If you need urgent support, call 999 or go to your nearest A&E. To contact our Crisis Messenger (open 24/7) text THEMIX to 85258.
Read the community guidelines before posting ✨
Options
Election Map
Former Member
Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
Look here
Just though this would be a helpful tool, it's interesting the way things flip back and forth.
Just though this would be a helpful tool, it's interesting the way things flip back and forth.
0
Comments
Go Bush!
But karma is very much likely to bite him on the arse on this one.
It could be he or his children developing severe asthma due to Dubya's refusal to cut down on CO2 emissions.
It could be a relative of him losing their home to unprecedented rising sea levels.
It could be his loved ones being blown up when Britain gets attacked for hosting the Star Wars missile shield listening stations.
It could be he and his friends being unable to find a decent job and slipping under the poverty line due to global recession caused by ever-increasing oil prices because of Bush's imperialistic wars of aggression against the Arab and Muslim world.
Or it could be just about everyone being blown to pieces if Dubya or his protected butcher in the Middle East finally succeed in starting WWIII.
But it won't be independent, it will probably spark off a new arms race and it's estimated that it will have cost $64 Bn by 2015
Bread not bombs........
And an 'arms race' coming from Green Euro MP and peace campaigner Caroline Lucas warned today. Yeah, really credible opinion...
I studied the original proposal, that would work. And of course you saying 'but it won't be independent' I don't care, I said 'if it were independent' didn't I?
And if it isn't independent, then how is throwing away billions on it, when 6000 children die every day from lack of access to clean water, justifiable, or 'good for the planet'?
Perhaps you should try reading some World Bank reports on world aid. It's not how much money goes, and there's enough, it's where it goes and what the qualifications are.
It's be like reading the Paedophile Association's guide on "good child rearing practice"
The World Bank are part of the problem ...........
I'm glad you're such an expert. Your response totally fails to surprise me.
After nearly 20 years of peace and a reduction of the nuclear arsenals of the US and Russia, that fucking chimp has succeeded in re-starting a new arms race already. The Russians have already stated that if the project goes ahead they will upgrade their existing missiles to be able to beat the shield. What will they do in effect is to increase the number of heads carried per missile- on the simple principle that the shield won't be able to stop them all even if it works (which most experts say it won't).
The Chinese are not going to fall behind either, so from having a very stable and low-level arsenals we've gone to several nations re-starting their nuclear programmes and talking about increasing the number of warheads in their missiles. Well done Mr fucking Bush! :mad:
The Republican scumbags also forgot to tell us that naturally the shield is completely useless against more mundane methods of delivery- dropped from aircraft, smuggled in a shipping container, contained in a suitcase... the whole thing is a monumental waste of money and time and the only reason it's going ahead is to for the weapons dealers and their Republican chums to line up their pockets with a few more billions.
Like the fucking selfish evil cunts they are.
My qualifying statement was 'if it were independent' which shouldn't be disregarded, for it to be a successful 'safety net' it's important for it to be an international effort and once in action there to be no central control. So that it cannot be tampered with easily.
Rubbish, any effect of that size would take hundreds of years.
Lol, not jsut the Us's fault. Besides, its natural.
No matter how much you want this to happen, it aint.
Oil prices were rising anyway.
Thaats why there are things like the police force, coast guard etc.
Heres the story of Ghana, water and the World Bank
Ghana certainly isn't the worst case, and the scenario has been repeated all over Africa, Asia and South America.
I'm certainly not an expert, but I do have some interest and some knowledge ............
Nope!
How original.
Unlike you who reveres and takes pleasure in war and destruction, I do not wish or want for attacks of any kind on anyone to take place.
As for the likeness of it to happen, how do you know exactly it won't? Do you have a magic ball?
Don't be ridiculous.
Why don't you do a little bit of research? For a change...
God save the poor Americans if they have to rely on that
they don't seem to be able to stop billions of quids worth of drugs moving around the world in ships and planes.
if you wanted to deliver an atomic bomb to london ...ask a drug smuggler.
A drug smuggler is not insane, I doubt hed want to kill millions of his customers.