7) text THEMIX to 85258.
Read the community guidelines before posting ✨
Options
Take a look around and enjoy reading the discussions. If you'd like to join in, it's really easy to register and then you'll be able to post. If you'd like to learn what this place is all about, head here.
Comments
Then the people are chemically neuteured.
So no one can can make babies without permission.
That way you could also automatically anyone who commited serious crimes etc too.
Yay.
Britain is not overpopulated.
A problem has to exist before it can be recognised.
I have a feeling that what you really mean is that you want a tougher immigration policy which stops all those horrid blakcs and muslims from enetering the country.
Seriously, what eveidence is there to support your assertion that the UUK is overpopulated.
Would it be the fact that more house are empty that there a homeless people? Would it be that we have enough food to feed ourselves and still throw mountains away?
What exactly is your evidence?
Ain't that right nckdn?
It's unfair Kermit, to suggest I hold views like this. I don't. I've never used language like that in my life, or held those opinions.
Do you believe in racial separatism?
I don't hold that attitude.... It's jst what we'll have to do if we want to survive long term.
define long term.
somebody work out for me please ...the nearest star is 4.5 light years away ...how many millions of miles is that?
it looks like it has no planets around it. so where are we going again?
and ...the attitude moon is one of we have fucked up we're going to have to leave at some point ...that to me says we can't fix what we already have ...in abundance!
Then maybe someday I'll flit to Mars.
If a family had only one child, and it was a girl, quite often these would be left in the streets, unclaimed, and the family would try for a boy.
As everyone is saying, Britain is not overpopulated enough to warrant those measures. the problem is the demographic distribution, everyone crowds into the cities as there's a lot more entertainment and work.
if you want to balance it out, you end up destroying the beautiful countryside we have.
That wouldn't even be justified if Britain was overpopulated. But seeing as nckdn can't even give supporting evidence to these boards, I cannot see how he thinks that the British public would agree with him.
Wassock.
First post, Kunt.
"Our islands cannot support it's human population...huge environmental costs...turning whole regions of the world into factories...cities overcrowded... countryside destroyed...inter-ethnic tension...scarce resources...travel and health systems cannot cope..."
Some of these problems are directly caused by Britain's overpopulation, ALL would be improved by a reduction in population.
Oh boy.
That was done years ago.
No they wouldn't.
And here we go back to killing the pakis...
supporting evidence... facts, links, quotes... not your opinions!
Please stop this. I've said I don't use language like that or have opinions like that. Did you read my response to your post in the 'buying Islamic votes' thread? How can you imagine that I want to kill Muslims? I actually admire them. You don't have to imagine what my opinions are, I'll post them. And what's wrong with you that your imagination is so unpleasant? I don't intend that as an insult, I seriously think you might have a problem.
Queenmab, I think these things are so obvious aren't they? What are you disputing?
http://www.population-growth-migration.info/essays/HowMany2.html
Fiend_85 are you disputing a lack of any evidence, the lack of any evidence, or the presence of any evidence? Or are you disputing the obvious?
Very mature. Do you feel the big man now?
Opinion, not backed up with any evidence, which is what I asked for.
I'm looking at the link you provided. Actually I'm looking at the whole website, gives me more information about the source...
Do you believe in racial or cultural separatism? Yes/no answer.
[edited for grammar]
Here, small words.
You, that nckdn, have not, or ever, provided, given, or shown us, any relevant, topical or reliable proof or evidence that gives weight to your opinions. You continue to avoid, and ignore, direct questions.
And I'm not convinced that the link you provided actually gives me the evidence I asked for. It seems to be looking at one agenda.
Guess which one...
I didn't post the last link to give you evidence. If you dispute my claims, you're disputing that fewer cars on the road would ease congestion, that natives in poor areas resent the settling of economic migrants, that Prescott wants to extend the concrete jungle, that we import food from around the world because we can't produce enough here, that farmland and wildlife have suffered because of intensive farming. You're disputing all this? And saying that if I don't google up scientific reports to prove it, that I am avoiding the discussion? Get a grip fella! I'm aware that one of the sites I linked to is avowedly against immigration. The concern about overpopulation leads to concern about immigration tho', not the other way round. I deliberately linked to a debate between two respected academics on the immigration aspect of the overpopulation problem to give some balance. I've read it thro' because I have an open mind about these issues (did you and Fiend_85?). In all countries in the developed world whose population is increasing, the rise is due to economic immigration from poorer countries. The increase in population leads to greater exploitation of the less developed countries, which in turn creates new economic migrants. At some point the craziness has to stop and the sooner the better.
This is a good UK population site with a lot of information which might convince open-minded people that population issues are at least worth thinking about. I've added this link to the start of the thread too for any newlookers. http://www.optimumpopulation.org
I don't believe it's desireable or practically possible, do you?